Eidetic report verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

The current reports support a bounded implementation account. The previous quotation-gate blocker is repaired in the epistemic record, ledger, claim comparison and bounded conclusion. No material blocker remains; the child-lane inventory limit below remains. The structural report-check says none. The epistemic correction answer is supported by the current text and frozen implementation; the other answer files are empty. Reconciliation's statement that no correction answers were supplied describes its own inputs, not this verifier's handout.

The checkout HEAD equals the revision in the Source register, and Git status is clean. I inspected the frozen tree and source text, not target execution, tests, examples or providers. Added inspection is SRC-1 implementation or attributed doctrine/design. It establishes neither observed operation nor causal benefit. I reviewed every declaration, annotation, source anchor, evidence status, parent relation and reconciliation disposition. Independent source checks concentrated on consequential producers, gates, selection and later consumers; the analysts' validation statements were not treated as semantic verification.

Records and behavior checked

  • Lifecycle extraction and delivery. RT-CMP-session-extractor, RT-RTE-signal-compound, RT-RTE-context-injection, RT-OBJ-memory-context, RT-CLM-feedback-visibility and RT-BAP-memory-rules preserve the distinction between model proposals, code-shaped admission, retention and host consumption. SRC-1 install.sh, hooks/session-signals.sh, hooks/smart-memory-inject.sh, bin/compound.py and bin/assemble_context.py support the registered lifecycle, bounded excerpt, provider progression, protected destinations and best-effort refresh/assembly. Feedback overflow preserves names, not full semantics. The workflow account correctly separates card persistence, selected file delivery and external host loading. Text-only spool enqueue and the draining invocation's single CWD support its project-routing warning; failed compounding leaves spool files, while capped draining and the legacy branch prevent an eventual or lossless-delivery guarantee. History retry and daily-signal deduplication are different mechanisms. These qualifications do not contradict runtime's best-effort account.
  • Caller admission and retrieval. RT-RTE-explicit-admission, RT-CLM-base-isolation and RT-RTE-memory-recall are supported within their path-local scopes. SRC-1 bin/remember.py, bin/base.py, mcp_server.py, bin/index_impl.py, bin/search_impl.py and skill/SKILL.md distinguish an explicit-user tool policy from an approval credential, scan realpath containment from OS isolation, indexed detail from current file bytes, and forked recall from eviction of foreground turns. Direct creation of feedback and lexical timeout fallback are already retained counterpaths. RT-CMP-embed, RT-CMP-rerank and RT-CMP-query-translation agree with SRC-1 bin/embed.py, bin/rerank.py and bin/translate.py on configured identities and pinning limits. Their call sites do not establish provider-internal parameter stability.
  • Retained operative parts. MEM-OBJ-memory-cards, MEM-OBJ-memory-chunks, MEM-OBJ-evidence-events and MEM-OBJ-admission-traces distinguish durable prose, copied sections, metadata, dense projections and later-selection traces. SRC-1 bin/index_impl.py, bin/confidence.py, bin/m3_autofile.py, bin/m3_seen_cache.py and bin/usage.py support their named consumers: current typed Evidence is reparsed; decorative deltas do not govern the fold; definitive outcomes suppress same-session candidates; surfaced-result telemetry is not measured benefit. EPI-OBJ-signal-cards, EPI-OBJ-recall-provenance, EPI-OBJ-synthesis-region and EPI-OBJ-confidence-events retain narrower parts without attributing factual warrant to persistence or score labels.
  • Additional push and pull selectors. MEM-RTE-fresh-handoff, MEM-RTE-session-hints, MEM-RTE-code-projection, MEM-BAP-session-awareness and MEM-RTE-serendipity-read are supported by SRC-1 bin/assemble_context.py, bin/session_counter.py, bin/code_index.py and bin/serendipity.py. Fresh file selection bypasses indexed-card admission; session thresholds select fixed directives rather than measured expertise; code rows copy source entities rather than session lessons; serendipity prefers cross-project candidates. Actual host loading and useful connections remain unobserved.
  • Maintenance and ranking. RT-RTE-semantic-maintenance, MEM-RTE-evidence-projection, EPI-RTE-m2-reshaping and EPI-RTE-confidence-ranking are supported by SRC-1 bin/index_impl.py, bin/m1_contradiction.py, bin/m2_synthesis.py, bin/confidence.py and bin/search_impl.py. I checked captured-failure handling before M2 dispatch, retained pending work, separate write/rank switches, same-project constraints, authority protection, relevance failure and managed-region/event recovery. Default consolidation selects, cleans, deduplicates and orders linked source one-liners; the non-ampliative classification is supported for that default, with lossy truncation qualified and callback output indeterminate. Confidence algebra has an inspectable formal domain but no demonstrated truth calibration. EPI-CLM-truth-maintenance fairly bounds SRC-1 README.md warrant prose against heuristic demotion and missing efficacy evidence.
  • M3 support, filing and promotion. RT-CMP-shimnachi-local, RT-RTE-m3-filing, EPI-RTE-support-check, EPI-RTE-acquisition-check and EPI-CLM-support-gate preserve distinct checking, disposition and retention functions. SRC-1 bin/m3_hook.py, bin/m3_autofile.py, bin/m3_judge.py and bin/m3_acquisition.py establish source requirements and support-before-dedup ordering. Failed registration leaves overlap; a registered scorer's later failure does not silently revert to overlap. The corrected epistemic report now explicitly states that _REQUIRE_QUOTE defaults on but can be disabled with 0, false or an empty value. Its ledger, comparison and conclusion no longer imply a mechanically required quotation on the raw-verdict path. Acquisition separately checks occurrence in assistant turns before calling the shared judge, so that prerequisite survives disabling the judge's additional quote gate. Neither source occurrence nor model support proves world truth. MEM-RTE-test-affirmation and EPI-RTE-test-affirmation correctly retain conditional promotion capacity. SRC-1 bin/lifecycle_signals.py, bin/m3_hook.py and bin/m3_autofile.py expose HMAC versus transcript-parent project identities and an exact-string join. Matching supplied records can promote; ordinary hook promotion is not established. Project-level test correlation does not test each card proposition.
  • Withdrawal, export and evaluators. MEM-RTE-card-withdrawal, EPI-RTE-cleanup-archive and EPI-RTE-curate-archive distinguish SRC-1 bin/cleanup.py relocation/log deletion from bin/curate.py reversible status writes and promotion proposals. Their source-label qualifications are supported; command invocation does not prove per-card human judgment. MEM-RTE-vault-export, EPI-RTE-vault-generation, EPI-OBJ-vault-pages, MEM-CMP-export-models and EPI-CMP-vault-models agree with SRC-1 bin/export_vault.py on model constants, selected note inputs, delta skipping, output-length acceptance and generated page writes. Process success and preservation prompts do not establish semantic fidelity. EPI-RTE-smoke-evaluation correctly traces SRC-1 bin/recall_smoke.py authored substring/confidence checks to process status, not runtime filing or truth acceptance.
  • Client projections and product updates. RT-RTE-engine-worker and RT-RTE-product-update are supported by SRC-1 bin/eidetic_engine_worker.py and bin/update.sh. Logical index IDs resolve through Core configuration; complete snapshots permit deletion and stamp repair; incompatible stamps produce degraded search. Update ancestry guards, force overrides, per-file replacement and refresh-pending distinguish integrity/retry from source safety or whole-install atomicity. These routes do not by themselves establish evidence-responsive self-improvement.

