FrameCode-VibeWork report verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

The supplied records support a bounded account of a governance and memory system with optional executable assistance, not an enclosing model runtime. The earlier read-back blockers are resolved. I judged the current reports afresh, treating correction answers and the previous verification as arguments rather than source evidence. The supplied structural report has no failures. No target code, tests, examples, models or services were executed.

The checkout HEAD equals the revision in the boundary, its Git status is clean, and its top-level tracked tree agrees with the coverage table. Independent reads below concern SRC-1 at that revision. Python supplies implementation evidence; policies, templates and skills supply doctrine/design. Neither supplies observed host compliance or causal benefit.

Records, evidence and consequential branches

I reviewed every declaration and annotation in the runtime records, memory records, epistemic records and workflow annotations, including source anchors, load-bearing passages, status strength, operative parts, consumers and scope. No evidenced-absence records are declared. The epistemic ledger's implemented checks remain separate from requested acceptance, retention, integration and behavior adaptation. The reports do not turn missing operation evidence into absent architectural capacity.

Direct reads of SRC-1 AGENTS.md, FCVW/PLANNING.md, FCVW/REGRESSION_GUARDS.md and FCVW/skills/orchestrator/SKILL.md support the ordinary change flow and selected multi-package workflow. Scope and delegation authority, collision checks, main-agent review, final regression evidence, bounded bypass and explicit deferral are prescribed controls. They establish neither a scheduler nor filesystem isolation. The RT-RTE-governed-change, RT-RTE-work-packages and workflow account preserve the distinction between accepted delivery and a worker's success assertion or a plan-directory move. R5 approval and approved irreversibility remain local requirements, not universal per-content approval.

I traced the complete SRC-1 tools/mcp_server_fcvw.py and tools/hook_fcvw.py bodies, plus tools/plan_queue_fcvw.py. The runtime's two corrections hold across the changed fields and dependent account:

• RT-RTE-mcp-checks now distinguishes retained section bodies, outline-only requests, active-plan references, queue identities/derived metadata/recommendation and digest output. Section assembly actually returns selected text; the queue actually derives its result from persisted plans and suppresses recommendations on error findings. Neither requires the reading handler to author memory. These findings agree with the memory MCP annotation.
• RT-RTE-hook-lifecycle now identifies automatic plan-identity read-back: sorted in-progress names and at most five sorted pending names reach additionalContext. This is not handoff-body loading or evidence of host reliance. The memory hook annotation agrees.

The same source tracing supports the runtime's restricted guarantees. Hook activation requires the contract/event and environment conditions; recognized-tool extraction, skipped paths, active/closing-plan allowance, shell non-interception, recursive stop and timeout/error exits defeat any universal edit or completion barrier. MCP directly checks resolved file arguments and caps selected content, but returns route references rather than mandatory bodies. Its validator subprocess uses fail-on never and JSON findings. SRC-1 tools/validate_fcvw.py contains read-only changed-Markdown Git queries; the runtime correctly rejects an unqualified no-Git reading of the MCP opening description. None of this confines arbitrary host tools.

Direct reads of SRC-1 tools/build_context_index.py, tools/retrieve_context.py, tools/context_routing_fcvw.py and tools/context_selection_fcvw.py support RT-RTE-context-delivery, RT-CLM-context-controls, MEM-RTE-index-build and the memory delivery annotation. Explicit authority/scope metadata precedes defaults in the shipped Markdown builder, making that countercase reachable rather than merely type-permitted. The independent validator can flag incompatible authority; it is not a mandatory pre-index admission step. Retrieval filters its graph candidate pool before expansion, penalizes rather than universally withdraws disputed lifecycle states, and does not rehash live sources. Budgeted CLI selection receives complete chunks and skips oversized candidates; ordinary excerpts are sliced. The budget covers the optional serialized array, not mandatory bodies or the host window. Empty structured selectors and caller-owned semantic events retain the routing limits already stated in the reports.

Direct inspection of SRC-1 FCVW/wiki/README.md, FCVW/skills/wiki-curator/SKILL.md, FCVW/AI.md and FCVW/governance/TEMPLATE_NOTE.md supports the MEM-OBJ-wiki, MEM-OBJ-session and MEM-RTE-session-handoff findings. Host curation, sourced promotion, bounded synthesis, disk verification on resume and archival retention are requested transformations, not an executable transcript compactor. Raw preservation, attributed feedback, reusable claims and current project authority remain distinct. Requested rationale and source links do not guarantee that every excerpt carries all original reasons.

The epistemic correction also holds. SRC-1 tools/validate_fcvw.py loads persisted wiki metadata and calls check_evidence; SRC-1 tools/knowledge_graph_fcvw.py loads metadata and passes source fields into tools/knowledge_sources_fcvw.py. The corrected Later read-back fields in EPI-RTE-evidence-check and EPI-RTE-source-review, and the dependent bounded conclusion, now describe those later consumers without conflating them with body delivery, report retention or semantic acceptance. Optional method guarding, URL non-fetching, local reference existence, role/authority checks, baseline/scoping and fail-on branches support the narrower consistency license. Digest mismatch, direct explicit dependency traversal and due dates produce review findings rather than automatic truth revision. This agrees with MEM-RTE-source-review.

