llm-wiki report verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

The current reports support a bounded, source-grounded account. The earlier ingest blocker and standalone-index-refresh limit are resolved. This judgment follows independent source inspection, not acceptance of the correction answer. The frozen checkout HEAD equals the reviewed revision and its tracked working tree is clean. The knowledge-system boundary remains supported: shipped adapters, maintenance and evaluation paths belong to the target; enclosing model execution does not. Source authority remains SRC-1 in the Source register. No target code, tests, examples or external services were executed.

I reviewed every declared record, its source anchors and supporting passages, evidence strength, annotations, explicit containment, supersessions, integration issues and the workflow account. The structural report-check reports none, so there is no structural failure to route. Runtime, memory and workflow correction answers are empty. The epistemic answer claims correction of ingestion and index logging; the present text and source support both repairs. No evidenced-absence record is declared. Implementation, prescription and observed operation remain separate throughout; no internal distributed-parametric executor or model-parameter change is established by the inspected routes.

Independent traces and dispositions

Read, write and admission. Direct inspection of SRC-1 packages/core/index.mjs, packages/core/lib/bundle.mjs, packages/core/lib/search.mjs, packages/core/lib/write.mjs and packages/core/lib/rules.mjs, followed by CLI/MCP/DSH/pi create and update handlers, supports RT-RTE-bundle-read, RT-RTE-concept-create and RT-RTE-concept-update. Graph reconstruction, lexical selection and ID/title/prefix lookup have the stated scope. Covered creates compare the proposed type against the nearest declared gate; the flag is caller-supplied, not authenticated consent. Supported update parameters include type and body changes without that gate. Direct ingest and migration writes are additional reachable admissions, not hypothetical malformed inputs. Core file persistence precedes log/index maintenance. These branches justify rejecting universal human-approval and transactional-write guarantees while preserving the actual create refusal.

Ingestion repair. I reread complete SRC-1 packages/core/lib/ingest.mjs and packages/core/lib/bundle.mjs. Copy occurs before stem-based readConcept. A readable copied Markdown file satisfies that lookup even without frontmatter; a missing stem concept instead reaches generated Reference creation. EPI-OBJ-reference now identifies only the raw asset and explicitly recognizes its identity with MEM-OBJ-reference-source. EPI-OBJ-derived-reference separately identifies the conditional page, excerpt, resource pointer and graph/get consumers. Its Part of relation to EPI-OBJ-concept is valid. Coverage, inventory, ledger and bounded conclusion all preserve the condition rather than promising two artifacts for every ingest. The concrete copy/excerpt deduction follows the source without executing it. Existing destination bytes need not match the current external excerpt. Acquisition, byte preservation, possible loss of qualifications and indeterminate semantic relation are correctly separated. The previous blocker is discharged.

Retained parts and actual consumer input. The body, metadata, raw source, index, log, registry, cloud ledger/backups and autosync objects in memory's Shared records have supported, distinct consumers. I inspected their source modules and the CLI/MCP/pi get renderers. Search projects selected fields; common get displays do not serialize all stored trust/source/computation bindings. Backlinks deliver references, not linked bodies or their reasons. Search/get do not apply a universal verified, stale or deprecated exclusion. EPI-OBJ-trust-fields is genuinely part of the concept container; body updates can preserve earlier verification entries. The reports correctly distinguish stored provenance, delivered text and factual warrant.

Context delivery and adapter differences. I followed DSH assembly/cache and autosync regions, pi's prompt hook, MCP server/instructions assembly, Codex's stdio dispatch and hook, and CLI rule/appendix dispatch. SRC-1 packages/dsh/wiki.mjs, packages/pi/extensions/index.ts, packages/mcp/lib/server.mjs, packages/mcp/lib/instructions.mjs, packages/codex/bin/wiki-mcp.mjs, packages/codex/hooks/inject-context.mjs and packages/skill/bin/wiki.mjs support RT-RTE-context-delivery and RT-BAP-rule-delivery. Broad APPEND collection differs from ancestor-chain requests; truncation, TTL caching, initialization snapshots and digest suppression bound delivery. MCP get does not append rules despite the documentation's fallback promise. These mechanisms supply text rather than compacting host turns or creating isolated model-worker frames. Read-only comparison found no mismatches across core index and thirteen named library modules against all four vendor copies; Codex/MCP tools and instructions also match. Shared implementation does not establish wrapper equivalence or installed-package parity. The qualifications on RT-CLM-form-equivalence are warranted.

