SoL-Pi reconciliation

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

Boundary and record connections

All four reports use the boundary and its Source register. They distinguish source-inspected implementation and doctrine from unsupplied execution and causal evidence. Their different inspection scopes do not supply competing operation statuses. The workflow declares no additional records; its annotations develop the existing subprocess route. No correction answers or declined objections were supplied to this attempt.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-observation-text is superseded by MEM-OBJ-observation. Both identify the same source-native Observation text, local UTF-8 archive, symbolic identity metadata and deterministic placeholder projection in SRC-1, src/sol-pi/extensions/observation-pack/observation.ts. The epistemic record's newline assembly and complete-line excerpt findings concern that same payload and projection; they remain attached to its declared ID. The memory record adds replay-accounting and recall-integrity detail, not a different observation identity. Neither object supersedes RT-RTE-observation-replay, which is the production/projection/recall route rather than its payload.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-exported-context is superseded by MEM-OBJ-context-export. Both identify the same rendered host-transcript prefix produced by SRC-1, examples/sol-pi-skill/bin/sol-pi-context and delivered in the delegated prompt. Both retain clipping, current-handoff removal and the newest-block budget exception. The epistemic record additionally identifies the Codex adapter's false error flag and its provenance consequence; supersession does not discard that finding. The prefix is not identical to RT-RTE-skill-handoff, its enclosing invocation and return route, or MEM-OBJ-run-result, its outward result artifact.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-crop-artifact is superseded by MEM-OBJ-magnify-artifact. Both identify the same source-native crop/reference-crop PNGs and RECEIPT.json produced by SRC-1, examples/solpi-visual/src/scene/magnify.py. Both retain source/tool-derived identity, deterministic processing and refusal to reuse altered same-key artifacts. The epistemic record's limits on scene correctness, hidden geometry and durable source locking remain findings about this artifact. RT-RTE-visual-inspection is the wrapper/tool delivery route, not another declaration of that artifact.

Valid containers and distinct operative parts

No receipt-container supersession is required. MEM-OBJ-validated-receipt describes the complete ValidatedReceipt and its delivered rendering, including quotes, labels, uncertainty and metadata. EPI-OBJ-validated-receipt isolates quotations and source/status metadata; EPI-OBJ-receipt-labels isolates kind and uncertainty judgments. Their different check domains justify retaining the valid container alongside its declared parts: string membership and host-status agreement do not check semantic appropriateness of labels. Both epistemic records declare containment in RT-RTE-reducer-receipt, the enclosing admission route. The narrower quotations record is not an identity with the whole memory container. Its title alone does not make it one.

MEM-OBJ-archive-object, MEM-OBJ-validated-receipt and MEM-OBJ-reducer-journal remain distinct. They are respectively raw selected log, derived foreground evidence selection and provenance/accounting entries. Their shared association with RT-RTE-reducer-receipt does not establish object identity. The journal's later Skill accounting consumer connects it to MEM-OBJ-run-result and RT-RTE-skill-handoff, not to automatic diagnostic replay.

MEM-OBJ-progress-summary remains a task-content part of RT-OBJ-online-state, not its replacement. The state also contains plan structure and code-consumed estimates. Neither record is identical to Pi's native summary/recent tail delivered through RT-RTE-online-compaction. The reports agree that persistence and parsing of pendingProgress do not establish a dedicated prompt read-back channel. Original tool messages may be selected by the external native summarizer; that possibility does not turn the persisted array into an independently wired checkpoint.

The claims also remain distinct. RT-CLM-fusion-roundtrip concerns direct sequencing with then_run. EPI-CLM-preserve-evidence is a cross-mechanism README preservation claim. EPI-CLM-lossless-reducer is the reducer prompt's narrower lossless label. Overlapping preservation language is not identity. The reducer's instruction channel, RT-BAP-reducer-instructions, is likewise not identical to the receipt it helps produce: producer guidance and foreground evidence have different consumers and authority.

Independent convergence and integration dispositions

Archive exactness and evidence sufficiency. RT-RTE-observation-replay scopes exact readback to surviving intact files and pointers. MEM-OBJ-observation adds that individual recall pages do not revalidate the whole content hash. EPI-OBJ-observation-text separates identity and assembled-text preservation from truth of tool assertions. These are compatible restrictions at different points, not competing integrity guarantees. They do not establish tamper-proof recall or automatic use of omitted evidence.

Reducer admission is narrower than diagnosis. RT-RTE-reducer-receipt, MEM-OBJ-validated-receipt, EPI-OBJ-validated-receipt and EPI-OBJ-receipt-labels converge on exact selected quotations, host-status agreement and size-based operational admission, without completeness or causal-diagnosis checking. The epistemic ledger's evidence-consuming acceptance is acceptance for smaller evidence transport, not a stronger task-correctness finding than the runtime or memory account. Raw archive retention can precede failed receipt admission. Archive/journal exceptions outside the ordinary provider fallback remain limits in all relevant accounts; the README claim is not promoted into a universal fallback guarantee.

Visual helper inspection extends the wrapper account. RT-RTE-visual-inspection explicitly leaves Python cache internals uninspected. MEM-OBJ-magnify-artifact and EPI-OBJ-crop-artifact supply direct helper findings and matching integrity/reuse passages. This disposes the memory report's cache integration issue as additional evidence, not correction of a contrary runtime assertion. It does not change the runtime's operation status or establish visual grading. RT-BAP-visual-policy remains static model guidance rather than enforced locality or an outcome-revised policy.

Control adaptation and task verification remain separate. The memory annotation on RT-OBJ-online-state identifies retained trace-derived estimates consumed by later compaction decisions. The epistemic ledger on RT-RTE-online-compaction assesses policy checks and the opaque native-summary transformation separately. Neither contradicts the other: code-consumed adaptation does not establish summary fidelity, true completion, improved capacity or evidence-responsive revision of shipped theories. The pending-progress integration issue is resolved by retaining the distinct part/container/summary paths, not by merging their authority.

Delegation has a narrow conversational return, not isolated effects. RT-RTE-skill-handoff, MEM-OBJ-context-export, MEM-OBJ-run-result, EPI-OBJ-exported-context and the workflow annotation agree that a separate child context shares workspace effects. The workflow adds connected Codex dispatch, polling, timeout and notification detail to the existing route. Its distinction between wait's polling deadline and execution timeout does not conflict with the runtime's process-termination account. Process done, result-file persistence and host JSON emission do not certify product correctness or observed host delivery. Parent review is requested after effects, not an enforced pre-change gate. Codex export's error-label degradation adds a specific source-trust limit without contradicting the other reports' lossy-reference characterization.

Conflict disposition and remaining limits

No unresolved cross-report disagreement is established by these pinned members. The memory report's proposed integrations are accounted for above: Visual helper inspection, progress/state separation, scoped exactness and journal accounting. Its remaining inspection limits agree with the epistemic and workflow boundaries rather than requiring record-value selection. No supplied dependent finding requires a cited record to retain a superseded contrary assertion. No required missing part is identified by these connections.

The reports retain separate limits on external native summarization, model/provider internals, actual configuration grants, host consumption and execution/causal outcomes. These prevent stronger conclusions but are not conflicts or evidenced absences. This reconciliation uses the supplied records and their retained passages only; no frozen-source ambiguity required an additional source read.