OpenKB report verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

Evidence boundary and record dispositions

I read the complete supplied boundary, four analyst reports, reconciliation, correction answers, report-check and previous verification. The structural report is none; there are no structural failures to route. The runtime answer is an argument checked against the changed report and source, not assumed proof of repair. The other answer files are empty.

Independent inspection used only SRC-1 at the revision in the Source register. Git HEAD matched that revision and status was clean. The tracked top-level tree agrees with the boundary inventory. The whole-system classification remains supported: shipped drivers produce, maintain and later consume wiki, session and artifact state. No evidence contradicts the target or boundary kind. No target code, tests, examples, models or services were executed. Source text supplies implementation and doctrine/design, not observed operation or causal benefit.

I assessed every declaration and annotation, its retained source anchors and evidence status, and the reconciliation's identity and conflict dispositions. This judges support and scope rather than repeating code's quotation-occurrence or link-resolution checks. The components describe external inference/PageIndex interfaces, not inspected provider weights or an inferred embedding store. Runtime's schema and wiki-body objects, six routes, product/trust claims and two instruction-authority paths preserve their different consumers and force. All route operation statuses appropriately remain uninspected. No report declares an evidenced absence requiring a system-complete negative search.

Memory's source content, page metadata, catalog, registry, explorations, session history/display, generated package, saved evaluation set, snapshots, diagnostics and graph retain different lineage or consumers. Its page-edit, evaluator and external-host routes add distinct operations rather than redeclaring runtime routes. Epistemic's source, summary, concept, entity, answer, report, skill and question/label objects separate candidate content from structural controls. Its six finer routes distinguish advisory semantic checks, enforcing link/source cleanup, reference generation and the two graders. Workflow's CLI delivery claim concerns the outer overwrite/status contract, not another declaration of the inner deck route.

Every explicit Part of: relation is supported: summary/concept/entity bodies belong to the runtime body container; semantic lint and source withdrawal belong to maintenance. Link cleanup spans several callers and correctly claims no single parent. Reconciliation's sole supersession connects the same imported Markdown, page JSON and image artifacts in EPI-OBJ-source-content and MEM-OBJ-source-content, without replacing findings about unknown warrant or fidelity. Its other overlaps preserve valid containers, partial content selections, checkpoints and distinct consumers. No further supersession or missing material part is necessary for the emitted bounded findings.

Independent behavior checks

  • Compilation and admission: SRC-1, openkb/agent/compiler.py short/long entries, malformed-plan returns, collected page exceptions and source-removal routines, together with openkb/add_coordinator.py, support RT-RTE-document-add and its memory/epistemic qualifications. Short compilation loads converted source text; long compilation loads the retained summary and generates an overview. An unparseable plan can update the index and return normally; individual page failures can be omitted. Snapshot completion responds to propagated errors, not semantic completeness. Hash admission therefore does not certify all proposed pages or true knowledge. openkb/indexer.py independently confirms the cloud-page empty/error fallback to local extraction; neither path establishes extraction fidelity.
  • Retrieval and grants: SRC-1, openkb/agent/query.py and openkb/agent/tools.py expose a string-path reader with no suffix restriction. A supported in-root source JSON path reaches a whole-file read independently of the page-range tool. RT-RTE-wiki-query's alternate affordance is reachable, but not an observed model bypass. Write containment and prefix checks apply to the shared helper under the stated stable-filesystem condition, not every writer or an OS sandbox. The actual chat tools add constrained writing and skill loading, not shell execution or generic output reads. Discovery in openkb/agent/skills.py is first-hit-wins and generation alone does not establish installation.
  • Conversation retention: SRC-1, openkb/agent/chat_session.py recursively replaces image data URLs with text hints, retaining other SDK history under that transformation. openkb/agent/chat.py composes saved history plus new input and separately filters read calls for the display trace. MEM-OBJ-session-history and MEM-OBJ-session-display are therefore distinct operative parts. Neither semantic compaction nor a hard model-context volume bound follows.
  • Withdrawal and manual edits: SRC-1, openkb/agent/compiler.py removes source membership and selected references without regenerating surviving multisource prose. The epistemic counterexample uses ordinary supported inline source lists; it is not merely a type-level possibility. openkb/page_ops.py separately preserves existing frontmatter when replacing the body. EPI-RTE-source-withdrawal, MEM-RTE-page-edit and the metadata freshness qualification remain supported. Structural withdrawal is not proposition-complete erasure.
  • Checks and their consumers: SRC-1, openkb/agent/linter.py grants list/read tools, not semantic repair writes. openkb/skill/evaluator.py and the complete CLI eval dispatcher in openkb/cli.py distinguish description-only triggering from body/reference-prefix support judgments. Ambiguous trigger output falls back to no-trigger; coverage ambiguity and exceptions are excluded from its scoring denominator. Only optional question/expected-label groups persist through the inspected save operation. MEM-RTE-skill-eval, EPI-RTE-eval-set, EPI-RTE-trigger-grade and EPI-RTE-body-grade establish diagnostics, not executed task success or automatic successor admission.
  • Generation and delivery: SRC-1, openkb/skill/creator.py independently confirms the nested question-only query without credential-bundle forwarding. openkb/skill/generator.py retains validation and regenerates the marketplace without rejecting errors. openkb/agent/skill_runner.py, openkb/deck/creator.py and CLI deck_new confirm artifact-mediated handoff, fresh runs, validation before optional critic writes, ignored critic return and no final wrapper revalidation. WF-CLM-cli-delivery correctly separates retained files from successful command status. The critic's trimming versus no-body-edit tension is present in skills/openkb-html-critic/SKILL.md; it warrants no inference of actual content preservation or alteration. openkb/skill/workspace.py confirms explicit snapshot/restore, not score-selected replacement.

