Eidetic reconciliation

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

The supplied reports use the same frozen revision and Source register. Implementation, declared intent and reported operation do not become observed execution or causal evidence through reconciliation. This account connects the current pinned records; the previous reconciliation is not evidence for their findings. No refusal or analyst correction answers were supplied. No additional source reads were needed. Workflow declares no new records and adds annotations to runtime routes.

Duplicate supersessions

Amendment: EPI-CMP-vault-models is superseded by MEM-CMP-export-models. Both identify POLISH_MODEL_SONNET, POLISH_MODEL_HAIKU, TOPIC_CLUSTER_MODEL and TOPIC_SYNTHESIS_MODEL in SRC-1 bin/export_vault.py, used through external claude-batch routes. Their configuration evidence agrees on Opus topic synthesis, label-only version identity and environment/provider mutability. The affected export model findings concern the same components; the supersession changes neither report's generation or warrant assessment and retains both declarations.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-confidence-events is superseded by MEM-OBJ-evidence-events. Both name typed card Evidence, the index's event projection and the symbolic confidence fold. Memory's SRC-1 bin/index_impl.py passage excludes legacy History, while epistemic's linked confidence and affirmation records establish the fixed numerical consumers. Confidence-ranking and promotion findings therefore concern the same operative parts. This identity does not authenticate event actors or turn numerical confidence into truth probability.

Containers, parts and nonidentities

EPI-OBJ-signal-cards covers personal signal/promoted cards within the broader MEM-OBJ-memory-cards, which also covers topic corpus files and M3 answers. Their scopes are not identical. EPI-OBJ-recall-provenance isolates M3 answer/support material, and EPI-OBJ-synthesis-region isolates M2 managed text inside cards. The card container remains valid alongside these distinct parts; no split supersession is warranted. The SRC-1 bin/m3_autofile.py answer-plus-Provenance construction and bin/m2_synthesis.py managed-region evidence support containment, not identity with a whole card store.

None of those objects is RT-OBJ-memory-context, the generated host-delivery file, or MEM-OBJ-memory-chunks, the indexed text/metadata/dense projection. MEM-OBJ-admission-traces instead names cache, test-correlation and telemetry parts with their own later consumers. EPI-OBJ-vault-pages names exported/generated pages for vault readers, not source cards, rules or their indexes. No further object supersession follows from their shared text or filesystem substrates.

EPI-RTE-vault-generation covers model polish and topic-generation/write seams within MEM-RTE-vault-export. The latter also covers discovery, templates, manifests and delta-export read-back. SRC-1 bin/export_vault.py passages on bounded note selection, output-length acceptance and source-hash skipping describe these different functions. The valid export container needs no split supersession. The superseded export model components are not these output objects or either route.

EPI-RTE-cleanup-archive and EPI-RTE-curate-archive isolate alternatives grouped in MEM-RTE-card-withdrawal. Cleanup moves files and can delete lifecycle logs; curate writes reversible status and also offers promotion proposals. The combined record explicitly distinguishes those alternatives, so separating them makes none of its findings false. These are not identities with each other or with RT-RTE-semantic-maintenance, the pending M1/M2 route. No archival supersession is warranted.

MEM-RTE-test-affirmation and EPI-RTE-test-affirmation share the project/session-correlated test producer. Full identity is ruled out: epistemic also traces the affirmation consumer's user_affirmation/confirmed alternative, whereas memory isolates test promotion and the ordinary-hook identity mismatch. Both remain later parts of RT-RTE-m3-filing, not replacements for initial support checking and filing. The shared producer's limitations apply without superseding either differently scoped route.

MEM-RTE-fresh-handoff, MEM-RTE-session-hints and MEM-RTE-code-projection retain different input, selector and persistence responsibilities within RT-RTE-context-injection. They do not duplicate whole injection or each other. MEM-BAP-session-awareness carries count-selected guidance, whereas RT-BAP-memory-rules carries retained feedback. Their common delivery file does not establish authority-path identity. MEM-RTE-serendipity-read is a distinct registered connection-oriented read, not RT-RTE-memory-recall's confidence/detail pipeline.

EPI-RTE-support-check isolates recall support evaluation, while EPI-RTE-acquisition-check isolates the dark acquisition branch of RT-RTE-m3-filing. They have different inputs, gates and dispositions and are not interchangeable or duplicate filing routes. EPI-RTE-m2-reshaping isolates construction/commit within semantic maintenance. MEM-RTE-evidence-projection materializes current events and relations even when those transforms are dormant. EPI-RTE-confidence-ranking covers arithmetic and ranking consumption across readers, not either full projection or recall. These overlaps warrant no supersession.

