Sig epistemic report

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-epistemic-report.md

Source-and-claim boundary

The question is whether Sig's declared accumulation of work context includes checks and acceptance of truth-apt claims, rather than retention and permission to share. Scope, exclusions and frozen evidence identity are see boundary; source identity and evidence layers are see Source register. This is a documentation-grounded partial application loop, not an inspected implementation. No target execution was performed.

Direct inspection here covered the complete README, beta release notes, analytics document and all three issue forms in SRC-1, plus the tracked-tree inventory at the reviewed commit. The runtime findings are provisional but no defective supplied fact or needed supersession was found. The combined capture/share record remains a valid container; the records below separate its materially different parts.

Entry point or operation Source path in SRC-1 Coverage and records Limit and conclusion prevented
Desktop launch, capture and voice input RELEASE_NOTES_v0.1.0-beta.md, README.md Direct reads; RT-RTE-capture-share, EPI-RTE-private-synthesis Launch assets and voice implementation unavailable; no call graph or transcription fidelity conclusion
Private synthesis, factual/personal separation README.md Direct read; EPI-CLM-factual-layer, EPI-RTE-private-synthesis No input/output instance, prompt or evaluator; cannot individuate produced propositions or classify their entailment
Organizational draft and send gate README.md, RELEASE_NOTES_v0.1.0-beta.md Direct reads; EPI-RTE-org-draft, EPI-RTE-share-approval No review trace or enforcement code; permission is not established truth acceptance
Local storage, deletion and team sync README.md, RELEASE_NOTES_v0.1.0-beta.md Direct reads; EPI-RTE-note-retention, EPI-RTE-context-use, EPI-RTE-local-deletion No provenance schema, conflict handling, correction or remote retraction mechanism
Provider messages, replies and retained-context use README.md, ANALYTICS.md Direct reads; RT-RTE-provider-message, RT-CMP-ai-provider, EPI-RTE-context-use No payload, response specimen or provider implementation; truth-apt response content and checking not determinable
Shared skills README.md Direct read; RT-OBJ-skills, RT-RTE-skill-sync No skill bodies, loader or recipient review; truth-apt portions and behavior-changing force unresolved
Slack and optional connections README.md, ANALYTICS.md Direct reads; optional connections and Slack sync counts named No exposed operation definitions or content path; acquisition, maintenance and evaluation through Slack unassessed
Analytics, errors, feedback and prioritization ANALYTICS.md Direct read; RT-RTE-analytics-egress, RT-CLM-telemetry-filter Counts and sanitation are not correctness checks; no consumer admitting a product revision shown
Public bug/feature intake .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feedback.yml, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml Direct reads; RT-RTE-product-feedback Forms solicit reports and a privacy attestation; no repair, truth adjudication or release consumer shown
CLI dispatch, hooks, registered tools, cleanup and rejection operations Complete tracked-tree inventory No executable source, tool definitions or shipped prompts in the frozen artifact; supplied boundary corroborates inventory Does not establish absence in the app; prevents system-complete negative about alternate evaluators or bypasses
License and screenshots LICENSE, screenshots/03-chat.png, screenshots/icon.png License role supplied by boundary; images remain excluded from visual inspection No legal or UI-layout inference; these do not close the application-loop gap

The principal warrant-related claims are see EPI-CLM-factual-layer and EPI-CLM-context-payoff. Publication/privacy claims are see RT-CLM-private-sharing, RT-CLM-provider-direct and RT-CLM-telemetry-filter. None expressly promises a correctness test for meeting claims. Unavailable implementation prevents determining whether an undisclosed evaluator exists. Missing run evidence separately prevents establishing activation; missing comparisons prevent establishing benefit or attributing it to accumulated context.

Epistemic-object inventory

Each evidence cell identifies a declaring record rather than duplicating its fields. Candidate content describes potential truth conditions, not observed propositions.