These checks support the epistemic report's scoped claim comparisons. Imported warrant remains unknown; synthesis instructions alone settle neither entailment nor non-entailment. Structural admission, advisory criticism and retention do not establish evidence-consuming semantic acceptance. Learning, reflection, retained method iteration and exercised self-improvement remain independently unestablished rather than a bundled denial of the supported retention and transformation mechanisms.

The previous runtime blocker is repaired. I reread both complete exploration-save implementations in SRC-1, openkb/cli.py, and REST delegation in openkb/api_helpers.py. Neither save implementation updates the catalog; the helper's shared-CLI docstring does not match the duplicated CLI branch. The current Runtime account explicitly withholds catalog-mediated rediscovery while preserving saving and explicit later reads. RT-RTE-wiki-query, MEM-OBJ-explorations and MEM-OBJ-index now agree. Memory's first Integration issue retains an older correction request, but reconciliation accurately distinguishes that history from the current finding; it is not a live contradiction.

The previous artifact-consumer limit is also resolved by the current wording. SRC-1, openkb/agent/chat.py dispatches CLI /critique to a separate runner, whose tool in openkb/agent/skill_runner.py can read output files. The ordinary chat builder does not receive that grant. RT-RTE-deck-produce now names this distinction and expressly withholds shared-history and foreground-output-read inferences. Memory's session annotation and workflow's critic handoff agree. The reconciliation correctly retires both former conflicts. No remaining disagreement requires an unresolved-conflict disposition.

Selected omission questions came from the frozen tree, alternate shipped paths and producer/consumer dependencies: whether whole-file reads defeat a hard narrow-range claim; alternate writers undermine universal admission controls; saved answers actually acquire catalog selection; CLI commands add artifact readers absent from foreground chat; or evaluator results become live method changes. Independent tracing gives each a supported disposition above. A search of shipped openkb/ callers found write_wiki_file only at its definition; its broad capability and stale comment do not establish a grant to chat. Graph enumeration in SRC-1, openkb/visualize.py and openkb/schema.py, independently supports MEM-OBJ-graph's narrower node inventory rather than a complete knowledge inventory.

Further optional omission expansion stopped because no identified consequential challenge remains without a supported disposition. The reports already withhold exhaustive route coverage, output quality, host compliance, provider internals and observed activation. Uninspected supporting helpers and sample artifacts cannot establish absence or efficacy; inspecting every one is unnecessary to retain the supported compilation/retention/retrieval/diagnostic account. No additional publication limit is needed merely to repeat uncertainty already scoped in the records. This verdict is not an exhaustive security audit or a judgment of deployed reliability.

Blockers

none

Limits

none