WikiSkill synthesis verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

The handed synthesis supports publication as a bounded implementation account. I checked every substantive passage, the retrieval description, the independent property assessments and each limitation against the supplied records, reconciliation and verification judgments. No material unsupported conclusion or omitted carried limit remains. No source reads, new evidence, corrected text or new records were added.

The evidence basis agrees with the boundary and Source register: this is the independent implementation at the frozen commit, not the original paper implementation or an observed deployment. Whole-system functional scope is explicitly distinguished from complete inspection. The opening description of experience-to-instruction adaptation identifies implemented delivery rather than successful learning or semantic warrant.

The ordinary progression faithfully composes RT-RTE-product-round, RT-RTE-native-handoff and the workflow account. It preserves task completion before maintenance, committed maintenance before proposal, host ownership of child creation, host-reported freshness and the weaker direct-submission boundary. Scorer authorization, supplied scores and journal hashes are not promoted into evaluator validity, sandboxing or authenticated integrity. Research invocation is kept distinct from the host-neutral product controller.

The Wiki-to-candidate account uses the canonical MEM-OBJ-patterns, consistently with reconciliation's supersession of the duplicate epistemic object. It distinguishes product replayed mappings from MEM-OBJ-research-wiki. Existing-pattern source identifiers, replacement behavior and retention before skill evaluation remain explicit. Identifier membership is not treated as entailment. Intended model authorship and requested procedural content are not treated as authenticated authorship or validated semantics.

Context and provenance claims preserve the actual intervening projections. MEM-OBJ-research-evidence supports the selected cases, trace limits and optional fuller reads. MEM-OBJ-skill-impact supports the distinction between archived rationale and inline history. MEM-OBJ-paper-skills supports retained PURPOSE text without its inclusion in task injection. MEM-RTE-paper-adapters supports a callable injected-transport alternative, not default CLI activation. The public text does not infer comprehension, lossless context or foreground-chat compaction from these mechanisms.

The selection and recovery account preserves all material gate differences: strict numeric improvement, ordinary feedback preference, explicit-requirement ties with fulfilled checks and no worse cases or regressions, and separate research predicates. It carries the feedback initialization exception, selective retention of Wiki after candidate rejection, scoring retry reuse and the isolated study's single-round horizon. RT-RTE-feedback-gate, RT-RTE-research-evolve, RT-RTE-isolated-study and the memory annotations support these distinctions. RT-RTE-skill-install and RT-CLM-mcp-separation support byte deployment/restoration and tool-surface separation, not actual host consumption or host-wide privilege enforcement.

The assessment stays within the records' licenses. Exact-label equality, edit/read preconditions and snapshot consistency remain separate checks, not truth or causal certificates. The four theory-builder conditions retain their separate affordance, wiring and uninspected-operation qualifications. Learning leads with durable trace-fed update paths while withholding improved future capacity. Reflection and autonomy are not inferred from role names or persistence. The self-improvement passage names its boundary, horizon and independent objective, explicitly marks a dispositional pathway, and identifies unobserved evidence-responsive determination and subsequent content-dependent operation. It does not claim exercised or successful self-improvement from installation or selection alone. These distinctions follow the runtime routes and epistemic bounded conclusion.

The Limitations carries the report verifier's partial-controller inventory limit, including its consequences for universal checkpoint, provenance, recovery and acceptance comparisons. The epistemic coverage account independently preserves the bounded inventory rather than asserting absence. The supplied profile verification declares no additional limits; the synthesis nevertheless preserves unresolved payload form, caller control, session fallback classification and external-host consumption without emitting complete comparison values. Reconciliation carries no unresolved conflict. No previous synthesis-verification limit was supplied. The remaining uncertainties are faithfully scoped in the public account, not additional verification defects. Proposed evidence and system changes address the corresponding unresolved links without implying that such evidence already exists.

Blockers

none

Limits

none