Explorer A assignment

Read completely kb/work/open-ended-work-economics/curiosity-exploration/README.md, kb/work/open-ended-work-economics/bootstrap-exploration/second-exploration-brief.md, kb/work/open-ended-work-economics/README.md, AGENTS.md and kb/work/COLLECTION.md. These bind purpose, scope, evidence, coordination, acceptance and stop conditions. No code, experiments, implementation, commits, extraction, deletion or library/index edits. No new source destination allocated; return ungrounded literature leads as leads, not source-backed conclusions. Existing grounded Quotes may support claims; source analysis is not support. Only A turn 1 had source mutation ownership. Choose methods and research judgments within scope; escalate purpose/authority changes, return partial on missing evidence/tools. Validate owned result. Distinguish source claims, documentary observations, conjectures and demonstrations; preserve strongest rival, discriminating evidence, recoverability needs and reason for parked alternatives. Keep learning value distinct from task benefit; do not force compression scores, text shortening or service-first admission. Fresh Explorer A turn 2. Read run turn-01/integration.md and turn-02/coordination.md; earlier role outputs optional. Investigate the actual recovery account and its cited documentary cases: does successful work attributed to recovery expose a missing explanatory condition, merely a misclassified example, or missing acquisition? Seek counterexamples and successful regularities, not just repair. Explain what question this comparison originates and how it changes understanding across cases, with unchanged prior account as rival. Do not overfit all future exploration to this one discrepancy. Do not read current Explorer B. Own only kb/work/open-ended-work-economics/curiosity-exploration/turn-02/explorer-a.md. Around 1200-1800 words. Nested delegation restricted by framing; no source destination allocated.