Dynamic Cheatsheet reconciliation

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

The four reports describe the same shipped caller–generator–curator–caller loop under the frozen boundary. This reconciliation uses their accepted findings and retained passages; it makes no additional source reads. No correction answers or refusal were supplied. The reports contain no cross-report disagreement requiring an unresolved-conflict paragraph. Their different levels of detail and scoped uncertainties do not establish conflicting findings.

Duplicate identities and retained parts

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-cheatsheet is superseded by MEM-OBJ-cheatsheet. Both identify the same live carried string returned as final_cheatsheet, interpreted by generator and curator and optionally serialized in caller JSONL. Both explicitly identify it as a semantic part of RT-OBJ-output-dict, not a replacement envelope. Their SRC-1 wrapper and prompt evidence agrees on natural-language strategy/claim content, symbolic delimiters and whole-string replacement. The epistemic inventory and ledger's candidate-content, admission and reliance findings continue to concern that same payload; supersession changes neither those findings nor their uncertainty. The epistemic record's assumptions/limitations passage supplements the memory account rather than defining a separate object. Both IDs remain declared.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-generator-output is superseded by MEM-OBJ-final-output. Both identify final_output/generator solution text accumulated into generator_outputs_so_far, including rendered local-execution feedback when present, and distinguish it from the sheet and its result envelope. Their retained SRC-1 run_benchmark.py passage identifies the same append operation; their wrapper findings agree that returned provider text is not complete hosted-event state. Epistemic assessments of candidate answers, curator inputs, retrieved examples and calculation evidence therefore concern the memory record's raw solution trace, not another operative object. No finding or evidence status is replaced by this identity connection.

The result envelope remains a valid container alongside its parts. MEM-OBJ-previous-answers is a different part: extracted answers labeled by cumulative round, optionally supplied to later rounds of the same invocation. It is neither the full solution trace nor curator-derived guidance. No supersession of RT-OBJ-output-dict is warranted, and no missing part requiring a split is identified.

Distinct mechanisms and convergent findings

EPI-RTE-curator-review is explicitly part of RT-RTE-cumulative-update. It isolates the requested semantic check from the larger generation/update route. The runtime's wired prompt construction and the epistemic overlay's implemented check request agree; neither establishes successful checking. The workflow's curator handoff account independently traces the same fresh context, same client and absence of a supplied reference target. This is containment and convergence, not duplicate route identity.

EPI-RTE-sheet-admission spans deterministic extraction in both cumulative/hybrid updates and retrieval-synthesis within RT-RTE-context-selection. It is not identical to either larger route. The three analyst accounts and workflow recovery account agree that an opening tag permits replacement without a correctness veto or mandatory closing tag. Distinct timing and fallbacks remain material: cumulative/hybrid uses the old sheet; synthesis uses selected raw pairs. No route supersession is warranted.

EPI-OBJ-target is an imported scoring input; EPI-OBJ-score-result is transient Boolean/counter state produced by RT-RTE-score-answer. Neither duplicates the result envelope or the scoring route. EPI-ABS-score-feedback identifies a missing score-to-memory feedback edge, not an absent scorer. Runtime, memory and workflow agree that scoring follows the memory handoff and ordinary false scores do not reject the sheet. The epistemic predicate and answer-extraction qualifications narrow the scorer's license without contradicting the runtime's account of its implemented dispatch. Evaluation failure before persistence remains distinct from truth-sensitive rejection.

The claims also retain distinct referents. RT-CLM-adaptive-memory concerns parameter-preserving reuse; EPI-CLM-verified-solutions isolates the curator's normative warrant requirement; EPI-CLM-performance-gains isolates reported benefit. Shared source context does not make these claims identical. All reports separate implemented input wiring from reliable compliance, observed activation and causal benefit. RT-BAP-reference-context supplies the common advisory downstream authority path; enforcement of text selection is not enforcement of semantic correctness.

Integration-issue dispositions and limits

The memory integration issues require no runtime correction. The omitted-content warning concerns loss from the live sheet, not destruction of every representation: earlier JSONL sheets may survive, while archived final outputs have an ordinary retrieval route. Runtime and workflow already preserve that distinction; no automatic semantic rollback or old-sheet merge is established.

MEM-RTE-history-controls and MEM-OBJ-messages add adapter reset/replacement affordances, distinct from benchmark context selection. Their unspecified external caller prevents a deployed retained-history reload conclusion, not the positive capability finding. MEM-OBJ-input-embeddings supplies numerical selector inputs rather than retained answer text or a model component counterpart. Its unresolved provenance and payload quality coexist with the runtime's wired cosine selection.

MEM-OBJ-container-id distinguishes the local identifier, opaque hosted payload and returned text. It complements, rather than duplicates, RT-RTE-provider-execution. Shared identifier reuse supports a requested channel, not observed hosted-state reuse or restoration through JSONL. Likewise RT-RTE-local-execution remains distinct from provider execution and post-generation scoring: the local permission flag is not a whole-system execution or isolation guarantee.

No other identity or supersession is established among the supplied declarations. The workflow declares no new records. Its delivery and recovery annotations converge with RT-RTE-benchmark-cycle: library return, in-memory handoff and durable checkpoint are different stages, and recovery is best effort. Available but uninspected result, dataset and vector payloads remain limitations, not access gaps or evidence of absent behavior. The epistemic report's independently unestablished learning, theory-criticism, reflection, autonomy and exercised self-improvement conclusions neither negate the implemented memory loop nor strengthen its statuses.