Dynamic Cheatsheet reconciliation

Type: agentic-systems/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-2 supersedes Part of: RT-OBJ-2 with Part of: MEM-OBJ-1. The supplied memory record identifies the paired prior input/output examples, of which prior input strings are a material part; the runtime record remains their valid broader container. Evidence: SRC-1 at dynamic_cheatsheet/language_model.py and the identity of MEM-OBJ-1. Affected finding: epistemic member, Epistemic-object inventory and Authority-route ledger.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-3 supersedes Part of: RT-OBJ-2 with Part of: MEM-OBJ-1. The supplied memory record identifies the paired prior input/output examples, of which prior output strings are a material part; the runtime record remains their valid broader container. Evidence: SRC-1 at dynamic_cheatsheet/language_model.py and the identity of MEM-OBJ-1. Affected finding: epistemic member, Epistemic-object inventory and Authority-route ledger.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-4 is superseded by MEM-OBJ-2. Both records identify the same caller-supplied original_input_embeddings matrix, including its current-query row and earlier candidate rows; the memory record is the canonical identity. Evidence: SRC-1 at dynamic_cheatsheet/language_model.py. Affected findings: epistemic member, Epistemic-object inventory and all Authority-route ledger rows citing EPI-OBJ-4. The superseded ID remains declared and resolves within the set.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-8 supersedes Part of: RT-OBJ-1 with Distinct identity comparison: RT-OBJ-1 identifies the current or returned cumulative cheatsheet, while EPI-OBJ-8 identifies the curator's proposed response substring before admission. Successful extraction can make that literal string the next current sheet, but proposal status alone does not establish containment. The extraction code receives the model response and selects a substring; the cumulative route separately passes that proposal through extraction before assigning it to the current sheet. Evidence: SRC-1 at dynamic_cheatsheet/utils/extractor.py and dynamic_cheatsheet/language_model.py. Affected findings: epistemic member, EPI-OBJ-8 declaration and the inventory and ledger distinctions between candidate production and admission.

The runtime and memory findings on RT-OBJ-2 are compatible. RT-OBJ-2 remains the broad container; MEM-OBJ-1 groups the paired text examples and MEM-OBJ-2 identifies the embedding matrix. EPI-OBJ-2 and EPI-OBJ-3 identify the distinct input and output content within MEM-OBJ-1. Their different granularity does not establish duplicate identities. EPI-OBJ-5 and EPI-OBJ-6 likewise remain distinct parts of the heterogeneous RT-OBJ-4 container.

For RT-RTE-2, the memory annotation supplies a route detail omitted from the runtime record: the curator receives previous_cheatsheet in its prompt, while extraction uses the formatted retrieval view curated_cheatsheet as its missing-tag fallback. The returned fallback is therefore the retrieval view, not the prior cumulative sheet. This is supported by SRC-1 at dynamic_cheatsheet/language_model.py and dynamic_cheatsheet/utils/extractor.py, and by the memory member's annotation on RT-RTE-2. Preserve this distinction in integration; it does not require an amendment to a conflicting runtime value.

The direct-client search route EPI-RTE-1 is a distinct search-enabled path within the broad client surface RT-RTE-6. It adds Tavily prompt insertion and provider-native search request wiring; it does not establish another retained-memory route. Its owner remains the epistemic member because it supplies the source-inspected search behavior absent from the runtime account. Evidence: SRC-1 at text_generation/simple_unified_client.py.

The memory-comparison profile remains consistent with the full set after the EPI-OBJ-8 relation correction. Axis by axis: storage_substrate is partial with in-memory, because caller persistence and the documented CLI path lack registered implementation evidence; representational_form is known as natural-language and parametric, covering the scoped cheatsheet/examples and vectors; lineage is partial with authored and trace-extracted, because the supplied corpus and vector origins are unknown; behavioral_authority is partial with knowledge, ranking and learning, while external template contents do not establish whether sheet text acts as instruction; write_agency is known as automatic and manual; curation_operations remains not-determinable, because tag extraction does not establish the model's content operation; read_back_direction is known as pull and push; read_back_signal is known as inferred-embedding; trace_learning is known as yes on an afforded basis through caller resubmission; and trace_source is known as session-logs for the query/answer episode feeding the cumulative update. EPI-OBJ-8's non-ampliative reshaping classification describes literal extraction from model response text, not the unknown operation that produced the proposed content retained as a later sheet. The profile does not assert observed improvement or silently strengthen that finding.

No unresolved conflict remains. No finding is returned to the memory analyst.