Basic Memory profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes of the memory profile: scoped inventory, natural units, positive findings, evidence bases and coverage assessments. I compared them with the handed runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow members, resolving the schema-report duplicate through the supplied reconciliation to EPI-RTE-schema-validation. No unresolved cross-report conflict changes these classifications. No source checkout files were read; no records, quotations or execution evidence were added.

Correction reviewed. The supplied profile answer addresses the previous objection about transient graph-publication machinery. The current storage unit covers published relations and observations at later traversal and no longer emits an in-memory finding for the prepared publication payload. The overall scope, lineage wording and rationale also exclude that transient payload. MEM-OBJ-graph-publication supports the retained published graph distinction, while MEM-RTE-openclaw-context independently supports a cross-invocation in-memory recall cache. The prior blocker is resolved; an in-memory union supported by the cache does not depend on the removed finding.

Storage and representational form. Database note bodies and sync state, materialized Markdown, published graph relations, envelope files and the OpenClaw cache have local substrate support. Tau receipt backing storage and vector/backend persistence remain unresolved rather than being inferred from their encoding. Prose at interpretive readers, symbolic topology/control fields and dense numerical representations are distinguished. Numerical form does not assert parameter training or a particular persisted vector backend. See MEM-OBJ-markdown-content, MEM-OBJ-sync-state, MEM-OBJ-envelope, MEM-OBJ-capture-record, and RT-CMP-fastembed-provider. Mixed QA prose and accounting fields remain identifiable within the stored-case unit; its classification does not invent artifact-file persistence (EPI-OBJ-qa-case).

Lineage, behavioral authority and write agency. Authoring, import, trace extraction and fixed compilation findings follow recorded derivation paths without resolving all initial provenance. Authority findings identify reference readers, Tau's subsequent handoff-update consumer, query ranking, revision guards, receipt reconciliation and schema checking. System-prompt placement is not treated as standing instruction. Automatic checkpoint and downstream state admission remain distinct from the research prescription's human saving decision and unresolved generic callers. Claimed reflection is not upgraded to implementation. See RT-RTE-note-write, MEM-RTE-tau-handoff, MEM-RTE-hermes-continuity, EPI-RTE-schema-validation, EPI-RTE-research-note, and EPI-RTE-reflect-notes. Grouped units retain identifiable local parts and effects rather than transferring one consumer's force to every object.

Curation operations. Extractive reduction and stable-entry updates support consolidation and evolution. Archive age pruning supports decay. Claimed reflection and archive/status maintenance remain separate from wired deletion. Model-requested synthesis does not establish novel-claim synthesis, and replay accounting does not establish semantic deduplication. See RT-RTE-pi-checkpoint, RT-RTE-hook-checkpoint, MEM-RTE-hermes-continuity, MEM-RTE-tau-handoff, MEM-RTE-trace-archive, and MEM-RTE-note-withdrawal.

Read-back direction and signal. Requested retrieval and automatic host supply are separate operations within their chains. Coarse eligibility and budget filters are distinguished from actual branch/repository identity selection. Prompt-driven search does not by itself establish lexical, embedding or judgment selection; the affected signal units remain partial. OpenClaw's fixed task/recent-activity selector supports its narrower coarse finding. See MEM-RTE-note-reload, RT-RTE-context-build, RT-RTE-pi-checkpoint, RT-RTE-hook-checkpoint, MEM-RTE-tau-handoff, and MEM-RTE-openclaw-context.

Trace learning and source. Automatic Pi, hook, Tau and Hermes writes connect conversational experience to durable context with later consumers. They support local wired yes findings under the profile definition without establishing improved capacity. Original conversational inputs support session-log findings; lifecycle callback triggers do not add event-stream sources. Reflection retains a claimed positive with unresolved original source kinds. OpenClaw child-note readers and other incomplete qualifying routes remain uncertain. See the checkpoint and handoff records above, MEM-RTE-hermes-continuity, and EPI-RTE-reflect-notes.

The workflow delivery account distinguishes parseable capture output from verified write success and context supply from actual use. Stored-case rejudging likewise establishes no production-update loop (EPI-RTE-qa-judge). The profile preserves these distinctions. All axes remain partial, with unresolved alternatives explicitly retained. Local known findings do not assert deployment, observed benefit, system-wide absence or exhaustive coverage. No remaining objection meets the blocker threshold, and the faithfully scoped uncertainties require no additional verification limit.

Blockers

none

Limits

none