sqlite-graph-memory profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes in the memory profile against the handed runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow findings. The review concerns comparison support and scoped coverage, not successful execution or benefit. No source read, new quotation or replacement record was needed.

The retained boundary is consistent with the records: source notes, derived index parts, freshness metadata, transcript rows, offsets and comparison history remain included. Static instructions, external weights, temporary delivery files and invocation-local working copies are not silently counted as accumulated memory. Excluding the benchmark's RAM copy does not exclude its underlying retained source notes or its distinct consumer. The records distinguish those roles in MEM-OBJ-benchmark-raw, MEM-OBJ-notes and RT-RTE-evaluation-paths.

  • Storage substrate and representational form: The findings distinguish Markdown/link structure, persisted numerical vectors, snippet/access metadata, freshness manifest, SQLite rows, optional comparison files and offsets. Graph and vector describe retained access structures; neither implies a SQL knowledge graph. Natural-language text, localized control fields and distributed numerical representations have supported consumption paths. Grouped units retain these distinct findings rather than treating pickle, JSON or SQLite encoding as representational form. The scoped known assessments are supported by MEM-OBJ-notes, MEM-OBJ-brain-e5, MEM-OBJ-brain-meta, MEM-OBJ-brain-manifest, MEM-OBJ-turns, MEM-OBJ-turnstate-offset, MEM-OBJ-ab-recall and EPI-OBJ-evaluation-records.
  • Lineage and write agency: Import and subsequent compilation are separate from initial authorship. Automatic index, hook and comparison writes do not become manual because an operator starts or installs them. The unresolved source-note and reference-admission mechanisms remain explicit; injected-encoder provenance is not inferred from the default encoder. Partial coverage preserves the supported findings without resolving these alternatives by assertion. See RT-RTE-index-admission, RT-RTE-turnstate-capture, MEM-OBJ-notes, MEM-OBJ-brain-e5 and EPI-OBJ-evaluation-records.
  • Behavioral authority: Advisory snippet delivery, ranking inputs, maintenance routing, operator history, afforded comparison inspection and benchmark-local validation/enforcement have distinct consumers and effects. Wired delivery does not claim observed compliance. Retained criteria at the reporting gate are not generalized into factual validation or repository-wide merge enforcement. Static temporal prescriptions do not confer instruction authority on arbitrary retrieved prose. See RT-BAP-context-delivery, RT-RTE-recall-options, MEM-OBJ-brain-manifest, MEM-OBJ-turnstate-offset, EPI-RTE-bench-score and EPI-RTE-bench-gate.
  • Curation operations: Consolidation is supported by retained snippet reduction and transcript extraction; duplicate removal is local to captured lists. The evolve finding concerns replacement of changed retained index entries, not a claim that every rebuild curates knowledge. It does not assert semantic correction, synthesis or preserved invalidation history. External note maintenance remains unresolved, so the axis is partial. See RT-RTE-index-admission, MEM-OBJ-brain-meta, MEM-OBJ-turns and RT-RTE-turnstate-capture.
  • Read-back direction and signal: Requested recall, ledger display and comparison inspection are separated from automatic consumption of prior manifest and checkpoint state. Internal selection that fulfills a recall request is not relabelled push. The identifier findings concern actual path/session matching of retained control parts, not a catalog label or a semantic query on a pull route. The corresponding pull-only units have no push-signal finding. See RT-RTE-mcp-recall, RT-RTE-index-admission, MEM-OBJ-brain-manifest, RT-RTE-turnstate-capture and MEM-OBJ-turnstate-offset.
  • Trace learning and trace source: Trace-derived lineage does not alone establish a qualifying learning route. The ledger has a viewer, not an established later automatic behavior-shaping update consumer; the offset is routine window control. Note provenance and subsequent feedback adoption remain unresolved. The reports declare no bounded absence record licensing a local learning negative. Accordingly, no yes/no union or qualifying trace-source value is asserted. The not-determinable assessments preserve uncertainty rather than imply absent learning. See MEM-OBJ-turns, MEM-OBJ-turnstate-offset, MEM-OBJ-notes, MEM-OBJ-ab-recall, EPI-OBJ-evaluation-records and RT-RTE-evaluation-paths.

I applied the supplied reconciliation: the ledger citations use the canonical memory object rather than the superseded epistemic declaration; diagnostic checking contributes no additional retained report store or automatic repair operation. The broader note/snippet and recall-state containers remain overlapping accounts, not replacement identities.

I also checked the consequential qualifications: current links can accompany older snippets; temporal replacement access is not temporal truth enforcement; benchmark extraction differs from MCP snippet delivery; a nonempty scoped file is not a positive-hit or truth check. None is contradicted by the emitted comparison values. These qualifications remain supported by RT-CLM-temporal-scope, MEM-OBJ-benchmark-raw, EPI-RTE-extract-answer, RT-CLM-scoped-return and the workflow acceptance account.

The profile's uncertainty is faithfully scoped. I found no unsupported emitted value or evidence basis, materially misleading inventory claim, or unresolved disagreement requiring a publication blocker or an additional verification limit.

Blockers

none

Limits

none