FrameCode-VibeWork profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes of the memory profile against the handed runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow findings, resolving the four superseded epistemic object identities through the handed reconciliation. The profile uses the canonical memory objects and retains the distinct epistemic phase routes. Its scope concerns accumulated project artifacts and their access and update mechanisms, not the external host's parameters or unchanged shipped instructions. No source ambiguity required an additional source read; no source files were read and no target execution was performed.

  • Storage substrate: file storage and repository retention are supported for the canonical Markdown artifacts; file storage is wired for generated JSON/JSONL and verification outputs. A typed graph's encoding is not treated as a graph database. The separate navigation/catalog mechanism remains unresolved, so the partial axis does not claim a complete substrate inventory. See MEM-OBJ-wiki, MEM-OBJ-context-index, MEM-OBJ-knowledge-graph and RT-RTE-local-checks.
  • Representational form: host-interpreted prose and fixed-rule metadata have distinct consumption scopes. The copied index's two findings explicitly distinguish interpreting excerpts from symbolic selection features, rather than classifying JSON serialization as a form. The records support both paths. Unsupplied QA evidence is not classified from its audit description, and the navigation alternative remains uninspected. See MEM-OBJ-context-index, MEM-OBJ-wiki-metadata, MEM-OBJ-product-contract, MEM-OBJ-qa-run and RT-RTE-context-delivery.
  • Lineage: authored project records, imported material, prescribed work-derived handoffs/revisions and mechanically compiled access state have supported, separately named derivation paths. A known derivation path does not resolve arbitrary initialization or the original provenance of mixed inputs. The trace-extracted finding remains claimed and partial rather than becoming an observed or universally authenticated lineage. See MEM-OBJ-wiki, MEM-RTE-session-handoff, MEM-RTE-index-build, RT-RTE-asset-admission and RT-RTE-framework-upgrade.
  • Behavioral authority: the seven emitted forces have identified consumers and effects. Evidence at a later host is not assigned the instruction force of a subsequently revised skill. Experience at the revision consumer supports the claimed learning force without establishing improved capacity. Retained text and metadata can rank results under fixed code. Plan references/dependencies select scope; contracts and provenance fields supply check criteria; plan presence and QA results have bounded veto effects. The profile does not extend these effects into universal host enforcement. See MEM-BAP-knowledge-consumption, RT-BAP-policy-consumption, RT-RTE-asset-admission, RT-RTE-context-delivery, RT-RTE-mcp-checks, RT-RTE-hook-lifecycle, EPI-RTE-source-review, EPI-RTE-evidence-check, EPI-RTE-qa-check and EPI-RTE-divergence-decision.
  • Write agency: wired software admission is distinct from the claimed model-host branch. Starting a command or session is not treated as per-content human approval. The host-model branch can admit summaries/revisions without a separate human content decision; this supports automatic only at the stated doctrine strength. Explicit human content supply and product-divergence decisions support the separate manual branch. Generic upgrade callers and arbitrary initialization remain unresolved. See MEM-RTE-index-build, MEM-RTE-session-handoff, RT-RTE-asset-admission, MEM-OBJ-wiki, MEM-RTE-product-review, EPI-RTE-divergence-decision and RT-RTE-framework-upgrade.
  • Curation operations: consolidation, deduplication, evolution, invalidation and promotion retain claimed strength for host-performed semantic work. The distinct wired decay finding concerns lifecycle downweighting at retrieval, supported by the memory annotation on the cited runtime route. Digest warnings are not mistaken for automatic invalidation; packaging and archive moves do not create semantic operations. Novel-claim synthesis remains undetermined rather than inferred from a category name. See MEM-RTE-session-handoff, EPI-RTE-wiki-review, MEM-RTE-source-review and RT-RTE-context-delivery.
  • Read-back direction: caller-requested retrieval, sections, queue and metadata checks support wired pull; instructed host resumption supports a separate claimed pull finding. Session-start plan-identity delivery supports wired push. No-write readers remain consumers of retained state. The current runtime records already incorporate that distinction, so the memory integration issue's stale account of an earlier runtime does not invalidate the classifications. See RT-RTE-context-delivery, RT-RTE-mcp-checks, EPI-RTE-evidence-check, EPI-RTE-source-review, MEM-RTE-session-handoff and RT-RTE-hook-lifecycle.
  • Read-back signal: the hook's trigger, directory/status inputs, selected filenames and pending-name cap support coarse push selection. Emitting an identifier is not an identity-match selector. Lexical selection inside a requested return does not establish inferred-lexical push. Inapplicability is confined to the characterized pull operations; unresolved alternatives remain included rather than being made inapplicable by those operations. See RT-RTE-hook-lifecycle, RT-RTE-context-delivery and RT-RTE-mcp-checks.
  • Trace learning: the claimed yes is supported for the model-host branch that automatically admits work-informed durable summaries or guidance for later consumption. The lack of an implemented FCVW model writer limits evidence strength, not the existence of the prescribed branch. The finding does not assert observed operation, novelty or improved capacity. Unresolved updates remain separate and no unsupported local or system-wide no is emitted. See MEM-RTE-session-handoff, RT-RTE-asset-admission, MEM-OBJ-decision-trace and RT-RTE-local-checks.
  • Trace source: conversation and recorded validation/runtime feedback support claimed session-logs and tool-traces findings for the qualifying host-update branches. The memory annotation on asset admission supplies the mixed conversation input; the handoff route supplies work/validation inputs and the later consumer. Neither finding authenticates every actual note's provenance. Static imports, hook events and multistep work are not used to infer additional source values. See RT-RTE-asset-admission, MEM-RTE-session-handoff and RT-RTE-local-checks.

The partial assessments preserve the named unresolved navigation, linked-payload, initialization and update alternatives. The grouped units identify their operative parts, mechanisms or consumption paths sufficiently to preserve the supported comparison findings; they do not upgrade an unresolved alternative through another route's witness. Complete-value statistics, actual host reliance, observed trace learning and demonstrated improvement remain unsupported, as the profile itself states. These are faithfully scoped uncertainties, not additional defects requiring a publication limit. The workflow's host-owned review and recovery account does not supply execution evidence that would upgrade any profile basis; see workflow account.

Blockers

none

Limits

none