Dynamic Cheatsheet reconciliation

Type: agentic-systems/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

The prior reconciliation's dispositions remain supported. The Part of: relations resolve to declared containers: MEM-OBJ-2 and MEM-OBJ-3 are distinct material parts of RT-OBJ-2; MEM-RTE-1 is a memory-specific part of RT-RTE-1; and MEM-RTE-2, MEM-RTE-3 and MEM-RTE-4 are distinct routes within RT-RTE-2. Their different forms, consumers and operations support keeping both containers. No split supersession is warranted. EPI-OBJ-1 and EPI-OBJ-2 are the current answer and scoring target, not duplicates of retained memory. EPI-RTE-1 is post-answer scoring, not a duplicate of generation, admission or selection. RT-RTE-3/RT-BAP-1 and RT-RTE-4/RT-BAP-2 retain distinct local and provider-side execution referents.

The previous reconciliation's returned profile corrections are present in memory-report-1. The storage_substrate.files evidence cites MEM-OBJ-3 for checked-in embedding CSVs. curation_operations.synthesize cites MEM-RTE-4. No further correction or duplicate supersession is established.

The memory-comparison profile was checked axis by axis against the runtime, memory and epistemic records, including EPI-RTE-1's transformation and scoring of answer content. That route neither transforms retained memory nor feeds its result into memory admission or later selection, so it does not add a memory-profile value. The profile's storage substrates and forms match MEM-OBJ-1, MEM-OBJ-2 and MEM-OBJ-3 and their runtime containers; its partial lineage assessment preserves the unknown origins of supplied initialization and embeddings. Its knowledge, ranking and routing values match the respective text and embedding consumers. Learning is confined to the automatic trace-fed, persisted text routes MEM-RTE-1 and MEM-RTE-4; EPI-RTE-1's score does not feed those routes. Automatic and manual write agency, the four declared curation operations, pull and push direction, coarse and inferred-embedding push signals, trace-learning yes, and session-log/tool-trace sources are supported by the cited routes and annotations. Tool-trace support remains conditional on execution feedback entering retained generator outputs. No unsupported profile strengthening or omitted memory value is indicated by EPI-RTE-1.

Runtime and epistemic members independently converge that task-target scoring follows cheatsheet adoption and does not gate memory admission (RT-RTE-1, EPI-RTE-1; SRC-1 run_benchmark.py). The target is an answer-scoring reference, not a memory-admission oracle. This convergence concerns inspected implementation only; it establishes neither an observed run nor memory correctness.

The member record identities and references resolve: source IDs cite the supplied Source register; runtime, memory and epistemic IDs cited above are declared or annotated in their named members. The verification and set check report no further identity, source-anchor, part-relation, or memory-profile blockers.

Unresolved conflict: EPI-RTE-1 and the shipped dynamic_cheatsheet/utils/sonnet_eval.py helper identify an evaluator-coverage limit: the helper exists in the frozen target (SRC-1 dynamic_cheatsheet/utils/sonnet_eval.py), but no caller is evidenced and the epistemic member's coverage account does not delimit its “no other operative route” conclusion against it. The available records do not establish whether this standalone checker participates in any shipped epistemic route. Therefore completeness of evaluator coverage across the whole-system boundary, including whether the helper supplies a material check, remains unresolved; this reconciliation cannot amend the epistemic member in the after-blockers round.