Meta-Harness profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

The handed memory profile supports publication against the accepted records. I checked all ten axes, their positive findings and evidence bases, unit boundaries, unresolved alternatives and inventory assessments. I also checked the author's correction answer against the current profile and the predecessor objection. No source files were read, new quotations retained or replacement records produced.

The reconciliation's example-list supersession resolves to MEM-OBJ-examples; the superseded epistemic object is not an independent witness. The valid summary container remains represented through MEM-OBJ-summary-results and MEM-OBJ-summary-rationale. The broader EPI-OBJ-val-results supplies numerical result-file coverage, not the rationale part's lineage or authority. The supplied reconciliation identifies no unresolved conflict. I checked the KIRA surviving-message qualification, partial classification logs, heterogeneous terminal failure handling and pilot historical-score/final-code distinction against the affected records rather than selecting a stronger aggregate status.

  • Storage substrate: File and in-memory findings follow the operative stores rather than their encodings. MEM-OBJ-memory, MEM-OBJ-classification-log, MEM-OBJ-completion-cache and MEM-OBJ-evaluation-history distinguish checkpoint transport, logs, response files and pilot tuple/file retention. Requested documents retain an afforded basis. The partial axis includes unresolved generated payloads and provider/host retention rather than extrapolating local file storage to them.
  • Representational form: The profile distinguishes demonstration and rationale text from fixed-rule keys, numerical/control fields, executable source and comparator inputs. MEM-OBJ-examples, MEM-OBJ-summary-rationale, MEM-OBJ-summary-results, EPI-OBJ-predictions and RT-BAP-candidate-execution support these consumption-path distinctions. Mixed units identify their operative parts in findings and notes; they do not classify opaque payloads from display summaries. External model weights are expressly excluded from this use-derived memory scope.
  • Lineage: Imported training associations, compiled numerical projections, authored hypotheses/code and trace-extracted outputs retain separate derivation warrants. MEM-RTE-classification-memory, the two summary-part records and MEM-OBJ-classification-log support those findings. Software copying does not upgrade authored rationale into a verified explanation. Unknown checkpoint initialization and inherited/provider provenance remain unresolved rather than inheriting a known branch's classification.
  • Behavioral authority: The profile names actual consumers and effects. Demonstrations and replay supply answer content; counters route resume; frontier fields rank/select candidates; pilot history controls score eligibility and historical maximum; the domain specification supplies implementation direction. MEM-RTE-completion-replay, MEM-OBJ-frontier-val, MEM-OBJ-summary-results, EPI-RTE-history-selection and RT-RTE-domain-onboarding support the respective findings. Experience at an update consumer and its output at a later inference remain distinguishable within the notes and finding-specific citations. Learning authority is not presented as measured improvement; arbitrary generated code effects remain partial.
  • Write agency: Automatic findings concern software/model admission mechanisms, not merely file I/O or authorship. MEM-RTE-classification-memory, MEM-OBJ-memory, the summary-part records and RT-RTE-pilot-search support admission after workflow launch without per-content human approval. The manual finding is scoped to explicit consequential operator decisions in RT-RTE-domain-onboarding, not all text the assistant might add. Generic direct checkpoint replacement and opaque initialization remain unresolved.
  • Curation operations: Result-history reduction, frontier replacement/selection and best-epoch replacement support consolidation, evolution and promotion under their named transformations. MEM-OBJ-summary-results, MEM-OBJ-frontier-val, MEM-OBJ-memory and EPI-RTE-frontier-selection supply the warrants. The visible fallback in RT-RTE-kira-execution, with its memory annotation, supports reduced continuation context without asserting total history loss or faithful inherited summarization. The reset correction is supported: the current unit has no invalidate finding, and its note and rationale preserve the missing history-retention relation. The search annotations establish selective deletion and residual artifacts, not history of the particular withdrawn contents. Removing that unsupported positive leaves the independent curation findings intact. Opaque transformations and requested reports remain unresolved, not classified from their names.
  • Read-back direction: MEM-RTE-classification-memory, MEM-RTE-completion-replay, MEM-OBJ-summary-results and EPI-RTE-history-selection support requested state/history reads. Automatic demonstration selection and KIRA continuation delivery support push at their respective operations. Instructed proposer/document reads retain an afforded basis. The profile does not count a requested return as a separate push or ordinary pilot tool-message accumulation as a new memory read-back mechanism.
  • Read-back signal: The few-shot unit names the prediction trigger, input-derived seed, available examples and budgets; these establish coarse selection, not identity matching against stored questions. The fallback unit names the context-pressure failure trigger and bounded screen suffix. MEM-RTE-classification-memory and RT-RTE-kira-execution support these findings. Pull-request fulfillment is locally inapplicable, while inherited/generated/provider push selectors remain unresolved. A cache digest or requested path is not promoted to identifier-based push.
  • Trace learning: RT-RTE-kira-execution supports automatic retained continuation delivered to later inference without requiring measured benefit. Reference experience-to-code/report use remains afforded through RT-RTE-classification-search, RT-RTE-terminal-search and MEM-OBJ-reports. Pilot feedback reaches an editor of persistent source in RT-RTE-pilot-search; the wired finding does not claim observed evidence-responsive editing. The unresolved supervised/generated/provider unit is cautious but does not emit an unsupported negative or erase the supported positive routes.
  • Trace source: Session conversation and terminal/tool observations support the KIRA source findings; requested linked terminal trajectories and classification execution logs support the afforded reference findings; evaluation-tool results support the pilot tool-trace finding. The relevant search routes, MEM-OBJ-classification-log and MEM-OBJ-evaluation-history retain those origins. Serialization does not create an event-stream source. Opaque input mixtures remain unresolved rather than inapplicable because another route is known.

All ten axis assessments remain partial. Several units group mechanisms sharing a controlled finding and coverage, but their notes and finding-specific citations preserve the consequential parts, consumers and bases. They do not assert a complete system inventory. The unresolved generated-state, initialization, inherited selection and provider alternatives remain visible on the relevant branches. Missing observed-run or causal evidence does not invalidate architectural findings, and none is upgraded to observed operation or causal benefit. The predecessor's reset objection is repaired; its former presence supplies no independent reason to block the corrected profile. No additional material defect or publication limit remains. The uncertainty already expressed in the profile is faithful bounded uncertainty, not an assertion of absence.

Blockers

none

Limits

none