WikiBrain reconciliation

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

Shared boundary and record identities

All four reports retain the revision and run identity in boundary. They describe implementation and doctrine/design within that boundary, not an observed deployment or causal comparison. No correction answers or refusal were supplied. This reconciliation uses the supplied members only; no source ambiguity required an additional source read.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-raw is superseded by MEM-OBJ-raw. Both identify the retained raw source pages created through renderSource/saveSource/createNote in SRC-1 src/import.ts and consumed through the note functions in src/notes.ts. The epistemic record's reference to snapshots adds a persistence relation, not a different source-content referent. Its import-fidelity and unknown-warrant findings remain applicable to these pages. The memory record additionally distinguishes archival visibility and direct-create provenance; neither report treats raw as proof of complete original capture or source truth.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-wiki is superseded by MEM-OBJ-wiki. Both identify the same wiki-layer summaries, concepts, syntheses, query pages and lint pages, stored through SRC-1 src/notes.ts under the general template's wiki contract. The epistemic record names snapshots and derived tables as supporting storage, not a second wiki. The affected findings concern candidate content entering retention and later consumption without retention itself establishing acceptance. The memory record's distinctions among catalog, knowledge and narrated reasons remain in place; this identity does not make every wiki page share one consumer or authority.

No further record identities are established. In particular:

Independent convergence and integration dispositions

Rule ownership and enforcement. The memory and workflow reports retain the runtime's distinction between RT-CLM-schema-guard, literal-prefix denial and RT-RTE-schema-spelling. The epistemic claim comparison uses the same countercase. This is a source claim versus implementation mismatch, not a disagreement between reports. Broader authorized client writes remain distinct from the automatic spelling route. All reports leave emitted inputs, model compliance and later behavioral activation unobserved.

Admission, checks and completion. The workflow's annotation on ingest agrees with RT-RTE-ingest-job: operation-level vetoes and per-page persistence do not verify the requested multi-page compilation. The epistemic ledger separately distinguishes candidate production, operational admission, retention and acceptance. Its structural and semantic check records preserve different evaluator domains rather than assigning the strongest status to lint as a whole. The workflow's terminal browser refresh on both success and failure explains how partial changes become visible; it does not strengthen job completion into semantic success. These findings connect without requiring a correction.

Pending state and retrieval. MEM-OBJ-links-tags explains the derived metadata used by EPI-RTE-pending-selection. Both identify a live wiki backlink as the scheduling predicate, not evidence of adequate compilation. The memory retrieval account and runtime instruction path agree that the pending prelude is automatic selection inside a requested response, not a compulsory preflight or unsolicited preload. Lexical search, catalog-first guidance and all-schema delivery retain their separate budgets and enforcement limits.

Trace retention and context. Memory annotations on provider models and job events agree with the runtime and workflow: current-run tool outputs reach the model in full, while persisted event outputs are clipped. Later chat history carries role/content prose without prior tool bodies. The memory report further distinguishes unsliced finalText delivered to chat from the clipped job result; this refines checkpoint lineage without contradicting the runtime's job-result limit. Discussion guidance is an additional bounded transcript projection, not evidence that the entire tool episode or all its reasons survive.

Withdrawal and recovery. MEM-RTE-state-withdrawal elaborates per-page rollback, archive, soft deletion, reset and purge. The epistemic recovery ledger cites RT-RTE-client-tools while describing shared note operations; the memory report clarifies that not all maintenance operations are MCP tools. The ledger itself names shared note callers and the coverage table includes REST dispatch, so these are overlapping scope descriptions, not contrary interface inventories. Both reports distinguish visibility changes from retraction of dependent claims. Snapshot expiry and surviving conversation/export copies limit recovery and erasure conclusions rather than contradicting per-note transaction guarantees.

Attachments and public delivery. MEM-OBJ-assets qualifies the source comment about later model image access: the inspected built-in input path carries Markdown links, while MEM-RTE-human-delivery establishes browser/share/export delivery. No other report asserts binary model delivery. This remains a local source-claim qualification, with external multimodal behavior unresolved, not a cross-report conflict.

No unresolved disagreement between the supplied reports is established. No required undeclared part is identified by their integration findings. Uninspected scenario rules, conversion internals, provider behavior and external orchestration retain their stated scope limits; they are not evidenced absences. The public compounding and health-check claims in EPI-CLM-compiling-compounds and EPI-CLM-health-check remain distinct from the rule-edit claim. Across the reports, persistent reuse and requested checking do not by themselves establish accepted claims, reliable criticism, improved future capacity or exercised self-improvement. This common limitation neither removes the implemented routes nor supplies a system-wide negative about unassessed paths.