llm-wiki profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes in the profile, including scope, natural units, findings, evidence bases and inventory coverage, against the handed reports and reconciliation. The Access-Log citations use canonical MEM-OBJ-access-log. The valid epistemic containers do not displace the finer memory parts. No source read, new evidence or quotation was needed.

The supplied correction answer resolves the previous representational-form blocker. The corrected profile removes the symbolic/wired finding for initialization inputs and its dependent rationale. MEM-OBJ-config and RT-RTE-wiki-setup establish production of retained configuration, not executable later consumption of that configuration. The remaining natural-language finding concerns model-mediated later consumption. Unknown external L1 transformations remain unresolved rather than being classified from readable summaries. The repair changes the unsupported finding without erasing supported file-consumption findings.

Storage covers current state, History, live and archived routing, logs, Dashboard, configuration and L1 files, with optional Git retention classified separately. Its known assessment concerns substrate, not actual contents, provenance or deployed host loading. Executable setup supports only its local wired findings; prescribed maintenance remains claimed. See MEM-OBJ-page-state, MEM-OBJ-page-history, MEM-OBJ-hub-archive, MEM-OBJ-dashboard and RT-RTE-wiki-setup.

Lineage separates acquisition, compilation, read traces and subsequent approved revisions from unknown initial L1 provenance. Behavioral authority distinguishes knowledge at synthesis, ranking at query selection, routing at command dispatch and review, and afforded standing instructions at external L1 consumers. These findings do not infer enforcement or validation from dates or credential references. Unknown host payloads remain included as unresolved units. See MEM-OBJ-hub-index, MEM-OBJ-l1-rules, MEM-OBJ-l1-index, MEM-BAP-wiki-answer and MEM-BAP-l1-loading.

Write agency distinguishes automatic model admission, content-specific human approval, interactive settings and software template admission, while leaving generic direct-caller settings and initial L1 admission unresolved. The conflicting automatic re-promotion claim is retained only at claimed strength. Curation follows the described transformations: revision, withdrawal with history, compression, salience changes and approved L1 maintenance. No novel synthesis is inferred from a command name. Grouped units retain the relevant admission and transformation distinctions in their findings and notes. See RT-RTE-source-ingest, RT-RTE-wiki-query, RT-RTE-index-prune, RT-RTE-l1-verification, RT-RTE-health-maintenance and EPI-CLM-automatic-repromotion.

Read-back direction preserves requested selection and delivery as pull, and the documented external standing-memory role as afforded push. Read-back signal assigns coarse selection only to the described automatic index availability; unknown body/description selection remains unresolved. Requested page identifiers and model ranking are not misclassified as push signals. See RT-RTE-wiki-query and MEM-BAP-l1-loading.

Trace-learning and trace-source assessments emit no unsupported positive or negative. Raw access logging is not equated with durable automatic behavior adaptation, and human-approved demotion is not equated with automatic admission. The conflicting re-promotion claim, unspecified source inputs and initial L1 production remain unresolved rather than being suppressed to assert absence or source inapplicability. See MEM-OBJ-access-log, RT-RTE-index-prune, EPI-CLM-automatic-repromotion and MEM-OBJ-l1-rules. These faithfully scoped uncertainties do not require additional publication limits. None of the findings establishes observed compliance, activation or benefit.

Blockers

none

Limits

none