Tendril profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes in the memory comparison against the handed analyst records and their annotations, resolving identities through the supplied reconciliation. The profile uses the canonical source object and listing route, retains the distinct description and invocation-policy parts, and distinguishes program mutation from human editing. No unresolved report conflict changes these classifications. The following dispositions concern support and meaning, not a repetition of deterministic citation or schema checks.

  • Storage substrate and representational form: The file finding is supported for selection text, index bookkeeping and executable source. Their grouping on storage does not conceal different substrates in those known parts. The form units distinguish interpreted descriptions/conditions from fixed-rule metadata and Deno-consumed TypeScript. Optional text inside actual programs and opaque retained-context alternatives remain unresolved rather than inheriting the inspected representation. See MEM-OBJ-selection-text, MEM-OBJ-index-metadata, MEM-OBJ-tool-source, EPI-OBJ-capability and EPI-OBJ-triggers-suppression.
  • Lineage: Authored registration/editor paths and software-derived bookkeeping support the respective authored and other-compiled findings. These path-specific positives do not attest preexisting files, subsequent program-written bytes or SDK derivation. Those alternatives remain explicitly unresolved. See RT-RTE-capability-admission, RT-RTE-editor-mutation, MEM-OBJ-index-metadata and RT-RTE-program-mutation.
  • Behavioral authority: Description-as-reference, invocation conditions as standing directions and model-mediated operation selection, and executable source as directions at Deno each have a named consumed part, consumer and effect. Routing does not assert fixed dispatch, and suppression text is not classified as an enforced veto. The claimed learning finding belongs to failure feedback at the requested update consumer, not to an inference that executable code itself proves learning or that transient stdout is independently durable memory. The resulting retained code has a separate downstream instruction path. See MEM-BAP-selection-guidance, MEM-RTE-capability-list, RT-BAP-capability-source and EPI-RTE-failure-repair.
  • Write agency: The three admission mechanisms retain their own bases: automatic wired registration, automatic afforded program mutation and manual wired editor replacement. The profile does not transfer the editor's confirmation to the generic backend or to program writes. Initial admission and unspecified callers remain unresolved. See RT-RTE-capability-admission, RT-RTE-program-mutation and RT-RTE-editor-mutation.
  • Curation operations: Same-name replacement and editor revision support wired evolution of existing retained content. Requested failure-guided repair supports a distinct claimed evolution finding, not a wired repair controller. Listing projection is not retained consolidation; temporary-script deletion is not durable-memory curation. Unknown generated transformations and SDK compaction are not assigned absent operations. See RT-RTE-capability-admission, RT-RTE-editor-mutation, EPI-RTE-failure-repair, MEM-RTE-capability-list and RT-RTE-prompt-stream.
  • Read-back direction and signal: Requested listing, named execution and human inspection support pull. Fulfillment is not counted again as push; the requested filename does not establish identifier-based push. The inspected request-driven units can have inapplicable push signals, while unresolved SDK/generated alternatives prevent an axis-wide inapplicable assessment. See MEM-RTE-capability-list, RT-RTE-capability-execution, MEM-RTE-capability-browser and RT-RTE-prompt-stream.
  • Trace learning and trace source: The failure-repair instruction supports a claimed automatic feedback-to-durable-replacement-to-later-execution chain. Tool failures support tool-traces as its claimed original input. The implemented storage and execution endpoints do not upgrade requested feedback use to wired or observed repair. Additional conversational inputs, other registration/program updates and SDK summaries remain unresolved; no unsupported local or system-wide negative is emitted. See EPI-RTE-failure-repair, EPI-RTE-result-disposition, RT-RTE-capability-admission and RT-RTE-capability-execution.

The partial inventories preserve the positive findings without claiming complete system coverage. Known units are bounded to the identified paths or evidence layers; shared units group classifications with the same coverage rather than upgrade opaque alternatives. The profile's uninspected signal axis has no unsupported positive. Its unresolved units are faithful uncertainty, not additional verification limits. The explicit exclusions keep static instructions, runtime settings, provider weights and ordinary current-run display state from enlarging the memory union. In particular, MEM-OBJ-agent-display does not establish an SDK checkpoint or a durable trace-learning route.

The supported comparison is architectural and, for repair, partly doctrinal. It establishes neither actual reuse nor successful repair, improved capacity or causal benefit. Those qualifications already accompany the emitted values and their bases. No unsupported value, absence, evidence upgrade or complete-coverage assertion requiring correction was found.

Source-read log: none. This verification used only the supplied members and contracts; no source ambiguity required reading the frozen checkout.

Blockers

none

Limits

none