Object ID Candidate truth-apt content or none Claimed role Evidence source ID and local anchor Gap/limit
EPI-OBJ-capture User reports about what happened or was agreed in a meeting see record SRC-1, README.md No actual report or provenance instance
EPI-OBJ-factual-record Meeting events, decisions and commitments as represented in a structured note see record SRC-1, README.md Label factual does not establish truth or derivation
EPI-OBJ-personal-layer Interpretations may assert causes or meanings; some portions may instead express preference see record SRC-1, README.md No instance; truth-apt and non-truth-apt portions cannot be individuated
EPI-OBJ-org-version Selected organizational account of the meeting see record SRC-1, README.md Exact retained statements and omitted context unknown
RT-OBJ-skills Not determinable: no workflow body supplied see record SRC-1, README.md Workflow label alone cannot establish knowledge or policy content
RT-CMP-ai-provider Distributed-parametric model content not locally individuated; conversational response may contain claims see record SRC-1, README.md, ANALYTICS.md No exact version, weight access, payload or response specimen; no inference of parameter updates
RT-RTE-analytics-egress Event assertions about usage, errors and success; explicit user feedback see record SRC-1, ANALYTICS.md Success field's criterion unspecified; errors need not be semantic failures
RT-RTE-product-feedback Reporter assertions about expected versus actual behavior see record SRC-1, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml Submission affordance, not accepted diagnosis

Authority-route ledger

All architectural statuses below refer to documentary routes, not inspected app code. A declared reviewer is not silently promoted to a truth evaluator. Source warrant on imported narrative is unknown; restructuring, storage and permission do not strengthen it. Fields owned by a cited record are marked see.

Route ID Route function Architectural status Object/candidate ID Content/update relation Transition or check target Evaluator/condition and domain Activation and timing Possible or observed result Implemented force Epistemic authority and scope Operational authority: behavior permitted, blocked, or changed Behavioral-authority path: consumer, channel, force, horizon Evidence source ID and local anchor Claim IDs or none Mismatch marker or none Gap/limit
RT-RTE-capture-share content transformation doctrine only EPI-OBJ-capture truth-apt transformation: acquisition/import User meeting account enters capture User recollection; no independent check specified see record see record No inspected app force Imported account; source warrant unknown Declared start of local synthesis Sig capture channel; proposed input; current capture SRC-1, README.md none none Import does not produce or verify the meeting facts
EPI-RTE-private-synthesis content transformation doctrine only EPI-OBJ-factual-record, EPI-OBJ-personal-layer truth-apt transformation: indeterminate Narrative to separated private layers No truth evaluator specified see record see record No inspected app force Candidate organization only Declared local note creation Private note consumer; markdown; advisory context; later sessions claimed SRC-1, README.md EPI-CLM-factual-layer unknown semantic fidelity Reshaping, derivation and conjecture cannot be distinguished without contents and transformation evidence
EPI-RTE-org-draft content transformation doctrine only EPI-OBJ-org-version truth-apt transformation: indeterminate Private account to clean org-level draft No semantic evaluator specified see record see record No inspected app force Candidate for publication, not accepted knowledge Declared presentation to reviewer User; exact-text review UI; advisory proposal; this share SRC-1, README.md RT-CLM-private-sharing unknown omissions Removing personal material may change interpretation; no checked preservation evidence
EPI-RTE-share-approval disposition/acceptance doctrine only EPI-OBJ-org-version no content change Permission to send selected exact text Human chooses inclusion and approves; publication/privacy domain, not named truth criterion see record see record Enforcing gate claimed, not inspected No evidence-consuming truth acceptance established Declared approval permits team publication; withholding blocks this share Sig send boundary then team repository; permissive; this share and retained team context SRC-1, README.md RT-CLM-private-sharing scope distinction No separate correctness-check result, evidence or acceptance criterion disclosed
EPI-RTE-note-retention retention doctrine only EPI-OBJ-factual-record, EPI-OBJ-personal-layer, EPI-OBJ-org-version no content change Local persistence and approved team availability Local write policy opaque; team write follows publication approval see record see record No inspected app force Retention grants no new warrant Declared later availability Local files or git-backed team knowledge; availability, not compliance; across sessions SRC-1, README.md, RELEASE_NOTES_v0.1.0-beta.md EPI-CLM-context-payoff retention is not integration No accepted claim linked to evidence or changed organization after truth acceptance shown
EPI-RTE-context-use operational admission/selection/consumption doctrine only EPI-OBJ-factual-record, EPI-OBJ-personal-layer, EPI-OBJ-org-version no content change Retained work history reaches later AI context Selector, request boundary and evaluation opaque see record see record Context supply claimed, compliance unobserved Relevance and correctness not licensed by presence Claimed influence on later answers AI tools and teammate Sig; context channel; advisory content; later sessions SRC-1, README.md EPI-CLM-context-payoff delivery versus benefit Exact selected subset and post-selection content unknown
EPI-RTE-local-deletion lineage/freshness/recovery doctrine only Local retained layers no content change User removes local files User file deletion, not a stated truth rejection see record see record User ability claimed No documented withdrawal of a proposition's warrant Local removal only claimed Filesystem; destructive local removal; subsequent local availability SRC-1, README.md, RELEASE_NOTES_v0.1.0-beta.md none local versus global withdrawal Remote copies, cached context and correction propagation unresolved
RT-RTE-skill-sync operational admission/selection/consumption doctrine only RT-OBJ-skills no content change Shared workflow becomes available User shares; recipient activation unknown see record see record No inspected loader force Not determinable without skill bodies Reusable workflows advertised; no evidence-responsive policy update established see record; invocation force unresolved SRC-1, README.md none none Sync alone does not prove use, criticism or adaptation
RT-RTE-analytics-egress check/evidence production doctrine only Usage/error events and comments no content change Event/property eligibility and privacy sanitation Claimed allowlist/sanitizer; telemetry payload domain, not work-content truth see record see record Dropping disallowed fields claimed No correctness warrant; success metric undefined Allowed telemetry can leave; prioritization claimed App emitter to PostHog and developers; diagnostic/advisory; later prioritization SRC-1, ANALYTICS.md RT-CLM-telemetry-filter diagnostics versus validation Sanitization not inspected; no admitted repair consumer
RT-RTE-product-feedback check/evidence production implemented Reporter problem account truth-apt transformation: acquisition/import Required report fields and privacy attestation Form definitions impose required fields; human supplies assessment, not software adjudication see record see record Form affordance only; hosting unobserved Imported report with unknown warrant Intake supported, no implemented production revision GitHub issue form; advisory report to humans; later triage unspecified SRC-1, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feedback.yml none intake versus correction Required privacy checkbox does not inspect text or validate diagnosis

