Claude Code dynamic workflows memory profile

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-memory-profile.md

Comparison rationale

All positive findings have a claimed basis. The accepted records derive from doctrine/design in the frozen documentation capture, not inspected implementation, execution or causal evidence; see RT-RTE-run-replay and MEM-RTE-prefix-reuse. Complete classification of a narrow documented unit does not upgrade its evidence strength. The axis notes retain unresolved included alternatives rather than using one documented route as a complete system inventory.

Reconciliation supplies no supersessions. The runtime result container and its research-claim part remain separately usable, as do script control and embedded task guidance. Cache prefixes are not worker-result memory. Their identity and configuration matching do not establish semantic relevance, shared findings or provider parameter learning. The scope includes settings only where choices persist or change through use, not the entirety of shipped configuration.

Read-back distinguishes requested returns from independent automatic supply. A named script requested by the consumer is pull; a filename alone does not justify identifier push. Relaunch likewise requests recovery of retained run results. Selection and substitution of the compatible completed prefix fulfill that request, without requiring a separate request for each value. Order, prompt equality and failure state govern reuse but establish neither another push operation nor a replay push-signal finding. Cache and scoped-control supply independently retain their push and matching-signal classifications. Availability, TTL and hold budgets do not become semantic selection signals. These distinctions rest on RT-RTE-run-replay, MEM-RTE-prefix-reuse and MEM-OBJ-workflow-settings.

Logical suffix invalidation, script revision and prefix expiry are distinct curation routes. None proves consolidation, synthesis of a novel retained claim or improved future capacity. Research-report synthesis is a source-native label, not evidence that its propositions are absent from its inputs. Current-result truthiness filtering is not, by itself, maintenance over retained memory; see EPI-RTE-result-filter and EPI-RTE-report-disposition.

No positive trace-learning classification is supported by the accepted records. No local or system-wide no is asserted either: the members declare no bounded absence record, original worker input coverage is incomplete, and usage-wait checkpoints and raw tool/transcript retention remain unresolved. Automatic result persistence and later replay establish durable task-output reuse, not automatically a qualifying trace-fed derivation. If a later retained continuation summary were established, its trace-fed write and later consumer would need their own classification; transcript discard in one restart route cannot exclude that alternative. See RT-OBJ-agent-results, RT-RTE-agent-recovery and RT-RTE-script-admission.

Source-read log: no frozen source was read for this profile. All classifications use supplied accepted records and annotations. No evidence or record was added, and report verification was not reopened.