OKF reconciliation

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

Evidence and scope

The reports share the whole-system boundary and sole frozen source in boundary and its Source register. Their implementation and doctrine/design findings do not establish observed operation or causal benefit. This reconciliation uses only the supplied members; no source rereads were needed. No correction answers or declined objections were supplied.

Duplicate identities

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-concept is superseded by MEM-OBJ-concept-body. Both name retained natural-language concept bodies on disk, parsed for search and interpreted by later agents or humans. The produce and authoring passages in the epistemic record identify the same prose whose produce/migrate lineage and later consumption the memory record describes. This is not the shipped procedural skill. The epistemic inventory and ledger's concept citations and the memory report's body findings concern the same object; supersession connects those findings without turning requested distillation into observed production, semantic preservation or accepted novelty. Both declarations remain.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-provenance is superseded by MEM-OBJ-concept-metadata. Both identify symbolic concept frontmatter for generation, verification, sources, status and expiry, separate from body prose. The authoring passage distinguishing generated from verified and the Concept classifier passage retained by memory establish matching referents. The epistemic trust-tier and attention-pairing findings remain additional consumer findings on this metadata; they do not become findings of authenticated review. The epistemic record's description of a distinct operative part separates metadata from prose, not a second metadata object.

Amendment: EPI-RTE-reconcile-search is superseded by MEM-RTE-reconcile-search. Both trace the same Pro Reconcile implementation: eligible Write event, filename-derived terms, bounded search hits excluding self, deprecated annotation, and a request for the agent to inspect possible collisions. Both retain the Write-only branch and deprecated-status passage from SRC-1, gems/okf-pro/lib/okf/pro/reconcile.rb. Both are parts of RT-RTE-pro-gates, not replacements of the enclosing gate route. The epistemic record adds the post-edit dispatch passage and refusal-style consumer consequence; memory already allows follow-up under that host protocol. Neither claims pre-write semantic veto, automatic contradiction resolution or observed repair. Their different labels do not establish different routes.

Containment and overlaps that are not duplicates

RT-RTE-skill-work remains the valid enclosing consume/maintain route. EPI-RTE-semantic-review identifies its requested source/meaning check; WF-RTE-maintenance-closeout identifies its finishing checks and task-completion decision. These parts overlap in agent judgment but have different endpoints and targets. Neither is identical to the parent or to the other. EPI-RTE-semantic-disposition instead spans maintenance and Pro conflict handling: it describes requested changes of reliance after judgment, not the checking operation or the filename search. No supersession among these routes is warranted.

MEM-RTE-snapshot-context, EPI-RTE-read-pairing, and the reconciliation-search route above are different parts of RT-RTE-pro-gates. Snapshot derivation, caller retention, Stop comparison and later banner supply differ from trust-sensitive board obligations and from vocabulary feedback. The parent's admission, shell, journal, commit and CI findings remain meaningful as a container; separation does not make those findings wrong. MEM-RTE-friction-feedback shares the banner endpoint but owns an additional raw-intent recording/reporting chain, not the complete gate identity.

EPI-RTE-structural-check owns analyzer predicates shared by several consumers. It is not identical to RT-RTE-publish-bundle, RT-RTE-curation-feedback, or WF-RTE-maintenance-closeout: these consume checking results for publication, advisory context or task completion. EPI-OBJ-findings is a valid result-family description, not another identity for the retained board, journal, log or metadata. MEM-OBJ-snapshot names the separately consumed retained counter line within MEM-OBJ-log, rather than all transient findings. No container needs supersession by these parts.

MEM-OBJ-references and EPI-OBJ-computation overlap but are not coextensive. Memory distinguishes payloads, path inventory and the offered executor/attester contract, including inline or elsewhere-stored computations. Epistemic isolates the fixed binding/check contract rather than all reference payloads and inventory. The records do not establish identity of the whole referents, so neither supersedes the other. EPI-RTE-run-attestation and EPI-RTE-display-gate are distinct specified checking and verdict-disposition routes, not implemented MCP retrieval or Pro owner-permission checks.

RT-BAP-skill-guidance concerns shipped procedural instructions; MEM-BAP-retained-knowledge concerns acquired or revised corpus content. They can reach the same agent without being the same path. RT-BAP-hook-protocol concerns admission machinery, whereas MEM-BAP-state-context concerns interpreted opening priorities from retained state. Shared host delivery does not establish identity. The new memory index, log, board, journal, snapshot, friction and reference objects likewise do not duplicate the runtime's skill or hook settings.

The epistemic claims distinguish durable explanations, build-visible drift, owner-review intent and per-call computation fidelity from RT-CLM-live-bodies. Related warrant questions do not make these claims duplicates.

Independent convergence and integration dispositions

The memory annotations on RT-RTE-skill-work, the epistemic semantic-review/disposition records and the workflow closeout account converge on agent-owned semantic maintenance with structural evidence. Workflow supplies validate's failure exit and lint's default advisory exit; epistemic supplies predicate limits. This supports different completion and admission functions, not a stronger shared semantic acceptance gate. Runtime's wired route status covers executable command paths; epistemic's doctrine-only semantic-transformation rows cover requested agent behavior. Their different units and status vocabularies are not a disagreement.

The memory integration issues preserve runtime's direct-edit bypass, freshness qualifications, per-file atomicity and external-host limits. RT-RTE-publish-bundle gates its own publication path; RT-RTE-pro-writes constrains mechanical deltas; direct edits persist before workflow closeout. None supplies universal write approval, semantic truth or group rollback. EPI-RTE-trust-tier and EPI-RTE-read-pairing add consequential classification and attention rules without contradicting memory's warning that metadata does not authenticate human review.

RT-RTE-mcp-retrieve, its memory annotation and the epistemic live-body comparison retain the same distinction: live bytes at resolved ids are not universally fresh selection metadata. Search projections, snippets, graph views and truncated logs need not deliver retained reasons. The absence of an overall host-window guarantee does not negate the implemented selective-supply controls. Optional backend internals remain unresolved rather than absent; fallback findings cannot settle their representation, persistence or invalidation.

Memory's snapshot and friction chains establish distinct retained-state consumers, not automatic durable lesson extraction or method revision. The epistemic policy-change account and RT-RTE-refine-proposal keep learning, reflection, theory-builder conditions and exercised self-improvement independent. No supplied later-task evidence closes those stronger conclusions. Likewise the references and computation records consistently separate inventory and contract access from actual executor/attester operation. These are shared evidence limits, not unresolved inter-report disagreements.

No incompatible cross-report finding or missing required operative part is identified in the supplied records. No unresolved-conflict paragraph is therefore asserted. The duplicate supersessions above connect independent declarations; the remaining integration issues stay as bounded limitations, without selecting a stronger status or revising an analyst's finding.