SoL-Pi memory profile

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-memory-profile.md

Comparison rationale

The profile classifies retained memory, not every storage or permission surface of the runtime. Exact archives, context replacements, code-consumed control estimates, delegated transcript/result artifacts and reused crops have distinct consumers. General configuration and static Visual/reducer instructions are not accumulated memory. Opaque external model weights are not assumed to change through use merely because a provider is called. The boundary of those components remains described by RT-CMP-frontier-model and RT-CMP-reducer-model.

Reconciliation supersedes the epistemic observation, exported-context and crop object declarations with MEM-OBJ-observation, MEM-OBJ-context-export and MEM-OBJ-magnify-artifact. Profile citations use those canonical objects. Their retained qualifications remain in force: assembled text is not authenticated truth, export can degrade provenance, and crop identity does not establish scene correctness. The receipt container and its quotation/label parts remain distinct, as do MEM-OBJ-progress-summary, RT-OBJ-online-state and the native replacement context in RT-RTE-online-compaction. No supersession creates a stronger evidence basis.

Trace learning here means an automatic trace-fed durable update with a later consumer. It does not require a new proposition, learned parameters or demonstrated improvement. Receipt selection, exported prefixes, result aggregation, native continuation summaries and trace-derived OCC estimates meet that route definition. Input learning authority and downstream knowledge/routing authority remain separate findings. Raw observation storage alone does not establish another qualifying update, nor does a transient display projection prove a durable generated artifact. No local or system-wide trace-learning negative is manufactured from missing evidence (RT-RTE-reducer-receipt, RT-RTE-skill-handoff, RT-OBJ-online-state, MEM-OBJ-observation).

The native-summary chain has wired request, commit/continuation and later-consumption interfaces. Its opaque implementation prevents complete curation, selection, persistence and provenance coverage; it does not erase the supported chain. Consolidation at the native generator is kept at afforded basis. Preservation instructions do not establish faithful summarization, and receipt label uncertainty does not justify asserting synthesis (RT-RTE-online-compaction, EPI-OBJ-receipt-labels).

Requests and unsolicited supply are operations within a chain, not competing labels for an entire feature. Observation recall and a requested crop/result return are pull; automatic context projection and correlated completion notification are push. A requested id is not an identifier-based push witness. OCC custom-type matching and Skill run-id correlation do actually select retained parts on automatic supply routes. Coarse eligibility and budget filtering remain separate from those matches and from the reducer's model judgment (RT-RTE-observation-replay, RT-RTE-skill-handoff, RT-RTE-online-compaction, MEM-OBJ-magnify-artifact).

All axes retain their included unresolved branches. File paths do not settle every host persistence substrate; sampled image data is not classified as model weights; generic callers do not prove human content admission. No additional source read was performed: the profile uses the supplied accepted records, annotations and reconciliation only. Evidence is implementation or afforded contract, not an observed run, measured benefit or causal experiment.