OKF memory profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes in the profile, including each finding's scope, basis, coverage assessment and natural unit. I resolved the three duplicate supersessions before judging support: the canonical concept-body, metadata and collision-feedback records are the memory declarations. No replacement record, new quotation or source read was needed. The supplied profile answers are empty.

  • Storage substrate: File storage is supported for the retained corpus, work records, telemetry and local reference assets. Process-local parsed views are access structures, not an alternative durable corpus. The journal's Git-history input supports only the claimed repository finding. The optional backend remains separately uninspected; its package name establishes no storage value. See MEM-OBJ-journal, MEM-OBJ-references and RT-RTE-mcp-retrieve.
  • Representational form: Prose interpretation and fixed-rule metadata/counter consumption are separated even where they share a file. The computation contract's symbolic form does not classify arbitrary payloads. Documented code and run-instruction paths retain afforded strength, while unknown payload and backend forms remain unresolved. See MEM-OBJ-concept-metadata, MEM-OBJ-board, MEM-OBJ-references and EPI-OBJ-computation.
  • Lineage: Authored semantic paths, verbatim migration and fixed mechanical derivations have distinct warrants. Known later transformations do not resolve initial caller content or arbitrary payload provenance. Neither raw event retention nor a Learning label is treated as trace-extracted lesson lineage. See MEM-OBJ-concept-body, MEM-OBJ-friction and RT-RTE-pro-writes.
  • Behavioral authority: The findings identify actual consumers and effects: interpreted task context, search priority, result membership, board-cap refusal and trust-sensitive pairing. The grouped search and checking units keep these effects distinct in their findings. Specified computation validation/refusal is not upgraded to implemented execution. Static hook and skill machinery is not counted as accumulated memory. See MEM-BAP-retained-knowledge, EPI-RTE-trust-tier, EPI-RTE-read-pairing, RT-RTE-pro-writes and EPI-RTE-display-gate.
  • Write agency: Ordinary agent admission without per-content approval supports claimed automatic agency; owner verification and refine approval support bounded manual decisions. Mechanical writers and instrumented event appends support wired automatic admission. Generic caller identity leaves initial content and Snapshot retention unresolved. Starting a command is not substituted for approving each output. See RT-RTE-skill-work, EPI-RTE-semantic-review, RT-RTE-refine-proposal, RT-RTE-pro-writes and MEM-RTE-snapshot-context.
  • Curation operations: Claimed evolution and invalidation follow requested content revision and preserved deprecation context. The profile does not infer synthesis from a request for explanations, or controlled promotion from board placement. Its unresolved distillation/extraction unit is cautious rather than an absence assertion: the records do not establish the precise retained-input transformation. This leaves the emitted evolve/invalidate findings valid without claiming complete curation coverage. See EPI-RTE-semantic-disposition, MEM-OBJ-journal and RT-RTE-pro-writes.
  • Read-back direction: Requested CLI/MCP and human reads are pull. SessionStart and eligible Write feedback automatically supply retained parts and support push. Requested resource return is not counted again as unsolicited supply. The external computation role remains afforded, and unknown payload/backend routes are retained separately. See RT-RTE-mcp-retrieve, MEM-RTE-snapshot-context, MEM-RTE-reconcile-search and MEM-OBJ-references.
  • Read-back signal: The profile names the trigger, selector inputs and retained parts for both classified push paths. Latest-date/category selection supports coarse; automatic filename-term search supports inferred-lexical. Output ids and requested exact-id reads do not establish identifier push. Unknown host attachment selection remains uncertainty, not evidence for a targeted selector. See MEM-RTE-snapshot-context, MEM-RTE-friction-feedback, MEM-RTE-reconcile-search and RT-RTE-mcp-retrieve.
  • Trace learning and trace source: Neither improvement evidence nor novel knowledge is required for these axes. Nevertheless, the records do not establish a qualifying automatic trace-fed write of a durable behavior-shaping derivative: Snapshot retention is caller-mediated, friction retains raw intent and computes a transient count, and semantic extraction is requested without a fixed trace-input chain. No accepted absence record licenses a local no. The two unresolved inventories therefore support neither a positive value nor a system-wide negative, and trace source is not inapplicable. See MEM-RTE-snapshot-context, MEM-RTE-friction-feedback, MEM-OBJ-journal and RT-RTE-skill-work.

The eight partial axes retain positive classified witnesses alongside named unresolved alternatives. The two trace axes have no controlled finding and preserve not-determinable coverage. No opaque alternative is silently promoted by a known fallback witness. No finding claims observed operation or causal benefit. These are faithfully scoped uncertainties already carried by the extracted profile, not additional verification limits. I found no material unsupported value, false complete-coverage assessment or contradiction requiring correction.

Blockers

none

Limits

none