sqz reconciliation
Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md
Reconciliation
The four reports share the frozen boundary and its Source register. Their implementation findings concern SRC-1 at the same revision; none supplies observed model operation or causal benefit. This reconciliation uses their accepted records and passages without additional source reads. No correction answers or refusal were supplied. It connects findings without judging their support or changing their statuses.
Duplicate identity and valid containers
Amendment: EPI-OBJ-session-state is superseded by MEM-OBJ-session. Both identify the same typed SessionState: conversation, summary, learning key/value and correction fields, serialized for persistent session storage and consumed by import/load/resume. The epistemic record's CTX envelope is the interchange representation of that session, not a second session object. Identity evidence is the SessionState envelope passage in the epistemic record and the SessionState field and storage passages in the memory record, SRC-1, sqz_engine/src/ctx_format.rs, sqz_engine/src/types.rs, sqz_engine/src/session_store.rs. The affected epistemic inventory, import and resume ledger entries retain their findings about structural admission and advisory guide influence; this amendment does not replace them with stronger conclusions. The memory record adds unresolved acquisition, same-ID replacement and synthetic-row limits, rather than proving an acceptance history.
No other record identity is established after comparison:
- EPI-OBJ-context-text spans acquired and delivered context across routes. MEM-OBJ-cache-original and MEM-OBJ-cache-compressed identify particular persistent raw and derived representations. Neither alone replaces the broader content family, and the broader family is not identical to their pair: it also includes current response bodies. The records remain alongside each other; no split supersession is warranted by these findings.
- EPI-OBJ-verify-result is a diagnostic result, not the stored compressed representation that may contain verification metadata. EPI-OBJ-fixture-outcome is a test-process result, not MEM-OBJ-operation-metadata, which covers production logs and separate in-memory recommendations. Overlapping numerical fields do not establish object identity.
- EPI-RTE-preservation-check and EPI-RTE-fallback-select are declared parts of RT-RTE-engine-compress. Checking and disposition remain separate functions inside a valid engine container; they do not supersede it. Likewise, MEM-RTE-dependency-precache is a declared write subpath of RT-RTE-cli-compress, not a replacement CLI route.
- EPI-RTE-ctx-import and EPI-RTE-resume-guide describe different stages of MEM-RTE-session-continuity, which also covers export and installed delivery. Neither stage equals that combined route. The combined record remains valid alongside the narrower functions; no supersession is made.
- MEM-RTE-recall-search selects snippets and locators by query; RT-RTE-cache-recovery can then resolve a known hash. MEM-RTE-cache-maintenance changes policy or withdraws storage rather than duplicating ordinary admission/expansion. MEM-OBJ-known-files is metadata, not cached content. These distinctions prevent collapsing the routes and objects by their shared database.
- MEM-OBJ-snapshot covers checkpoint events and guide representations, not another SessionState. MEM-CMP-library-stores and MEM-CMP-context-controls concern alternative APIs, not duplicate deployed native cache, pipeline or file-tool routes.
- MEM-BAP-reference-policy concerns deterministic code consumption of metadata; RT-BAP-host-guidance concerns interpreted instructions at an external agent. Shared effects on context do not make their consumers, channels or force identical.
Independent convergence and integration dispositions
Preservation checks and delivery. The runtime's best-effort engine account connects to the epistemic check/disposition parts above. The workflow annotations add the enclosing proxy's size/risk/savings gates, rather than another verifier. All distinguish representation admission from verification of the user's task answer. The workflow also states that storage can precede rejection of a replacement and that panic passthrough does not undo earlier side effects. This refines RT-RTE-mcp-proxy; it does not contradict its wired, operation-uninspected account.
Delta freshness qualification. Memory's first integration issue qualifies the combined cache account using MEM-OBJ-cache-compressed: the inspected delta baseline compares compressed data without the exact-reference freshness test, SRC-1, sqz_engine/src/cache_manager.rs. RT-RTE-cache-recovery describes reference freshness separately from similarity selection. The epistemic ledger's “Fresh reference/delta/recovery consumption” label must be read with those route-specific limits, not as evidence that every delta baseline passes reference freshness. The records do not explicitly assert opposing implementations, so this is a scope qualification rather than an established cross-report disagreement. A uniform freshness guarantee cannot be concluded; downstream reconstruction remains unobserved.
Session acquisition and checkpoint alternatives. Memory's second and third integration issues add information where runtime and epistemic leave acquisition open. MEM-OBJ-session establishes that dashboard-only rows may fail typed loading; MEM-RTE-session-continuity supplies the installed SessionStart compact command and latest-session selection without project scoping. EPI-RTE-resume-guide leaves external adoption uninspected and says cmd_resume alone does not show injection. These are compatible boundaries: an installed hook command is not observed model consumption. The memory checkpoint record distinguishes the budgeted snapshot builder/store/load capability from CLI resume's direct projection of sessions.data. Its no-original checkpoint save also does not establish normal output indexing. No report may be connected into an automatic full-session acquisition → PreCompact snapshot save → checkpoint restoration loop on these findings.
Pinning and withdrawal. Memory's fourth issue limits any blanket privacy or residency inference. MEM-RTE-cache-maintenance distinguishes cache pins, session pins, lower-level pin-add admission, hypothetical compact evictions, LRU and reset scopes. This complements runtime's lower-level API and no-cache warnings, not a contradictory universal guarantee. Freshness invalidation does not delete payloads or host messages; ordinary CLI reset does not erase every store. The unresolved scope in the epistemic maintenance coverage is not a disagreement with memory's additional inspection.
Recovery and public claims. RT-CLM-recoverable-results is a recorded product promise, not the runtime analyst's unconditional endorsement. Runtime, memory, epistemic and the workflow recovery account converge on captured-original and surviving-storage limits. Workflow adds UTF-8 replacement at proxy expansion; memory distinguishes binary recoverability from search index coverage. Thus storage-level byte recovery, MCP text delivery and original whole-file identity remain different claims, without a cross-report conflict.
Evaluation and adaptation. MEM-CLM-evaluation-scope describes evaluator design; EPI-CLM-fact-recall records a reported benchmark result; the recoverability claim concerns a different promise. These are not duplicate claims. EPI-RTE-fixture-check and EPI-RTE-regression-gate distinguish measurement from test disposition. Authored fixtures provide bounded references, whereas the production workflow has no expected-task-answer oracle. No disagreement follows from those different domains. Memory's fifth issue and the epistemic conclusion both withhold automatic learning or self-improvement inferences from raw logs, separate recommendations, stored corrections or available APIs; neither turns uninspected helper paths into a system-complete absence.
No remaining explicit disagreement between report findings is established by these inputs. The identity amendment and qualifications above retain the distinct scopes, unknowns and evidence layers; they do not select stronger statuses, judge support or establish successful operation.