CQ profile verification
Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md
Verification
Checked all ten axes in the memory profile, including each unit's scope, coverage assessment, positive value and evidence basis. Classification used the handed records and annotations only. No source reads or new quotations were needed. No refusal or substantive profile answers were supplied.
The profile follows memory accumulated through use rather than the entire runtime's configuration. Static installed instructions, external model weights, transient query vectors and unretained reflection intermediates remain excluded. Retained knowledge vectors are not confused with their external producer: MEM-OBJ-knowledge-vectors. The supplied reconciliation resolves the duplicate insight identity to MEM-OBJ-insight; the combined EPI-OBJ-evidence remains an overlapping container rather than a substitute for every metadata or flag part.
| Axis | Judgment |
|---|---|
| Storage substrate | SQLite payloads, indexes and vectors, PostgreSQL records, dictionary-backed knowledge, failure files and disk/memo discovery caches support the emitted values. Alternative-store mutation coverage and injected-store substrate remain unresolved rather than being upgraded by the SQLite witness. See MEM-OBJ-insight, MEM-OBJ-node-info, RT-OBJ-failure-record and the memory annotation on RT-RTE-knowledge-query. |
| Representational form | Prose interpretation, fixed metadata rules and numerical distance selection have separate findings. Arbitrary extension semantics are not inferred from JSON encoding. Optional criticism retains partial coverage. See MEM-OBJ-flags, MEM-OBJ-extensions and MEM-OBJ-knowledge-vectors. |
| Lineage | Ordinary authorship, afforded session extraction, transfer/import and subsequent code-derived metadata/vector/cache paths remain distinct from unknown initialized content. Known later transformations do not authenticate initial provenance. See MEM-OBJ-selection-metadata, RT-RTE-session-reflection and the memory annotation on RT-RTE-local-drain. |
| Behavioral authority | Host and reviewer knowledge, text/metadata/vector ranking, status enforcement and validation, tier/ID routing and endpoint routing are supported at their named consumers. Requested reflection supplies an afforded experience-to-advice update, not observed improvement. Imperative lesson text is not upgraded to standing instruction. See RT-BAP-knowledge-guidance, RT-RTE-remote-review, RT-RTE-knowledge-query and MEM-RTE-discovery-resolution. |
| Write agency | Interactive per-content human choice is manual and afforded; headless admission is automatic and afforded. Software maintenance, transfer, hook/cache writes and seed review support automatic wiring. Generic proposal, replacement and JWT caller identity remain unresolved. Starting migration does not make every field transformation manual. See RT-CLM-proposal-approval, MEM-RTE-store-replacement, MEM-RTE-maintenance-migration and RT-RTE-remote-review. |
| Curation operations | Replacement capability supports afforded evolve; successful score changes support promote/decay; rejection supports retained-content invalidation; deletion and auxiliary expiry support forgetting. Requested reflection operations are not emitted as implemented curation. Failed server/Python duplicate flags establish no deduplication or retained update. See RT-RTE-knowledge-feedback, EPI-RTE-store-deletion, RT-RTE-remote-review and RT-RTE-failure-reminder. |
| Read-back direction | Requested knowledge/review/feedback reads are pull. Cursor stop supplies retained failure context automatically. Resolver cache selection supplies NodeInfo internally to transport, separately from the requested knowledge return. See RT-RTE-knowledge-query, RT-RTE-failure-reminder and MEM-RTE-discovery-resolution. |
| Read-back signal | Conversation and address matches select actual delivered retained payloads on the two push operations. TTL, availability and clipping are not extra semantic signals. Pull-only units are locally inapplicable; opaque additional delivery remains unresolved. See RT-OBJ-failure-record and MEM-OBJ-node-info. |
| Trace learning | The automatic failure-event-to-clipped-record-to-later-stop chain supports wired yes under the profile's definition. Diagnosis, generalized knowledge and demonstrated benefit are not extra requirements. Interactive approval and unspecified headless/feedback inputs are not upgraded by that witness. See RT-RTE-failure-reminder, RT-RTE-session-reflection and RT-RTE-knowledge-feedback. |
| Trace source | The qualifying Cursor write consumes tool input/error feedback through a discrete failure-hook callback, supporting tool-traces and event-streams under the supplied definitions. Requested session sources are not aggregated into positive findings without a qualifying automatic update. See RT-OBJ-failure-record and RT-RTE-failure-reminder. |
Several units group related parts or mechanisms, but their findings retain the relevant consumer, transformation and local warrant. These coarse units do not establish mechanism counts or complete part-addressed comparisons. Every axis remains partial; opaque alternatives and initialized-state gaps are explicitly retained. No emitted absence, system-wide negative or observed/causal finding is asserted. Missing host execution evidence appropriately bounds exercised behavior and benefit without erasing architectural wiring.
The reconciliation's duplicate-feedback, semantic-ranking, reflection-doctrine and transfer qualifications survive classification. The remaining missing criticism-part declaration is a publishable inventory limitation below, not grounds to suppress supported prose or knowledge findings. None of the examined issues undermines a central conclusion or requires withdrawal of an emitted comparison value.
Blockers
none
Limits
- The optional Go-local prose criticism lacks an independent operative-part declaration in MEM-OBJ-flags and the overlapping EPI-OBJ-evidence. The memory profile already marks its form and authority units partial. Local prose delivery and knowledge authority remain supported, but readers should withhold complete part-addressed criticism inventories and comparisons of its independent admission, consumption and lifecycle paths. The container evidence does not establish that criticism is absent or that score arithmetic evaluates its argument.