Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep memory-profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked every axis, its local findings and evidence bases, its natural units and its coverage assessment in the handed profile against the supplied accepted records. Reconciliation's object supersessions are respected: classifications use MEM-OBJ-claims and MEM-OBJ-query-pack, while graph storage and the construction and consumption routes remain distinct. No target source files were read, and no records or quotations were added.

The predecessor's representational-form objection is repaired. Staged patch syntax now has a separate claimed symbolic finding; provenance receipt fields retain wired symbolic form. Both units, the axis note and the rationale preserve this distinction. RT-OBJ-skill supports the proposed unified-diff representation, while RT-RTE-meta-landing distinguishes the model-followed proposal procedure from inspected receipt stamping. Receipt implementation no longer upgrades patch production. The correction answer describes the actual changes rather than substituting for their support.

Storage substrate and representational form. File findings distinguish implemented wiki, event, iteration and access-metadata persistence from procedural reviewer, compact, proposal and skill-replacement writes. Logical graph organization is not treated as a separate database. Mixed prose and fixed-rule fields have separate form units, including compact configurations and commands, graph triples and receipt hashes. The external conversation payload remains uninspected rather than being classified from its readable final reply. These choices agree with MEM-OBJ-edges, MEM-OBJ-compact-files, MEM-OBJ-events, RT-OBJ-run-state and RT-RTE-codex-call. Grouped local file witnesses share classification and coverage; they do not establish complete system storage coverage.

Lineage. The profile separates imported metadata, model-authored content, trace-derived judgments and deterministic compilation. Generic caller fields and initial relationship evidence remain unresolved; a known rendering or subsequent transformation does not resolve their origins. Candidate condensation is not automatically labelled trace extraction, and findings production remains uninspected. The distinctions follow MEM-RTE-paper-capture, MEM-RTE-evaluation-write, MEM-RTE-compact-recovery and RT-RTE-meta-landing.

Behavioral authority. Findings name retained parts, consumers and effects. Outcome fields select projection inputs; failed-idea context influences ideation priority; phase policy selects resume; and receipt fields/hash determine local curation eligibility. The model-interpreted banlist is not assigned code-enforcement strength. Learning authority at a memory-update or maintenance consumer is distinguished from downstream knowledge and standing skill instructions. Support comes from MEM-RTE-pack-read, EPI-RTE-query-consumption, MEM-RTE-reviewer-memory, RT-RTE-phase-resume, RT-RTE-meta-landing and RT-BAP-skill-instructions. Unresolved quarantine and provider consumers are not assigned authority merely because content persists.

Write agency and curation operations. Software/model admission is separated from explicit human patch selection and landing; workflow initiation and physical I/O do not settle admission control. Generic direct callers remain unresolved. Pack excerpting supports wired consolidation; compact condensation supports claimed consolidation. Page replacement and procedural skill edits support evolution at their respective bases. Retraction expresses requested withdrawal without claiming cascading graph repair. Collision suppression is not upgraded to deduplication, and generated prose is not sufficient evidence of synthesis. Reviewer-derived memory retains no positive curation operation because derivation and append/replay do not establish reduction of existing claims. These classifications follow MEM-RTE-evaluation-write, EPI-RTE-wiki-retention, MEM-RTE-compact-recovery, MEM-RTE-reviewer-memory and RT-RTE-meta-landing.

Read-back direction and signal. Requested wiki, thread, ledger and metadata retrieval remain pull operations. Automatic next-round full-memory supply and compact-context selection have separate claimed push findings. Their signals name triggers, backend/difficulty or availability inputs, and the selected retained material. Coarse selection is not upgraded to identifier matching merely because a file has a name. Requested file access is not confused with the automatic full-text injection branch. These distinctions are supported by MEM-RTE-pack-read, MEM-RTE-reviewer-memory, MEM-RTE-compact-recovery, MEM-RTE-stall-pivot and RT-RTE-codex-call. Local pull-only signal assessments do not settle opaque provider alternatives.

Trace learning and trace source. The positive findings identify automatic trace-fed writes, durable context/guidance and later consumers: experiment summaries, reviewer-derived memory, evaluation-derived outcomes and maintenance-cycle evidence. They do not assert measured improvement or infer learning from raw logging alone. Human-adopted live skill replacement is separate from automatic proposal/ledger production. Original inputs distinguish experiment feedback, reviewer-session content and the mixed lifecycle, tool and prompt origins of usage summaries; serialization alone supplies no source classification. The claimed chains are supported by MEM-RTE-compact-recovery, MEM-RTE-reviewer-memory, EPI-RTE-result-integration, MEM-OBJ-events and RT-RTE-meta-landing. Ordinary counters/access metadata are not turned into an unsupported negative.

All ten axes remain partial, preserving unresolved caller provenance, opaque provider state, findings production and remaining maintenance/platform routes. These are explicit uncertainty rather than absence or complete enumeration. Local known findings classify their named branches at their stated evidence bases, not successful deployment or compliance. The accepted records support the emitted comparison findings within those bounds. The inspected qualifications require no additional publication limit, and no material unsupported value, evidence-strength assignment or coverage assertion remains.

Blockers

none

Limits

none