OpenSage profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes, their natural units, findings, evidence bases and coverage assessments against the handed analyst records, resolving supersessions through the supplied reconciliation. No target source was read. The previous verification and the profile author's correction answer were assessed as arguments, not binding judgments. No refusal of this verification was supplied.

The profile separates accumulated memory from static shipped instructions, ordinary inference weights and task-source graphs. All axes remain partial. Opaque service payloads, live retention, trainer updates and extension alternatives remain included uncertainties. The emitted findings do not assert observed activation, improved capacity, causal benefit or system-complete absence. Grouped witnesses retain their named local scopes rather than establishing exhaustive inventories.

Canonical findings and tool-summary objects, and the canonical reduction route, are used after supersession. Finding check/write/delivery remain separate functions: their internal wired witnesses do not upgrade the unresolved shipped invocation in MEM-RTE-finding-admission. The scoped registration differences between reports are not contradictory completeness claims. Pin-read failure, non-cumulative summary replacement, image-copy uncertainty and external trainer adoption remain bounded mechanism qualifications, not evidence against the positive classifications.

Blockers

none

Limits

  • The partial lineage inventory omits recorded caller-finding and appended-analysis derivations in MEM-OBJ-findings and EPI-RTE-finding-write, and the model-generation/parsing/serialization path in MEM-OBJ-vulnerability-findings and MEM-RTE-findings-resume. The profile rationale now explicitly acknowledges these omissions. The emitted authored, imported, compiled and trace-extracted witnesses remain supported; withhold object-complete lineage comparisons for findings and vulnerability checkpoints. This local inventory gap does not change a supported system-level value or imply complete coverage.