Diagnostics, navigation and migration. Direct source inspection of SRC-1 packages/core/lib/validate.mjs, packages/core/lib/lint.mjs, frontmatter parsing/serialization and relevant YAML parsing branches supports the bounded structural predicates in EPI-RTE-format-check and EPI-RTE-health-check. Diagnostic output is not domain-truth evaluation or mandatory prewrite acceptance. Complete indexlog inspection confirms standalone refresh writes indexes and returns paths without appendLog; mutation callers log separately. EPI-RTE-index-refresh now makes that distinction in its progression, read-back and conclusion. The earlier local limit is discharged. Directory deprecation retains bodies and only changes lifecycle metadata. Both migration scripts support the alternative producers, metadata loss, SQL-based type inference and Markdown-only cloud selection described by MEM-RTE-bundle-migration, EPI-RTE-legacy-migration and EPI-RTE-cloud-migration. Type inference is not attestation, and omitted SQL assets prevent assuming complete computation transfer.

Checks versus outcomes. The complete skill supports EPI-CLM-knowledge-recording as requested external investigation and recording discipline. The smoke script supplies synthetic expectations, not observed passes. The revenue and SQL attester files support EPI-RTE-attester-check as doctrine only, not an implemented receipt-to-verdict consumer. Missing host traces do not prove absent host evaluators. The reports preserve this boundary and do not infer accepted ampliative knowledge, learning or exercised self-improvement merely from retention or prompt delivery.

Remote effects and recovery. SRC-1 packages/core/lib/git.mjs synchronization and the Feishu status, backup/pull, sync, guard/flush, forget and delete regions support RT-RTE-remote-sync. Ordinary Git push arguments, local commits before fetch/merge, conflict responses, derived-file reconciliation, guard-exception fallback and explicit irreversible deletion have the stated scope. CLI/MCP/DSH guards differ from pi update. Feishu ordinary no-delete synchronization must not be generalized to Git tracked deletions or explicit delete. No universal distributed lock, race freedom, successful remote operation or semantic reconciliation is established. Ledger and timer-result retention do not establish semantic learning.

The workflow account traces a coherent prescribed skill/CLI chain. Independent skill and CLI reads confirm caller-owned investigation, exit-2 confirmation refusal, caller recovery, optional diagnostics and the distinction between local persistence, remote publication and the host's domain deliverable. No observed successful session is claimed.

The reconciliation correctly connects raw-source, directory-deprecation and index-refresh duplicates. Each amendment preserves referent and evidence strength. Concept body/metadata, trust fields and the derived Reference are compatible parts of a valid concept container. Index/log, diagnostics and migration groupings retain distinguishable effects rather than treating their parts as interchangeable. The explicit Part of relations are supported; no valid container needs split supersession merely because finer records exist. The former ingest and logging conflicts have been repaired in the declaring member and no remaining conflicting finding requires an Unresolved conflict paragraph. Memory's integration issues receive supported dispositions: narrower consumer displays, MCP's missing appendix, Markdown-ingest overlap, soft retirement and unresolved host/remote evidence are retained without being converted into absence claims.

I selected omission questions from the frozen top-level tree and producer/consumer dependencies: could another shipped producer bypass create admission; could intermediate formatting discard rules or warrant; and could maintenance, examples or adjacent host surfaces add a consequential evaluator or automatic semantic-update route? Independent source searches covered core writers and receipt/attester, model-call and context-transformation terms, plus the DSH client, examples and Obsidian material. Additional reads included SRC-1 packages/core/lib/prompt.mjs, the DSH client RPC introduction in packages/dsh/src/client/index.ts, examples/demo-bundle/references/skills/run-on-bq.md and obsidian/templates/AttestedComputation.md. They supply implementation or doctrine/design only. The prompt generator affords caller installation of static host guidance; the example executor and template do not establish a running evaluator or automatic semantic revision. These inspections leave the reports' bounded conclusions intact rather than supporting a system-complete negative.

Further optional omission expansion stopped because the selected consequential questions have supported dispositions, the earlier material challenge is repaired, and no identified material contradiction remains. Exhaustive packaging/UI behavior, other tests/examples, translation parity and all remote options remain uncertified. The reports already withhold those comparisons and successful-operation conclusions; unsearched behavior is not evidenced absence. Faithfully stated uncertainty about external approval, synthesis, compliance, activation and benefit needs no additional defect or limit.

Blockers

none

Limits

none