SkillWeaver reconciliation

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

The supplied members share the functional boundary and SRC-1 in the Source register. This account reconciles their current findings, not the previous reconciliation's descriptions of them. No correction answers or refusal were supplied. No source reads were needed; evidence passages remain in the cited members.

Duplicate supersessions

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-skill-code is superseded by MEM-OBJ-code. Both identify the callable function definitions in KnowledgeBase.code, represented as Python in an in-process string/AST and _code.py checkpoint. The memory record's name-indexed merge passage and the epistemic record's producer/consumer references concern the same operative part. The epistemic distinction between procedures and implied efficacy claims remains its author's finding about that object; identity does not accept those claims. Affected findings are synthesis, replacement, persistence and later execution. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/knowledge_base/knowledge_base.py, retained in the cited records.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-skill-docstrings is superseded by MEM-OBJ-docstring. Both identify docstrings extracted from functions and delivered through pretty displays or controller descriptions, stored inside _code.py and transient function dictionaries. The memory formatting passage identifies the display channel; the epistemic usage-log passage assesses a concrete claim within that same documentation part. Affected findings are relevance selection, model guidance and the warrant limits of reported usage. This does not supersede executable bodies or infer authenticated success from documentation. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/knowledge_base/knowledge_base.py, skillnet/map/map_kb_post_code.py, retained in the cited records.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-function-metadata is superseded by MEM-OBJ-metadata. Both identify metadata['functions'], test/version/reference/event fields and global_version, stored in a dictionary and _metadata.json. Their scheduling and visibility consumers coincide. The memory record and EPI-RTE-tested-label retain the is_tested and reference-discard passages. Affected findings are tested-label authority, override capability, initialization and lineage. The route that changes or consumes the metadata remains distinct from this object. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/knowledge_base/knowledge_base.py.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-semantic-knowledge is superseded by MEM-OBJ-semantic-knowledge. Both identify the semantic_knowledge string and _semantic_knowledge.txt, supplied as existing context rather than synthesized by the inspected update. Their save/load and semantic_update_diagnostics = None passages concern the same field. Affected findings are import, retention, proposal/synthesis consumption and unknown initial warrant. This identity does not establish semantic-content production. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/knowledge_base/knowledge_base.py, skillweaver/templates/kb_procedural_update_single.md, retained in the cited records.

Distinct records and valid containers

EPI-OBJ-trajectory-string is not identical to MEM-OBJ-traces. The former identifies the selected textual episode; the latter covers raw states/actions, screenshots, selected text and multiple diagnostics. The trace container's findings remain valid when these parts are separated, so no split supersession is warranted. EPI-OBJ-success-result likewise identifies the task-scoped Boolean/reasoning rather than the whole diagnostic container. EPI-OBJ-benchmark-result identifies configured scores/checks, not that success judgment. Storage overlap does not make these results identical. Their separate consumers are EPI-RTE-success-decision and EPI-RTE-score-retention. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/agent.py, skillweaver/explore.py, skillweaver/evaluation/evaluate_single_task.py; passages are retained in those records and their associated routes.

The epistemic routes declare material parts, not duplicate runtime containers:

The larger routes remain valid accounts of progression; no combined finding is made wrong merely by these part declarations. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/agent.py, skillweaver/explore.py, skillweaver/knowledge_base/check_success.py, skillweaver/knowledge_base/knowledge_base.py, skillweaver/knowledge_base/code_verification.py, skillweaver/evaluation/evaluate_single_task.py, skillweaver/evaluation/webarena_evaluators.py; minimum passages remain in the linked records.

EPI-RTE-tested-label spans automatic increments, exposed override and later filtering; it is neither the metadata object nor the entire practice route. MEM-RTE-embedding-selection is an optional selection API, not model-mediated retrieval within the native task route or its provider component RT-CMP-embed. RT-CMP-lm identifies provider-backed components, not success judgments or their output. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/knowledge_base/knowledge_base.py, skillweaver/lm.py; the cited records retain the override, embedding and provider passages.

RT-BAP-library-execution identifies consumers, channels, force and horizon, not the retained code object or the native and RT-RTE-browser-use routes. EPI-CLM-website-knowledge identifies synthesis instructions' content contract, not the README's RT-CLM-self-improvement claim. RT-ABS-cua-module concerns missing implementation, not the enclosing benchmark route. Their cited evidence concerns different referents; none requires supersession. Workflow declares no records to supersede.

