Autogenesis memory profile

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-memory-profile.md

Comparison rationale

This profile classifies the accepted records, not new source evidence. Every positive finding is wired implementation evidence, not observed operation or causal benefit. All ten axes remain partial: the reports explicitly retain untraced alternatives, initial-content questions and missing consumer paths. A complete classification of a named local part is not a complete inventory of the system.

Retained parts and consumer boundaries

The RAM tiers, their JSON/HTML display, the separate todo files and executable checkpoints are different objects. Tier persistence does not establish disk-to-model reload, while the todo reader does reread disk. The summary route does qualify as trace learning because the automatic trace-derived result survives into a later model invocation; this does not assert improved capacity. The compacting model receives experience with learning authority, and the foreground model receives its result as knowledge. See MEM-RTE-tier-context, MEM-OBJ-working-memory, MEM-BAP-memory-guidance and MEM-RTE-todo-context.

Corpus texts are retained ranking inputs even though scoring code is fixed. BM25 and TF-IDF do not establish a persistent embedding store or a parametric memory update. Query fulfillment is pull; it does not contribute an inferred-lexical push finding. Workflow normalization preserves the returned data, but automatic Agent model injection is not established. See MEM-OBJ-corpus, EPI-RTE-corpus-ranking and RT-RTE-knowledge-admission.

Automatic per-turn model-context supply is distinguished from the context builder's internal get/content requests. The actual context-ID match selects retained parts delivered to a foreground model; count tails and whole-file availability are separate coarse selectors. Mount-time replay similarly distinguishes explicit server requests from automatic latest-record choice. Startup extension loading is automatic supply of retained source, not an explicit later tool invocation. Its signal remains not-determinable: iterating active catalog entries and loading their paths does not establish an identity match against a selection input. No controlled signal is inferred from the catalog identifiers alone. See MEM-RTE-tier-context, MEM-RTE-todo-context, MEM-RTE-client-replay and RT-OBJ-extension-manifest.

Executable extension bodies have symbolic form and a live execution path, but arbitrary executable behavior is not itself one of the controlled authority values. Their active identity metadata has a supported routing effect. Workflow recovery fields additionally validate and veto mismatched resume requests. These distinct forces do not establish an approval or quality guarantee for all runtime effects. See RT-OBJ-extension-source, RT-BAP-extension-execution, RT-OBJ-workflow-checkpoint and RT-RTE-workflow-execution.

Transformations and unresolved alternatives

Compaction implements consolidation even though semantic fidelity is unverified. No concrete new claim is needed for consolidation, and a possible fidelity defect does not establish synthesis. Bounded queues/deletion implement forgetting; versioned replacement and withdrawal support evolve/invalidate. Staging promotion does not by its name establish raised memory tier or salience. Duplicate-run rejection and index reconstruction do not establish dedup. See MEM-RTE-tier-context, MEM-RTE-todo-context, RT-RTE-capability-admission and EPI-RTE-workflow-evidence.

Generic caller identity does not establish manual control. Model-generated admissions and automatic lifecycle writes are positively classified; initial/admin edits, corpus callers and external file replacements retain their unresolved control facts. Feedback retention and trajectory export do not demonstrate a training consumer. Neither uninspected custom backends nor detailed canvas/notebook persistence can be classified through the inspected display or registry. See RT-RTE-runtime-configuration, MEM-RTE-memory-admission, MEM-OBJ-run-records and MEM-OBJ-corpus.

Trace-source findings classify original content: recorded user task text is conversational input; tool/action feedback is execution trace content; lifecycle start/stop observations are discrete runtime events. Their common hook envelope does not merge these origins. Prior-summary and service/child output provenance remains mixed; persisted trajectories do not imply that the compactor consumes linked state/action/outcome trajectories. See MEM-OBJ-recent-history and MEM-OBJ-working-memory.

Canonical resolution and source-read log

Reconciliation resolves the duplicate corpus object to MEM-OBJ-corpus, the duplicate history-summary route to MEM-RTE-tier-context, the duplicate evaluation object to MEM-OBJ-workflow-evaluations, and the evaluation-maintenance route to EPI-RTE-workflow-evidence. The profile cites those canonical records. These identity supersessions do not strengthen a basis or resolve summary fidelity, source warrant or caller quality. The epistemic combined history container remains valid; recent/working parts retain their different producers. Runtime task, corpus and workflow containers remain distinct from their material parts.

No frozen-source reads were performed for this classification. All warrants are supplied accepted records and their annotations; no new record, quotation or evidence is introduced.