Workshop: Full ARIS Trial
Question
Can we run ARIS as a full paper-production workflow inside commonplace without exposing premature drafts, and what kind of paper should the trial attempt?
Privacy Boundary
The public workshop records framing, candidate topics, decisions, and lessons learned. The ARIS project roots live under:
kb/work/aris-full-trial/private/
That directory is gitignored. It may contain research-wiki/, idea-stage/, refine-logs/, review-stage/, paper/, figures/, MANIFEST.md, .aris/, traces, and paper drafts.
Trial Project Roots
Two parallel ARIS project roots are available:
kb/work/aris-full-trial/private/bounded-context-paper/
kb/work/aris-full-trial/private/agent-memory-review-paper/
Both can use ARIS's normal root-relative layout without polluting the main repo root.
Candidate Directions
See paper-candidates.md.
Current Lean
The agent-memory review paper is probably the better first full-ARIS trial:
- It uses already accumulated review material.
- It is less sensitive than the bounded-context orchestration model.
- It naturally fits a survey / systematization-of-knowledge paper type.
- ARIS Research Wiki's papers/ideas/claims structure should help organize many practical systems.
The bounded-context paper remains valuable, but should stay private until the argument is more mature.
Closure
This workshop closes when we either:
- Complete a full ARIS paper trial and extract lessons about using ARIS inside commonplace.
- Decide ARIS is too paper-specific for our workflows and retain only selected mechanisms.
- Promote a publication plan into a separate paper workshop with a clear privacy/publication policy.