Wuphf profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

The handed memory profile supports publication as a partial comparison inventory. I checked all ten axes, their positive findings and local assessments, the natural classification units, and their support in the handed runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow members. Reconciliation's six supersessions were applied as identity resolutions, not evidence upgrades. The profile uses the canonical memory records for those referents. The narrower epistemic knowledge-packet operation does not replace the memory member's two-branch task selector.

  • Storage substrate: File, repository and live-map/index findings follow the retained objects in MEM-OBJ-private-memory-note, MEM-OBJ-learning-record, MEM-OBJ-typed-fact, EPI-OBJ-entity-brief, RT-OBJ-stored-tool and MEM-OBJ-session-transcript. Cache files do not establish a vector database. Remote storage and separate durable recovery remain unresolved rather than inheriting local witnesses. Grouped file/repository objects share the emitted classifications; the axis does not claim a complete object census.
  • Representational form: The profile separates interpreted text, fixed-rule metadata/code and dense numerical representations. MEM-CMP-retrieval-embedding supports parametric form for dense vectors, independently of JSON serialization. RT-BAP-tool-execution supports symbolic execution. Readable session projections do not classify opaque native entries; MEM-OBJ-session-memory-snapshot does not establish a retained continuation checkpoint.
  • Lineage: Explicit caller authorship, private-to-shared copying, task-derived capture and compiled transformations are distinguished by derivation path. MEM-RTE-scoped-notes, MEM-RTE-task-distillation, MEM-RTE-artifact-extraction and EPI-RTE-playbook-compile support those findings. Known subsequent transformations do not resolve initial corpus or provider provenance. Smoke-directed repair has trace input separately from initial code authorship.
  • Behavioral authority: Knowledge at the office reader, ranking at retrieval, routing at input/operation selection, learning at update consumers and validation/enforcement at retained admission controls have identifiable consumers and effects. MEM-BAP-knowledge-guidance does not grant notes operator-instruction force. MEM-RTE-task-distillation supports distinct learning, pass-gate and TaskID-dedup effects. MEM-RTE-skill-registration supports tombstone vetoes. EPI-RTE-lint-judge and EPI-RTE-lint-disposal support acknowledgment-based checking suppression, not universal fact withdrawal. Compiled procedural instruction remains afforded, not upgraded to wired invocation.
  • Write agency: Software admission is not confused with authorship or workflow initiation. The automatic findings follow the note, learning, extraction, maintenance, registration and saved-tool routes. The manual finding is narrowly the existing human-edited body recognized and preserved by MEM-RTE-brief-synthesis, not human approval of generated additions. Generic contradiction callers, rejection authorship and opaque replacement mechanisms remain unresolved.
  • Curation operations: Consolidation follows clipped task capture, fact extraction and article reduction; evolution follows replacement/rewriting; dedup follows current-record and skill handling; promotion follows increased shared availability; decay follows confidence aging and active-tier removal. MEM-RTE-learning-admission, MEM-RTE-wiki-maintenance and EPI-RTE-lint-disposal support the bounded lifecycle findings. Model use and the name synthesis do not establish new propositions absent from inputs. The profile preserves that uncertainty without erasing implemented consolidation.
  • Read-back direction: Requested queries/reads and unsolicited model packets are distinguished within their chains. MEM-RTE-memory-brief, MEM-RTE-task-knowledge and MEM-RTE-upstream-results support push; backend queries inside that delivery do not convert the recipient into a requester. Manual saved calls differ from routine automatic matching. The workflow annotation supports requested transcript/artifact presentation, not conversational reuse or observed receipt.
  • Read-back signal: Local lexical, dense, identity and coarse findings name actual selection operations and delivered parts. Dependency IDs in MEM-RTE-upstream-results select retained outcomes; callable-name matching in RT-RTE-scheduled-tool selects executable code. These are not identifiers merely attached to requested files. Remote ranking remains unresolved. Inapplicability is limited to named requested operations, not asserted for the mixed or unresolved boundary.
  • Trace learning: Both completed-task capture and smoke-feedback-directed durable repair meet the profile definition: automatic trace input, retained behavior-shaping output and a later consumer. RT-RTE-tool-authoring, RT-OBJ-stored-tool and RT-BAP-tool-execution establish the conditional repair/persistence/execution chain. Conditional activation and simulation do not negate wiring. This does not contradict the reports' withholding of improved-capacity or exercised-learning conclusions. Raw routine transcripts alone establish no such update.
  • Trace source: EPI-RTE-task-check and MEM-RTE-task-distillation support execution-feedback provenance. Recorded task completion/activity supports the separately scoped event-stream finding; the profile expressly leaves copied narrative origin unresolved. Smoke execution errors support tool-traces. Neither session-logs nor trajectories is inferred from retaining outcome messages or task records alone.

All axes remain partial with positive witnesses and named unresolved alternatives. No axis asserts absence, complete enumeration, observation or causal benefit. Local known assessments classify their named paths rather than opaque alternatives. Differences between requested behavior, implemented checks and actual outcomes remain consequential but are already expressed in the profile's findings and uncertainty. No unsupported emitted comparison value or materially misleading coverage claim was established. No source files were read and no new evidence, quotations or records were introduced.

Blockers

none

Limits

none