All declared route implementation statuses remain supported as wired capacities; operation is uninspected. No evidenced-absence records are declared. The epistemic function overlays do not merge checking with disposition or retention with lifecycle integration. Missing execution evidence is not treated as absent architecture, and restrained learning/theory-builder conclusions are not system-complete negatives.

Reconciliation and omission dispositions

The duplicate supersessions preserve identity: both export-model records identify the same configured roles; both Evidence records identify the typed event/projection/fold parts. Neither amendment strengthens an evidence status. All explicit Part of: relations are supported: handoff, hints and code projection belong to injection; support, dark acquisition and later affirmation belong to the broad M3 route; managed synthesis belongs to maintenance. The support claim's route parent is explained as a different-kind relation. The container distinctions preserve valid larger scopes instead of declaring false full identity. The integration dispositions correctly treat detail freshness, ordinary test identity, spool recovery, export model prose and scorer headings as compatible qualifications. No unresolved-conflict paragraph is supplied, and no material disagreement requiring one was established.

Omission questions were selected from the frozen tree, installer/MCP surfaces and producer-to-consumer dependencies. Could another writer defeat the claimed approval barrier? Direct personal/base writers confirm that the reports already describe path-local policy, not a universal barrier. Could child-agent processing admit ordinary cards or retain additional selection state? SRC-1 bin/m3_agent_lane.py drops recall candidates, routes acquisition candidates to dark logging/cache, and reads a durable completion ledger before selection. That supports the card-versus-dark distinction but leaves the partial inventory limit below. Could an alternate judge remove mechanically checked quote occurrence? Independent configuration/verdict inspection confirms the now-retained raw-verdict alternative; the previous blocker is discharged, not moved into Limits. Could replay or commissioning close a live evaluation-to-card loop omitted from the bounded account? SRC-1 bin/m3_post_entailment_replay.py has evidence-plan routing without destination-write mode; SRC-1 bin/m3_commission.py separates event reports from owner-gated activation. These checks do not establish complete evaluator coverage or a system-wide absence of policy adaptation.

Further optional omission expansion stopped because every selected material challenge has a supported disposition or the local inventory limit. Uninspected parser, evaluator, replay, commissioning and host/provider alternatives prevent exhaustive comparisons, not the supported implementation positives. No emitted complete-coverage or absence finding depends on dismissing those alternatives. Additional files alone do not justify broader investigation without a consequential unsupported conclusion.

Blockers

none

Limits

  • MEM-OBJ-admission-traces, RT-RTE-m3-filing and EPI-RTE-acquisition-check leave child-agent retained-state details partial. Independent SRC-1 bin/m3_agent_lane.py inspection confirms a durable completion ledger whose successful acknowledgement controls later selection, in addition to judged cache and dark outcomes. The existing bounded card-filing and retry distinctions hold; withhold complete child-lane checkpoint, retained-state and recovery comparisons. The reports do not claim a complete inventory, so this omitted part does not invalidate their central conclusions.

    floor_ns, done_map, status = read_ledger(memory_system) --- bin/m3_agent_lane.py if _append_ledger(memory_system, done_row): out["done"] = True --- bin/m3_agent_lane.py