Funes memory-profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes, their findings and bases, inventory assessments, natural units and explanatory notes against the handed records. The profile's comparison rationale correctly separates accumulated library memory from unchanged shipped instructions, external model internals, transient helper state and current CI results. Setup-created local guidance remains included. No frozen-source read or new evidence was needed. The supplied profile answers file is empty; no predecessor objection was treated as an established defect.

The reconciliation's raw-original and output supersessions are respected through MEM-OBJ-raw-originals and MEM-OBJ-outputs. Its unresolved caption-metadata and audit-result part distinctions do not establish a uniform retained object. The profile avoids that inference: retained editions use MEM-OBJ-text-editions, retained editorial reports use MEM-OBJ-health-reports, and fixed-rule consumption uses EPI-RTE-mechanical-checks. These conflicts do not invalidate the emitted substrate or form values within the declared retained-library boundary.

  • Storage substrate: Files are supported at claimed strength for the prescribed library and wired strength for helper file writes. Optional repository history is an afforded substrate, not a claim that every ingest is committed. The inventory includes binary originals, reports, changelog and new local guidance. Its known assessment does not require classifying excluded provider storage. See RT-OBJ-library-tree, RT-RTE-library-setup, RT-RTE-pdf-sidecar and RT-RTE-caption-fetch.
  • Representational form: Natural-language interpretation and fixed-rule symbolic consumption are supported separately. Numerical timestamps do not establish parametric memory. Opaque binaries and unspecified output formats remain unresolved, so the partial assessment does not imply complete payload classification. The helper unit groups forms, but its finding notes distinguish metadata from readable words. See MEM-OBJ-text-editions, MEM-OBJ-outputs and EPI-RTE-mechanical-checks.
  • Lineage: Imported originals, executable extraction/serialization, requested source compilation and agent-authored organization have their stated warrants. Known coverage concerns entry and derivation mechanisms, not unknown upstream authorship or factual warrant. The notes do not turn generic chat delivery into trace extraction. The helper unit combines derivation paths, but its imported finding explicitly names saved captions; it does not attribute caption acquisition to PDF extraction. See MEM-OBJ-raw-originals, MEM-OBJ-text-editions, MEM-OBJ-source-notes and MEM-OBJ-changelog.
  • Behavioral authority: Knowledge at compilation/answer consumers, routing through navigation/status, and instruction through new local guidance are supported at claimed strength. Current audit results do not establish retained enforcement or validation criteria. The unresolved old-log, recurrent-report and non-prose-output consumers justify partial coverage, rather than a complete negative for other forces. See MEM-BAP-wiki-evidence, MEM-OBJ-wiki-index, MEM-OBJ-source-registry, RT-BAP-librarian-instructions and MEM-OBJ-health-reports.
  • Write agency: Human content supply, cross-library approval and setup choices support local manual findings. Routine model admissions and helper admissions support automatic findings at their separate evidence layers. The setup note distinguishes confirmed conventions from generated file admission. Offered output filing and proposed editorial changes retain uncertainty; neither workflow initiation nor an offer is treated as a universal human gate. See RT-RTE-ingest-compile, RT-RTE-library-setup, RT-RTE-health-audit and MEM-OBJ-outputs.
  • Curation operations: Requested summaries support consolidation; merging rather than duplication supports deduplication; article correction supports evolution. Their claimed bases do not borrow implementation strength from the linters. Indeterminate source/output claim relations do not establish synthesis, and filing alone does not establish promotion. The partial inventory preserves those distinctions. See MEM-OBJ-source-notes, MEM-OBJ-concepts, EPI-OBJ-wiki and RT-RTE-health-audit.
  • Read-back direction: Question-driven and requested editorial reads support pull at claimed strength. Agent selection inside those requests is not an additional unsolicited supply operation. Future local-guidance loading and unspecified report/log/output follow-up remain unresolved, preventing a completely pull-only boundary. See RT-RTE-wiki-answer, RT-RTE-library-setup, RT-BAP-librarian-instructions and MEM-OBJ-changelog.
  • Read-back signal: Inapplicability is local to identified pull operations. No actual push selector is recorded for the unresolved included alternatives, so the axis appropriately emits no positive signal and remains not-determinable. Relative paths and agent relevance judgment within pull do not independently establish identifier or inferred-judgment push findings. See RT-RTE-wiki-answer, MEM-OBJ-wiki-index and RT-BAP-librarian-instructions.
  • Trace learning: Automatic source-fed writing and later knowledge use do not alone establish an original activity-trace input. Changelog/report retention does not establish the subsequent automatic update and later consumer. The not-determinable assessment avoids both an invented positive chain and an unsupported system-wide no. See MEM-OBJ-raw-originals, MEM-OBJ-changelog, MEM-OBJ-health-reports and RT-RTE-ingest-compile.
  • Trace source: No qualifying trace-learning chain in the accepted records establishes an original source category. The profile does not equate tool-generated text with tool-trace learning or caption timestamps with environmental events. Unresolved qualifying writes prevent axis-wide inapplicability. See MEM-OBJ-text-editions, MEM-OBJ-raw-originals and MEM-OBJ-health-reports.

No finding is upgraded to observed or causally supported. The empty scaffold and missing execution evidence limit operation and benefit, not the existence of the recorded requested or executable mechanisms. The uncertainty expressed by the partial and not-determinable assessments is faithful and is not itself an additional publication limit.

Blockers

none

Limits

none