Integrator assignment

Read completely kb/work/open-ended-work-economics/curiosity-exploration/README.md, kb/work/open-ended-work-economics/bootstrap-exploration/second-exploration-brief.md, kb/work/open-ended-work-economics/README.md, AGENTS.md and kb/work/COLLECTION.md. These bind purpose, scope, evidence, coordination, acceptance and stop conditions. No code, experiments, implementation, commits, extraction, deletion or library/index edits. No new source destination allocated; return ungrounded literature leads as leads, not source-backed conclusions. Existing grounded Quotes may support claims; source analysis is not support. Only A turn 1 had source mutation ownership. Choose methods and research judgments within scope; escalate purpose/authority changes, return partial on missing evidence/tools. Validate owned result. Distinguish source claims, documentary observations, conjectures and demonstrations; preserve strongest rival, discriminating evidence, recoverability needs and reason for parked alternatives. Keep learning value distinct from task benefit; do not force compression scores, text shortening or service-first admission. Fresh integrator turn 3. Read current coordination, both explorers and critic, previous integrations. Own only kb/work/open-ended-work-economics/curiosity-exploration/turn-03/integration.md. No delegation. Integrate actual changes rather than redescribing existing doctrine. Decide which positive steering mechanisms survive, where bounded clarification ends and continuation needs new evidence, and what remains unsolved about choosing unfamiliar directions. Recommend consequential next question that connects inquiry progress to acquisition/retention and forgetting, not a schema. Explicitly state selected vs strongest alternative and purpose served/untouched. 1000-1500 words.