No distinct truth-check, truth-acceptance, accepted-claim lifecycle-integration or evidence-responsive behavior-adaptation route was established in these documents. This is not a system-complete negative: the app, tool surface, optional integrations and provider implementation are unavailable. The private and organizational transformations cannot be classified as non-ampliative merely because the product calls them synthesis. Nor does failure to establish entailment prove ampliative conjecture. No concrete deterministic text transformation can be deduced from implementation: sanitation is documented, not supplied as code.

System-claim versus route comparison

Claim ID Claimed operation or warrant Claim source ID/anchor and evidence layer Doctrine/design support Implemented route IDs Observed-run support Causal support and design limits Supported conclusion Mismatch/unknown
EPI-CLM-factual-layer see record SRC-1, README.md; doctrine/design and reported operation in beta notes see record none inspected none supplied No source-grounded factuality comparison Declared separation of facts and personal interpretation Actual separation and truth of factual layer unknown
EPI-CLM-context-payoff see record SRC-1, README.md; doctrine/design see record none inspected none supplied No baseline, intervention, task domain, metric or component contrast Retained context is intended to aid later AI work Dramatically sharper AI not demonstrated
RT-CLM-private-sharing see record SRC-1, README.md; doctrine/design see record none inspected none supplied No gate trace or bypass coverage Declared human publication permission Approval does not establish truth acceptance or universal egress control
RT-CLM-provider-direct see record SRC-1, README.md; doctrine/design see record none inspected none supplied No transport or payload evidence Independent provider-egress claim bounds local-only wording Does not warrant response correctness or provider privacy
RT-CLM-telemetry-filter see record SRC-1, ANALYTICS.md; doctrine/design see record none inspected none supplied No payload trace, sanitizer or backend evidence Claimed payload filtering; explicit comments are an exception Privacy filtering cannot be used as a work-knowledge evaluator

Bounded conclusion

Sig declares an acquisition-and-context route: a user's meeting account becomes private structured notes, a selected organizational account can be human-approved for team publication, and retained history is intended to reach later AI context. Sources, roles and limits are see EPI-RTE-private-synthesis, EPI-RTE-org-draft, EPI-RTE-share-approval, EPI-RTE-note-retention and EPI-RTE-context-use. Imported source warrant is unknown. No supplied artifact shows which statements survive synthesis, which are added, or whether a claimed fact is true.