EPI-RTE-smoke-evaluation is an authored-case evaluator with a process-status consumer, not runtime recall or a filing gate. EPI-CLM-truth-maintenance, EPI-CLM-support-gate, RT-CLM-feedback-visibility and RT-CLM-base-isolation concern respectively broader warrant prose, route-local support admission, successful assembly representation and corpus-scan containment. They are distinct claims. Remaining runtime components, RT-RTE-engine-worker and RT-RTE-product-update have no independent declarations of the same referents in the other supplied members.

Integration dispositions

The current EPI-RTE-support-check explicitly distinguishes registration failure, which leaves deterministic overlap, from a registered judge's later failure, which scores zero. Its SRC-1 bin/m3_judge.py passages also distinguish the default-on quote requirement from the configurable raw-verdict path. RT-RTE-m3-filing does not assert that all support uses a judge or requires quote occurrence. Thus the more detailed epistemic finding supplies a compatible scope distinction, not a peer contradiction. EPI-RTE-acquisition-check separately retains assistant-quote occurrence even when the shared judge's additional quote gate is disabled. Neither recall support nor acquisition's would_file outcome can be treated as universal factual validation or ordinary card admission.

The test-promotion issue in memory's integration issues qualifies ordinary routing, not implemented conditional capacity. MEM-RTE-test-affirmation supplies SRC-1 bin/lifecycle_signals.py's HMAC project identity, bin/m3_hook.py's transcript-parent basename and bin/m3_autofile.py's exact-string join. EPI-RTE-test-affirmation requires matching session/project and does not assert ordinary hooks satisfy that condition. RT-RTE-m3-filing describes cold-start filing, not automatic ordinary test promotion. Retain the conditional producer and the unestablished ordinary-hook promotion together. The epistemic claim-level warrant limit remains applicable even for matching supplied records.

Detail freshness is another clarification. Memory's annotation on RT-RTE-memory-recall establishes indexed section expansion and lexical timeout fallback from SRC-1 bin/search_impl.py. Runtime's selected-content wording does not promise latest Markdown bytes; epistemic's candidate-delivery overlay does not confer source freshness or endorsement. No dependent finding requires a freshness guarantee the runtime record lacks.

Other source-label corrections do not establish disagreements between analysts. The export components agree on configured Opus despite Sonnet prose. The archival records agree on CLI write modes without per-item approval despite read-only/human-confirmation descriptions. EPI-OBJ-recall-provenance retains the literal deterministic-overlap heading; memory's M3 annotation and EPI-RTE-support-check distinguish actual scorer alternatives. A persisted heading can mislabel an alternate score without either report claiming all scores are overlap-derived. These discrepancies remain beside their actual consumers.

Workflow's account and annotations further bound RT-RTE-signal-compound. Its SRC-1 hooks/session-signals.sh passages show text-only spool enqueue and the draining invocation's single CWD. It also distinguishes repeatable History appends after partial failure, daily-signal deduplication and the legacy branch's lack of draining. Runtime and memory establish best-effort retry capacity, not project-preserving, exactly-once or guaranteed eventual delivery. These additional recovery limits therefore do not contradict them. Workflow also makes retention, selected rules-file delivery and external host loading separate completion boundaries, consistent with the other members.

Independent convergence and remaining limits

Independent reads converge on path-local admission. RT-RTE-explicit-admission distinguishes host policy from approval evidence. Workflow establishes protocol-shaped signal acceptance without factual verification. The M3 records establish a separate source-relative support disposition. The M2 memory annotation and EPI-RTE-m2-reshaping agree on deterministic linked-line consolidation with optional semantically indeterminate callbacks. Export records agree that successful process/length checks do not validate preserved facts. None of these connections transfers an evaluator, authority or guarantee from one route to another.

No unresolved disagreement between the current pinned reports is established. No required undeclared part is identified whose omission prevents connecting their findings faithfully, and no valid container requires split supersession. No supplied declined objection requires retaining two opposing positions. These are reconciliation dispositions, not judgments of report support or comprehensive coverage.

Inspection depths differ without contradiction. Memory leaves acquisition/agent gates and report schemas partly traced; epistemic supplies additional quote/judge/outcome evidence without closing all child transport, cache or report details. Workflow selects only the Stop-to-later-session chain. Evaluator/replay internals, initial authorship, provider behavior, deployment flags, external host loading and supplied run/causal evidence remain limited as the reports and boundary state. Those limits prevent exhaustive provenance, rollback, evaluation-feedback closure, efficacy or system-wide negative conclusions; they do not erase the separately established implementation paths.