Disagreement and correction disposition

No current cross-report disagreement was identified. The previous reconciliation's conflict about dynamic skill execution no longer describes the supplied runtime, memory or workflow findings. RT-RTE-native-task and RT-RTE-explore-practice explicitly limit the shortcut to syntactic named-call occurrence plus exception/recovery result fields. MEM-OBJ-metadata, its practice annotation and the workflow account now retain that same distinction and the dead-branch countercase supplied by EPI-RTE-test-check. A matching AST node can exist without executing the named skill; later counter authority remains supported through EPI-RTE-tested-label. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/attempt_task.py, skillweaver/explore.py, skillweaver/knowledge_base/knowledge_base.py, with passages retained in the cited records.

The epistemic test record still describes its countercase as qualifying supplied runtime “successful test”/“error-free execution” wording. That description points to the earlier stronger wording, not a stronger finding in the current runtime record. Its substantive predicate assessment agrees with the current peers; the memory integration issues explicitly recognize the corrected runtime. No supplied dependent finding still requires proof of dynamic skill execution from this predicate. Accordingly, the previous conflict is not carried forward. This disposition connects the current statements without judging their support or rewriting any analyst's record.

Independent convergence and remaining integration limits

The recovery-text issue is a refinement, not a disagreement. MEM-OBJ-traces, EPI-RTE-trajectory-format and the workflow annotation distinguish the expanded native rendering from the default builder rendering that overwrites it. RT-RTE-locator-recovery already limits durable repair through that update input. Raw JSON surviving does not contradict omission from delivered synthesis context. The final screenshot independently reaches the success checker, not the shown synthesis call. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/attempt_task.py, skillweaver/agent.py, skillweaver/explore.py, skillweaver/knowledge_base/check_success.py; supporting passages remain in the cited members.

The memory no-duplicate statement compares its declarations with supplied runtime records, which include no operative objects. The epistemic no-supplied-counterpart descriptions likewise concern their supplied baseline. Neither rules out the four cross-specialist identities established above. The amendments preserve both analysts' findings while connecting shared referents.

RT-RTE-skill-admission, EPI-RTE-code-check, EPI-RTE-skill-merge, memory's admission annotation and the workflow account converge on bounded repair followed by unconditional application after exhaustion, with parse/format failures still possible. This operational installation is compatible with the epistemic limit on acceptance of generalized efficacy/documentation claims. EPI-RTE-success-decision accepts an episode for synthesis input, not the unseen generalized candidate. Physical save/load and tested visibility are separate controls. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/knowledge_base/knowledge_base.py, skillweaver/explore.py; retry, merge and branch passages remain in the linked records.

The benchmark container's implementation status afforded and its epistemic checking/retention parts' wired statuses assess different scopes. The runtime carries enclosing-entry defects, including RT-ABS-cua-module; the epistemic parts inspect local scoring and output code while retaining those activation limits. Memory's benchmark annotation relies on the runtime rather than an independent evaluator audit. No member establishes an observed score or score-fed skill update. These are compatible findings, not a strongest-status merger. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/evaluation/evaluate_single_task.py, skillweaver/evaluation/evaluate_benchmark.py, skillweaver/evaluation/webarena_evaluators.py, retained in the cited benchmark records.

The remaining memory integration issues are bounded uncertainties. Arbitrary initial code, documentation and semantic text have unknown provenance/approval. Ultimate callers of tool-schema exports, blanket marking and embedding selection are not established by the reported scoped searches. Partial fallback metadata and aliased copy metadata qualify initialization and rollback, without negating known normal save/reload. These limits belong to MEM-OBJ-code, MEM-OBJ-docstring, MEM-OBJ-semantic-knowledge, MEM-OBJ-metadata and MEM-RTE-embedding-selection. The epistemic warrant/override limits are compatible; no peer establishes the missing facts. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/knowledge_base/knowledge_base.py, skillnet/map/map_kb_post_code.py, retained in the cited records.

Finally, the runtime admission and claim records, memory write/read-back account, epistemic bounded conclusion and workflow delivery account converge on an improvement-directed dispositional self-change path with later executable consumers. None establishes later causal dependence on a particular update or successful improvement. Provider-state opacity remains independent of symbolic skill persistence. Missing execution evidence does not erase the supported wiring; wiring does not establish exercised operation or benefit. Evidence: SRC-1, skillweaver/explore.py, skillweaver/knowledge_base/knowledge_base.py, skillweaver/agent.py; the connected route passages remain in the cited members.