IsaacCLupus_mnemosyn_spec reconciliation

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

Boundary and duplicate supersessions

The reports share the frozen boundary and Source register: a complete specification artifact with a partial implemented loop. Doctrine about the unified OS, static legacy adapter behavior and unobserved operation remain separate. No source reads were needed for this reconciliation; the cited declarations supply the evidence passages.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-unified-pages is superseded by MEM-OBJ-unified-vault. Both identify the same retained Markdown files produced by legacy publication, with preserved bodies and replacement frontmatter, in SRC-1, prior-art/v0-glue/jarvis_kb/vault_sync.py. The epistemic declaration's quoted metadata replacement and write identify the memory declaration's object, not a separate output. This connects the epistemic inventory and maturity-mapping lineage to the memory account's retained object. Both declarations remain; neither one's findings are replaced. Neither object is identical to RT-RTE-vault-publish, the producing route.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-user-profiles is superseded by MEM-OBJ-user-profiles. Both identify the Phase 2 user_profiles facts and conversation provenance proposed by SRC-1, SPECIFICATION.md. The epistemic declaration's extracted-facts passage and the memory declaration's field inventory identify one table, not two kinds of memory. The epistemic inventory and promotion route therefore concern the memory member's same proposed object. The epistemic account's lack of a working verification algorithm and the memory account's unresolved visibility remain intact.

Amendment: EPI-RTE-profile-promotion is superseded by MEM-RTE-conversation-promotion. Both trace the same conversation log → fast-model facts/proposals → heat and daily decay → inbox → human commitment / cold archive route. Each quotes that sequence from SRC-1, MNEMOSYNE_SPEC_v0.2.md. The epistemic ledger separates transformation, relevance selection and disposition functions of that route; those rows do not establish additional routes. Its indeterminate semantic relation, relevance-versus-truth distinction and absent factual criterion coexist with the memory route's claimed design and uninspected operation. This supersession connects those assessments without changing their statuses or inferring direct profile delivery.

Containers, parts and distinct routes

The workflow account and annotation deliberately reuse the runtime lifecycle and declare no new records. Its file handoffs, rejection and delivery account extend that route rather than superseding it. No further identity between declared records is established by the supplied reports.

Independent convergence and integration dispositions

The runtime, memory and epistemic accounts independently inspect the legacy copier and gateway and converge on several bounded findings. RT-RTE-vault-publish, MEM-OBJ-unified-vault and EPI-RTE-maturity-mapping agree that copying preserves bodies, discards governance keys and gives numeric confidence precedence over contradicted status. RT-RTE-client-query and its memory annotation agree that echoed budgets and source labels are not bridge enforcement. RT-RTE-foundry-tools and EPI-RTE-audit-dispatch agree that backend audit reporting does not itself gate publication. These are convergent readings of the same SRC-1 implementation, not independent execution evidence.

The memory integration issues require no runtime correction. Graph schema/assembler mismatches and unrestricted positive-depth BFS remain local limits of MEM-RTE-graph-context. The workflow's later-query account describes the guide's proposed hybrid search and trimming, not proof that this study or the legacy gateway implements them. These findings do not disagree.

Likewise, MEM-RTE-feedback-recompile supplies selected watcher rules and a proposed writer consumer but retains incompatible DDL references and incomplete plumbing. The workflow's recovery account leaves automatic contradiction resolution and full retry ownership unresolved in its inspected texts. A scheduler sketch does not settle every new-attempt trigger or stopping rule. Neither report licenses executable retries or improved capacity. Both preserve the independent theory-condition limits of RT-RTE-design-lifecycle.

Remaining memory issues stay limitations rather than conflicts: direct profile visibility is undecided; pack completeness and withdrawal are not guaranteed; external Link admission and LLM-WIKI history remain opaque; optional vector and cache behavior is unresolved. The epistemic account's bounded conclusion preserves these distinctions and does not turn heat, hashes, integrity proofs or operational exposure into factual acceptance. EPI-CLM-audit-quality concerns proposed quality checks, not the separate atomicity or write-guard claims.

No unresolved cross-report disagreement is established by these pinned members. No correction answers or declined objections were supplied. Shared uncertainty about external contracts, activation, factual warrant, learning and benefit therefore remains uncertainty, not a conflict to settle or a stronger status to select.