Agent S profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

The handed memory profile is supported within its declared partial inventory. I checked all ten axes against their natural units, the accepted records and annotations, and the reconciliation's two object supersessions. The profile uses the canonical caption and judgment objects. It does not collapse S1/S2 experience, S3 coding returns and offline comparison into one runtime or transfer the alternative save API's afforded status to the wired CLI path. No refusal or substantive correction answers were supplied.

  • Storage and form: MEM-OBJ-embeddings supports filesystem storage and dense parametric representation, not a vector-service substrate or model-weight update. The profile separates these vectors from prose values and symbolic lookup keys. MEM-OBJ-notes, MEM-OBJ-code-result and MEM-OBJ-traj support the RAM/file distinction and the split between model-interpreted content and mechanically handled fields. Grouped local substrate units share the same classification and coverage; they do not conceal an incompatible substrate.
  • Lineage and admission: Trace-derived summaries, composed queries, external imports and compiled vectors have separate derivation paths. MEM-RTE-query-cache supports the split between model composition and external search import. RT-RTE-kb-bootstrap supports software archive admission, not original entry authorship or human review. MEM-RTE-knowledge-save supports automatic summary admission as an afforded mechanism despite its unresolved caller. Human workflow initiation is not treated as per-content approval.
  • Authority: The profile distinguishes advice at manager/worker consumers, ranking at similarity selection, learning at summary-production consumers, and mechanical routing or resume exclusion. These are supported by MEM-RTE-experience-retrieval, MEM-OBJ-code-result and MEM-OBJ-judge-results. Optional experience in a system prompt is not promoted to standing instruction. Caption evidence and relative-priority influence at the comparative consumer are supported by RT-RTE-rollout-selection; neither establishes accepted caption truth.
  • Curation: The historical and coding summarizers support consolidation at their respective wired or afforded bases. The partial caption unit preserves uncertainty about added claims. This does not conflict with the epistemic report's indeterminate proposition-level relations: an implemented reduction mechanism does not establish faithful output or synthesis. MEM-OBJ-narrative-memory, MEM-OBJ-episodic-memory, MEM-OBJ-code-result and MEM-OBJ-fact-captions preserve that distinction. Key preservation and cache filling are not misclassified as deduplication or revision.
  • Read-back: Requested experience/cache/file returns remain pull. Automatic notes and pending coding-return insertion remain push, with coarse availability selection. MEM-RTE-notes-delivery, MEM-RTE-experience-retrieval and RT-BAP-code-return support the operation boundaries. Embedding ranking on a requested return does not become a push signal; displayed task identity does not become identifier targeting.
  • Trace learning and sources: Historical persisted summaries, retained coding continuation summaries and offline captions have automatic trace-fed writes and named later consumers. The positive values do not claim exercised improvement. Recorded coding requests support tool-traces despite omitted controller outputs; linked screenshot/action evidence supports trajectories and tool-traces for captions. The generic alternative save API retains unresolved original input content rather than deriving a source value from its variable names. These distinctions follow RT-RTE-historical-experience, MEM-RTE-s1-experience, MEM-OBJ-code-result, MEM-RTE-knowledge-save and MEM-OBJ-fact-captions.

All axes remain partial. Initial provenance, unseen bundle alternatives, generic note/cache trace origins and provider-side state are not upgraded by local positive witnesses. The provider uncertainty follows RT-CMP-lmm-agent, RT-CMP-grounding-model and RT-CMP-embedding-engine. The profile therefore supports existence comparisons at the stated bases, not complete-value statistics, universal negatives, observed use, or causal benefit. These are faithfully expressed uncertainties, not additional unresolved verification findings.

Source-read log: none. Verification used only the supplied members and governing contracts; it adds no record, quotation or source evidence.

Blockers

none

Limits

none