Citadel memory profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes of the memory profile against the handed records, including their annotations and the supplied reconciliation. The answers input was empty. No source inspection was needed, and no new evidence or replacement classification was introduced. The judgment concerns supported architectural comparison findings, not deployed configuration, exercised use or benefit.

Scope and coverage. The profile includes accumulated source and control objects, derived session artifacts and their later consumers. It excludes static deployment prompts and model weights without excluding the retained embedding projections. All axes remain partial. Opaque provider successors, supplied-text provenance and incompletely inspected capture, connector and recovery alternatives remain included uncertainties rather than being silently removed to claim complete coverage. The broad unresolved units restrict inventory comparisons; they do not claim absence. The basis of each positive remains wired rather than observed.

Storage and form. SQLite is supported for source revisions, projection state and feedback; JSON files are supported for vault/conflict history and saved evaluation controls. Vector, graph and relational projection findings describe implemented backend paths rather than asserting a particular production configuration. The profile separates prose consumption, fixed-rule metadata and dense embedding representations. A readable graph description is not used to classify the opaque provider successor. See MEM-OBJ-source-revisions, MEM-OBJ-projection-receipts, MEM-OBJ-feedback-events, MEM-OBJ-obsidian-revisions, MEM-OBJ-search-projections, EPI-OBJ-conflict-record, EPI-OBJ-benchmark-run and EPI-OBJ-evaluation-gate.

Lineage and authority. Transcript extraction, external import and compiled derivatives have distinct warrants. Known downstream derivation does not settle initial authorship or opaque provenance. Retained prose supplies knowledge at host/document readers; retained text and embeddings influence retrieval ranking; heads and receipts supply eligibility criteria and enforcement; jobs and event state route maintenance work. Recorded experience also supplies learning authority at the automatic summary-producing consumer, separately from the resulting note's knowledge authority. These findings do not assert standing instruction authority or improved capacity. See MEM-OBJ-node-note, MEM-OBJ-session-trace, MEM-OBJ-optimization-note, MEM-BAP-current-head, MEM-RTE-feedback-processing and EPI-RTE-automation-receipt.

Write agency and curation. Automatic SessionEnd capture, projection, known-work promotion, event processing, optimization-note admission and enabled direct-learning chunk adoption do not require a per-content human decision. Generic callers and pending-review credentials do not establish manual agency. The workflow annotation on RT-RTE-promotion-review preserves the distinction between a browser approval opportunity and an actual human decision. Consolidation is supported by bounded transcript extraction; promotion by shared-tier admission; evolution and invalidation by revision replacement and tombstones; local decay by warning pruning. These are separate implemented transformations. Generated enrichment/optimization semantics and opaque improve are not assigned synthesis merely because they produce summaries. See RT-RTE-session-capture, RT-RTE-source-projection, RT-RTE-index-curation, MEM-RTE-source-enrichment, MEM-RTE-vault-sync, EPI-RTE-source-withdrawal and EPI-RTE-conflict-record.

Read-back direction and signal. Explicit search, drilldown and vault requests support pull. The task hook's automatic host-context supply supports push independently of its HTTP request step. Scheduled selection of recent labels/tags supplies another push operation. Query-based lexical/vector selection and coarse scope/budget controls have separate findings; requested document IDs are not mislabeled identifier-based push. The maintenance unit groups request and supply steps, but its finding notes distinguish them sufficiently to support the emitted values. Incomplete promotion/provider selectors prevent complete signal coverage. See RT-RTE-task-search, RT-BAP-context-delivery, MEM-RTE-document-drilldown and RT-RTE-index-curation.

Trace learning and source. Automatic personal-note and transcript-derived shared-artifact writes retain experience for later search/document consumers. They support wired yes without weight training, new factual warrant or demonstrated improvement. Session turns and recorded tool requests/results support session-logs and tool-traces respectively. Neither serialization nor an error description establishes event-stream or trajectory learning. Supplied-data sharing and opaque improvement alternatives remain unresolved; no unsupported local or system-wide no is emitted. See RT-RTE-session-capture, MEM-RTE-share-session, MEM-OBJ-node-note, MEM-OBJ-session-trace and EPI-RTE-note-distill.

The profile uses the reconciled memory-declared node-note object and enrichment route, while preserving the distinct extraction part and enriched output. The failed-tool fidelity countercase does not negate consolidation or a durable trace-fed route. Historical drilldown does not negate bounded current-search invalidation. Additive optimization-note admission does not establish editing the original source or resolve upstream improve. I found no unsupported emitted value, unjustified complete assessment or material scope contradiction. The explicitly represented uncertainties require no additional verification limit.

Blockers

none

Limits

none