The consequential named decision is permission to share selected text, not evidence-consuming acceptance against a truth criterion. Its intended use is team publication and its scope is the organizational version; the proposed consumer is Sig's send boundary, followed by team storage and later AI context. The declared gate is permissive for that share, not an observed correctness guarantee. Local retention can precede any sharing decision. Consequently retention and operational use do not establish accepted ampliative knowledge or post-acceptance lifecycle integration.

The accessible documents establish neither warranted entailed derivation nor a specific ampliative conjecture: no warranted premise set, concrete derived claim or checked interpretation is supplied. Response-generation semantics, skill bodies and distributed-parametric state remain opaque; no model update, accepted theory or criticism loop can be inferred. Learning benefit is unestablished independently of intended persistence. Reflection, autonomous theory building and self-improvement are not established by sync, telemetry or accumulated notes. These are separate evidence limits, not consequences of a single unfavorable status.

The counterexamples that bound stronger readings are material: explicit provider requests and telemetry comments qualify the broad local-only wording; user sharing approval checks publication permission rather than disclosed truth criteria; deleting a local folder does not document withdrawal from team or provider context. Diagnostics and public reports can supply evidence about operation, but no admitted repair or subsequent behavior causally depending on it is shown. The narrower operational design is coherent without a knowledge-production claim. Its advertised compounded AI benefit remains a claim, not an observed or causally supported result.

Shared records

Operative objects

EPI-OBJ-capture

Label: Capture

Part of: RT-RTE-capture-share

Distinct input part of the supplied route, not its retained output. SRC-1, README.md describes a user's raw meeting account. Natural-language narrative is interpreted by Sig; voice is optional, but transcription and initial storage substrate are unspecified. It can report decisions and commitments with truth conditions over that meeting. No concrete account or provenance trace is supplied. The capture/synthesis/share passage is retained in the parent record.

EPI-OBJ-factual-record

Label: Factual record

Part of: RT-RTE-capture-share

Distinct private output part: the factual layer, not the personal interpretation or org draft. SRC-1, README.md identifies natural-language work records retained as local markdown in the chosen folder. File schema and links to original capture are uninspected. Its load-bearing source passage is retained in RT-CLM-private-sharing. Factual is the product's role label, not a verified truth status.

EPI-OBJ-personal-layer

Label: Personal layer

Part of: RT-RTE-capture-share

Distinct private interpretive output part. SRC-1, README.md describes the user's read on what the facts mean, stored locally with the private notes and not shared. Natural-language interpretation has human/model consumption; local markdown is the declared substrate. Some contents could assert explanations; others could express attitudes. Neither is instantiated here. Evidence passage is see RT-CLM-private-sharing. File-level separation and access enforcement are uninspected.

EPI-OBJ-org-version

Label: Org-level version

Part of: RT-RTE-capture-share

Distinct proposed team-facing account, not either private layer. SRC-1, README.md says Sig prepares a clean org-level version for exact-text review, then team knowledge is synchronized using git. Natural-language content is interpreted by reviewer and downstream AI. Draft storage and exact shared encoding are unspecified; local notes are markdown, but that alone does not establish a team schema. Evidence passage is see the parent record. No specimen establishes what was preserved or removed.

Routes

EPI-RTE-private-synthesis

Label: Private synthesis

Part of: RT-RTE-capture-share

This is the private transformation part, separate from the parent's publication progression. Endpoints are EPI-OBJ-capture and the factual/personal output layers. Sig is the declared synthesizer; the user supplies the account. SRC-1, README.md and RELEASE_NOTES_v0.1.0-beta.md declare the operation; the minimum passage is retained in the parent. Synthesis prompts, model attribution and semantic checks are unavailable. The source's guidance is to structure the account and separate facts from personal observations. Human initiation is not disclosed per-content approval of the local write. Rejection, veto and rollback of synthesis are uninspected; local deletion is separately declared. Mode is open user capture; no reference-answer oracle or improvement trigger is disclosed.