Direct reads of SRC-1 FCVW/skills/QA/SKILL.md, FCVW/skills/QA/PRODUCT_WIKI.md and the complete tools/qa_wiki_fcvw.py support the specialized MEM-RTE-product-review, EPI-RTE-live-qa, EPI-RTE-qa-check and EPI-RTE-divergence-decision. Hashes bind selected parsed contracts, not unencoded behavior. Failed cases enter the decision set even without a divergence row. Clearing a decision cannot change a failed execution result; unknown/provisional cases cannot pass. The no-run blocked-inventory branch establishes a checkpoint, not application execution. Declared evidence and response references remain unauthenticated. The per-divergence user requirement therefore does not contradict general curation's lack of universal per-note human approval.

SRC-1 tools/benchmark_retrieval_fcvw.py and tools/check_fcvw.py support EPI-RTE-retrieval-benchmark and RT-RTE-local-checks: authored/caller labels, optional-selection comparison, subprocess status consumption and byte snapshots are bounded evaluators, not model-run or component-level causal evidence. SRC-1 tools/trace_fcvw.py confirms the MEM-OBJ-decision-trace contains symbolic tool-event evidence rather than claim bodies or attested model/consent events.

SRC-1 FCVW/skills/agent-factory/SKILL.md, FCVW/skills/self-improvement/SKILL.md, FCVW/OWNERSHIP.md and the complete tools/upgrade_fcvw.py support RT-RTE-asset-admission and RT-RTE-framework-upgrade. I checked missing-current-entry ordering as well as preserved-role branches, direct API versus CLI admission, conflict backups and optional pruning. The report already bounds preservation and non-atomic recovery accordingly. The separate theory-builder, reflection, autonomy, learning and self-improvement assessments do not assert performed criticism, improved future capacity or subsequent causal dependence merely from persistent method text.

Relations, supersessions and conflicts

All explicit Part of relations have supported containment: skill frontmatter within the document container, source-review and wiki phases within asset admission, and retrieval benchmarking within local checks. Separate entry points do not erase participation in a container. The reconciliation correctly preserves valid broader routes instead of substituting one narrower phase.

The four object supersessions identify the same wiki prose, wiki metadata, product contracts and QA-run artifacts across lenses. Their different analytical fields do not establish different referents or stronger warrant. Index production versus query delivery, source-condition calculation versus host revision, and application QA versus framework verification remain distinct routes. Policy instruction force remains distinct from evidence/continuity force.

The reconciliation correctly disposes of memory's stale integration-issue descriptions against the current runtime fields. Those descriptions are not a surviving substantive disagreement: memory's annotations and the corrected runtime now agree. Repeating the earlier conflict would misrepresent these inputs. The corrected epistemic metadata-consumption fields likewise need no unresolved-conflict marker. No missing conflict evidence or remaining contradictory central finding was identified. The stale issue wording is locally superseded by the explicit reconciliation disposition and does not change an emitted mechanism or comparison conclusion.

Consequential omission search and stopping decision

Selected questions were whether alternate shipped consumers defeat context guarantees, whether non-writing adapters consume retained state, whether product QA supplies stronger admission than generic promotion, and whether specialist learning or local tooling adds an omitted automatic update mechanism. Search basis was the frozen tracked tools/skills tree, producer/consumer imports and call sites, not just submitted anchors.

The CLI, benchmark, MCP, hook, graph/source checks and local driver were traced as shipped paths, not dismissed as external callers. Additional source searches found specialist profiles routing durable learning into sourced wiki pages, consistent with the existing host-curation account. SRC-1 FCVW/skills/agent-aegis/SKILL.md supplies doctrine/design:

• For durable codebase-specific security learning, update a canonical page or create a sourced fcvw/wiki@1 page under wiki/ (type: agent notes) with a collision-resistant ID; do not rely on a shared fixed journal filename. --- FCVW/skills/agent-aegis/SKILL.md

SRC-1 tools/fcvw_cache.py is a process-local text/frontmatter cache, not a separate semantic writer. SRC-1 tools/release_layout_fcvw.py confirms source-root tools map into installed FCVW tools; their location does not make these consumers external. These inspections require no boundary change.

Further optional expansion stopped because the selected challenges have supported dispositions and no identified material contradiction remains. Full navigation/dependency internals, historical claim instances, deployed provider/host behavior and actual application execution remain unassessed as the reports already state. Their omission permits no exhaustive negative, complete enforcement inventory, observed acceptance or efficacy comparison. Those faithfully scoped uncertainties do not invalidate the supported procedures and wired checks, and are not additional publication findings.

Blockers

none

Limits

none