Swamp profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes in the profile against the handed runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow findings. I assessed the scope, natural units, positive values, evidence bases and coverage separately. I used the supplied reconciliation's identity dispositions: the canonical issue-feedback route is MEM-RTE-plan-iteration, while the plan/feedback container, adversarial-review subset and specific clearance callback do not replace their differently scoped memory records. No frozen-source read, new record or quotation was needed.

  • Storage and form: MEM-OBJ-data-content, MEM-OBJ-method-report, RT-OBJ-workflow-run and EPI-OBJ-verification-summary support the local file-backed witnesses and the separation of interpreted prose from fixed-rule fields. The profile does not classify underlying opaque payloads from report displays, equate JSON with a database substrate, or attribute external model weights to Swamp. Unresolved backends and custom products keep the axes partial.
  • Lineage: Caller-authored issue content, captured command activity, execution-derived reports and expanded replay forms have distinct recorded derivation paths. MEM-OBJ-feedback-main and MEM-RTE-plan-iteration preserve uncertain human/model authorship and incomplete feedback enumeration. RT-RTE-extension-load supports local editing and imported capability paths without resolving every initial provenance path. The partial assessment does not authenticate those origins.
  • Behavioral authority: The profile separates prose as reference, the claimed instruction to follow an approved plan, and criticism at the instructed revision consumer. It does not upgrade those instructions to observed compliance or improved capacity. MEM-BAP-retained-checks and EPI-RTE-issue-clearance support validation and veto at selected preflight consumers; RT-RTE-workflow-run supports continuation constraints. RT-RTE-extension-load and RT-BAP-workflow-execution bound the executable/type-resolution authority to registered code and constrained execution, not universal host containment. EPI-RTE-attestation-ci supports CI admission force, preserving the difference between errors and warning-only freshness. One local inventory omission is retained below.
  • Write agency: MEM-RTE-report-retrieval, MEM-RTE-audit-timeline, RT-RTE-workflow-run and the evaluation/attestation records support automatic machine-generated recording. The claimed human approval policy in RT-RTE-issue-admission remains distinct from actual caller submissions. Generic caller identity does not resolve per-content human control; workflow initiation does not make subsequent report admission manual.
  • Curation: MEM-RTE-plan-iteration and MEM-RTE-lifecycle-checks support revision and bounded withdrawal of reliance. Report reduction supports consolidation; EPI-RTE-attestation-build supports a new aggregate gate proposition without implying ampliative conjecture. MEM-RTE-data-cleanup supports mechanical forgetting. The profile does not infer deduplication, promotion or exhaustive transformation coverage from names.
  • Read-back direction and signal: MEM-RTE-data-query, MEM-RTE-report-retrieval, MEM-RTE-audit-timeline and explicit continuation support requested pulls. Internal resource loads remain requests by their consumers, not additional unsolicited deliveries. Identifier-bearing pull requests do not establish identifier push. The signal axis retains uninspected alternatives rather than claiming a completely assessed pull-only system.
  • Trace learning and source: MEM-RTE-report-retrieval and EPI-RTE-report-summary establish automatic execution-feedback-to-durable-summary chains with later reference/context consumers. Under the profile type, these support local wired trace-learning positives and tool-trace inputs without a parameter update, novel knowledge, automatic push or demonstrated benefit. Raw command capture, unchanged checkpoints and nonpersisted activity displays are not automatically additional qualifying writes. Unresolved caller-origin and adoption alternatives remain unresolved rather than becoming a local or global negative.

The emitted findings remain bounded implementation or doctrine classifications. Neither the reports' cautions about beneficial learning nor their lack of execution evidence defeats an otherwise established wired summary route. Conversely, one wired witness does not resolve the opaque alternatives. The coarse grouping of some inventories limits route-by-route comparison but does not establish complete system coverage: the positive axes remain partial and the signal axis uninspected.

Blockers

none

Limits

  • The profile's partial behavioral-authority inventory does not separately classify the retained task brief at the launch consumer. RT-OBJ-task-brief, RT-RTE-agent-launch and RT-BAP-agent-instructions establish the named brief and its agent-guidance handoff, whereas the profile includes that object in storage and form but not as its own authority unit. Withhold complete per-object authority and launch-versus-issue-guidance comparisons. Existing positive authority findings remain supported, and the axis already expresses incomplete coverage; this omission does not warrant an absence claim or require withholding the bounded profile.