  • Immediate return: Structured private note is advertised; no instance supplied.
  • Later read-back: Work history is advertised for later AI context; exact consumption is uninspected.
  • Delegated visibility: Private material is declared local; inference payload visibility is unresolved.
  • Selection predicate: Capture initiates synthesis; factual/personal classification rules are uninspected.
  • Invalidation or expiry: uninspected — no synthesis correction or versioning policy supplied.
  • Activation or effect: Claimed private note production, not observed semantic separation.
  • Evidence limits: Documentation without prompts, code, inputs, outputs or checks; content relation indeterminate.
  • documentation conclusion status: claimed
  • implementation conclusion status: uninspected
  • operation conclusion status: uninspected

EPI-RTE-org-draft

Label: Org draft

Part of: RT-RTE-capture-share

This is the team-facing proposal transformation, distinct from private synthesis and the send decision. SRC-1, README.md, parent passage, declares Sig prepares a clean org-level version from capture material and presents exact text to the user. It does not expose the input subset, transformation rules, original-text comparison or omitted context. Sig proposes; the human can withhold the later share and decide inclusion. Guidance is organizational relevance and separation from the personal layer. This is open capture-driven drafting, not a curriculum; no oracle, evidence-responsive revision mechanism, draft recovery or truth acceptance is disclosed. The proposed org text may later persist if shared; draft lifetime is unknown.

  • Immediate return: Proposed org-level text for review.
  • Later read-back: uninspected — draft reload is unspecified; approved team text is covered separately.
  • Delegated visibility: User sees proposed text; no draft-stage team visibility is declared.
  • Selection predicate: User decides inclusion; automatic preparation policy is uninspected.
  • Invalidation or expiry: uninspected — no draft rejection storage or expiry policy supplied.
  • Activation or effect: Claimed preparation and review opportunity; not observed preservation of meaning.
  • Evidence limits: No concrete draft, provenance map or semantic evaluator; relation indeterminate.
  • documentation conclusion status: claimed
  • implementation conclusion status: uninspected
  • operation conclusion status: uninspected

EPI-RTE-share-approval

Label: Share approval

Part of: RT-RTE-capture-share

This is the publication-disposition part, not the draft producer or retention step. SRC-1, README.md, parent passage, gives the user the inclusion decision, exact-text review and send action; RT-CLM-private-sharing retains the explicit-approval claim. Target/domain is permission to publish this organizational text to the team. No named truth criterion, evidence input, reference answer or recorded correctness decision is disclosed. Human review may in practice catch errors, but neither that practice nor an operative truth-check result is evidenced. The human decides and can veto; Sig prepares and is claimed to gate send. Trigger is a proposed share, guidance is private-by-default selective sharing, persisted change is team availability of approved text. Mode is open user work. Recovery and remote rollback are uninspected. Operational permission is not acceptance under the epistemic-report definition.

  • Immediate return: Permission to send selected text, or withheld publication; acknowledgment unspecified.
  • Later read-back: Approved content is claimed to become teammate context.
  • Delegated visibility: Team receives the organizational material; exact recipient scope is unspecified.
  • Selection predicate: Human decides contents and explicitly sends after review.
  • Invalidation or expiry: uninspected — no revocation or correction propagation described.
  • Activation or effect: Human publication gate claimed; enforcement and successful send unobserved.
  • Evidence limits: No executable gate or reviewed instance; no demonstrated truth acceptance.
  • documentation conclusion status: claimed
  • implementation conclusion status: uninspected
  • operation conclusion status: uninspected

EPI-RTE-note-retention

Label: Note retention

Part of: RT-RTE-capture-share

This separates persistence from transformation, publication disposition and later use. SRC-1, README.md, declares local markdown in a selected folder and git-backed central team knowledge; passages are retained in the parent and RT-CLM-private-sharing. Local private layers and approved team content have different admission policies: per-local-write approval is unspecified; team publication requires user approval. Sig owns declared note writes and git handles team synchronization. There is no documented evidence-acceptance prerequisite, evidence linkage or integration after truth acceptance. Guidance is capture retention and selective team sharing, not a named correctness criterion; no oracle or improvement trigger is given. Local delete is available, remote rollback is unresolved.

