Signet reconciliation

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

Boundary and evidence alignment

The reports share the frozen boundary and its Source register. The boundary includes the whole shipped system but explicitly distinguishes inclusion from inspection depth. The analysts retain selected traces and unresolved included operations; that is not a disagreement about which system is included. No report supplies observed execution or causal comparison. Runtime and specialist route declarations retain separate wired implementation and uninspected operation findings; the epistemic ledger's implemented architectural status does not upgrade operation status. This reconciliation uses the supplied members only; no additional source reads were made.

Containment and duplicate dispositions

No duplicate supersession is asserted. The following overlapping referents remain containers, parts or distinct operations rather than interchangeable declarations.

Other cross-report comparisons also retain distinct identities. MEM-CMP-embedding-provider produces retrieval vectors rather than the decisions of RT-CMP-inference-router; reuse of the inference router by aggregate synthesis is not a new model identity. MEM-BAP-feedback-selection consumes symbolic weights in code, unlike the advisory model-input consumer of RT-BAP-host-context or the mutation handlers of RT-BAP-maintenance-tools. EPI-CLM-source-connections, EPI-CLM-benchmark-accuracy and RT-CLM-tool-boundary concern different claimed operations. None is superseded by another.

Independent convergence and integration dispositions

Semantic-write ownership. The memory integration issues qualify the daemon slogan quoted in the boundary, not runtime's already qualified finding. Both MEM-RTE-aggregate-recall and the epistemic aggregate synthesis/retention records independently cite SRC-1 aggregate-recall implementation for model-assisted semantic writes outside Dreaming. RT-RTE-direct-remember already retains caller admission outside the maintenance model. There is no inter-report conflict here: the source-native slogan cannot be used as a whole-system invariant, and neither specialist withdraws runtime's bounded account.

Provenance and delivery; correction of the refused reconciliation. The refusal identified an unconditional support requirement in the earlier memory finding versus the NOOP exception retained by EPI-RTE-head-publication and WF-RTE-head-finalization. The supplied corrected MEM-OBJ-memory-head now explicitly retains both early returns: unchanged current body and an already empty head can return NOOP before commitEntries checks submitted support. Its integration issues acknowledge and correct the former unconditional finding. The record's retained SRC-1 platform/daemon/src/memory-head-owner.ts NOOP and MISSING_PROVENANCE passages distinguish these branches. The earlier discrepancy therefore does not remain a conflict between these pinned members; compatibility rests on that correction, not on selecting the stronger requirement. Successful finalization alone cannot establish fresh validation of every submitted support item. Requests reaching commitEntries validate entries and supports; committedEntries separately revalidates carried support for read-back and clearing guards.

RT-RTE-dreaming-pass and EPI-RTE-head-support retain exact-source correspondence as provenance checking rather than an interpretation-truth oracle. Runtime also retains structural/hygiene alternatives, so no universal episodic-quote requirement follows. Workflow distinguishes staging from database acceptance; epistemic publication distinguishes operational acceptance from truth acceptance. Database completion, pending/file publication and conditional host delivery remain distinct; the memory and workflow authored-file/freshness findings qualify downstream use without contradicting lifecycle wiring.

Compression budgets. MEM-RTE-history-compaction gives shortest-attempt and missing-parent limits on nominal line/view targets. Runtime explicitly leaves detailed summarizer selection uninspected; its fresh-frame account does not promise those hard ceilings. The memory integration issue therefore restricts future budget inferences without requiring a runtime correction.

Selection versus use. MEM-RTE-explicit-recall and RT-RTE-pi-lifecycle describe requested lookup versus automatically selected startup context, not identical delivery routes. The epistemic aggregate-delivery record adds that failed saveability can still permit immediate advisory use; the memory aggregate container likewise distinguishes saved from unsaved results. MEM-RTE-path-feedback and its selector authority establish a different durable update, not provider-weight training or demonstrated retrieval improvement. No report turns delivery, retention or changed selector state into observed benefit.

Evaluation and unresolved coverage. The memory checkpoint and epistemic benchmark records converge on a separate lab evaluator and resume consumer, not a Dreaming admission oracle. The reported accuracy claim remains reported rather than a verified run. Uninspected optimization scripts, provider/source paths, recovery, identity approval and other adapters remain local coverage limits, not established absences or inter-report disagreements. Workflow's user-review-queue passage is explicitly prompt doctrine, not a contrary claim that all writes receive human approval.

Conflict disposition

No unresolved inter-report conflict is identified in these pinned members. The supplied reconciliation refusal's head-provenance blocker is addressed above against the corrected memory member: the unconditional requirement is no longer its finding, and NOOP success does not imply fresh support validation. No separate analyst correction-answer files or declined objections were supplied. The memory integration issues preserve the correction, implementation additions and uncertainty limits; they do not establish a remaining defective peer finding. No required split is identified that makes a supplied combined record's finding wrong or requires an undeclared replacement part. Uninspected included operations remain limitations of the account, not invented record identities or system-complete negative conclusions.