Explorer A assignment

You are fresh Explorer A for turn 1. Read completely kb/work/open-ended-work-economics/curiosity-exploration/README.md, ../bootstrap-exploration/second-exploration-brief.md (resolved relative to that run), parent workshop README, and turn-01/coordination.md. Follow their authority, evidence and acceptance boundaries. Your question: what does the priority Formal Theory of Creativity actually supply about progress approximations, opposing predictions, internal computational outcomes, recent-history limits, and question origination? Critically translate into candidate positive steering for qualitative KB work, comparing the Driven by Compression Progress source where useful. Read cp-skill-ground and ground source-dependent claims before authoring them. You exclusively own Quotes additions to kb/sources/schmidhuber-formal-theory-creativity.ingest.md through that workflow; no other existing source mutation. No new source-ingest destination allocated: return leads rather than silently creating one. You own only turn-01/explorer-a.md in this run plus that explicit grounding exception. Do not read current explorer B. Methods and consequential research judgments are yours within purpose, not authority changes. Return partial if evidence/tool blocked, name strongest alternative and remaining question, validate output. Keep result substantial but focused (roughly 1200-1800 words maximum unless evidence requires otherwise). No experiments/code/commits/extraction/deletion; nested delegation only bounded sequential ingest as framing, never other research workers.