  • Immediate return: Claimed local files and, after approval, team knowledge availability.
  • Later read-back: Private history and teammate context advertised; selector and exact payload unknown.
  • Delegated visibility: Local personal layer versus approved team layer, as declared; provider payload not enumerated.
  • Selection predicate: Capture for local retention; explicit user selection for publication.
  • Invalidation or expiry: Local deletion permitted; remote expiry, conflicts and supersession uninspected.
  • Activation or effect: Retention and synchronization claimed; no runtime persistence trace supplied.
  • Evidence limits: Markdown substrate and git mechanism do not establish lineage, truth acceptance or semantic integrity.
  • documentation conclusion status: claimed
  • implementation conclusion status: uninspected
  • operation conclusion status: uninspected

EPI-RTE-context-use

Label: Context use

Part of: RT-RTE-capture-share

This is the parent's later-consumption part, separate from transport and storage. SRC-1, README.md, parent passage and EPI-CLM-context-payoff, declares history usable by AI and shared knowledge immediately available as teammate context. Consumer is later AI tooling or teammate Sig; exact request, content subset, insertion point and context-control policy are not supplied. Claimed force is advisory context through natural-language interpretation, not an enforced instruction or demonstrated compliance. No check precedes disclosed use beyond the publication gate for the team layer. Personal-layer inclusion in provider requests remains unresolved; direct requests are separately described in RT-RTE-provider-message.

  • Immediate return: uninspected — no context selector response or constructed request supplied.
  • Later read-back: Accumulated private history and approved team knowledge are advertised as later context.
  • Delegated visibility: Teammate Sig receives shared context; provider-visible subset unknown.
  • Selection predicate: uninspected — no query, ranking, inclusion rule or request policy supplied.
  • Invalidation or expiry: uninspected — no stale-context eviction or correction handling supplied.
  • Activation or effect: Context delivery and improved AI work claimed; actual influence unobserved.
  • Evidence limits: No selected payload, invocation trace, response or comparison; delivery is not warrant or benefit.
  • documentation conclusion status: claimed
  • implementation conclusion status: uninspected
  • operation conclusion status: uninspected

EPI-RTE-local-deletion

Label: Local deletion

Distinct responsibility from the capture/share progression: user removal of retained local files, overlapping its persistence endpoint but not contained in its production sequence. SRC-1, README.md and RELEASE_NOTES_v0.1.0-beta.md explicitly permit deletion and say uninstall leaves captures intact. Owner is the user acting on local storage. No proposition-level rejection, evidence-driven revision or team retraction route follows. Trigger is user choice, change is local removal, veto is the user's decision not to delete, and recovery is unspecified. This is not an oracle-guided or improvement-mode route.

Captures and notes are stored as plain markdown in the folder you choose during first-run setup. --- RELEASE_NOTES_v0.1.0-beta.md

Drag Sig from Applications to the Trash (macOS), or remove the package via your package manager (Linux). Your captures stay on your computer as plain markdown in the folder you picked during setup. Delete that folder if you want them gone. --- RELEASE_NOTES_v0.1.0-beta.md

  • Immediate return: Claimed local file removal by user action; uninstall alone preserves files.
  • Later read-back: uninspected — whether removed files cease reaching cached context is unspecified.
  • Delegated visibility: inapplicable — local deletion itself has no described recipient; remote copies remain unresolved.
  • Selection predicate: User chooses files or the capture folder for deletion.
  • Invalidation or expiry: Local removal is described; remote invalidation and recovery uninspected.
  • Activation or effect: User ability declared; no deletion run or propagated withdrawal shown.
  • Evidence limits: No deletion implementation or cached/remote consumer trace; no global withdrawal inference.
  • documentation conclusion status: claimed
  • implementation conclusion status: uninspected
  • operation conclusion status: uninspected

Claims

EPI-CLM-factual-layer

Label: Factual layer

SRC-1, README.md claims separation and saving of a factual record and personal interpretation; RELEASE_NOTES_v0.1.0-beta.md reports the corresponding beta function. This claim concerns output organization, not an explicit evidence-consuming truth test. Closest supplied claim is RT-CLM-private-sharing, which owns privacy/publication authority and retains the two-layer passage. This is a distinct claim about synthesis's semantic organization, not a duplicate privacy guarantee.

  • Synthesis — facts separated from your personal layer, stored on your machine --- RELEASE_NOTES_v0.1.0-beta.md

EPI-CLM-context-payoff

Label: Context payoff

SRC-1, README.md claims accumulated history makes AI dramatically sharper. No supplied claim record has this referent: RT-CLM-private-sharing addresses privacy, and RT-RTE-capture-share quotes the benefit in its surrounding account but declares a workflow, not a benefit claim. The doctrine supports intended reuse, not observed learning or causal improvement. Target tasks, contrast, metric and assessment horizon beyond the rhetorical week labels are unspecified.

Week 12: You've built something nobody else has — months of real work history that makes every AI you use dramatically sharper. --- README.md