MGI-Mind reconciliation

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

Basis and current disagreement disposition

The reports share the frozen boundary and Source register. This reconciliation uses the supplied current members and their retained passages. No additional source reads were needed. No analyst correction answers or declined objections were supplied. Connections below concern record identity and dependencies, not adjudication of support or selection of a stronger conclusion status.

The earlier temporal-filtering disagreement is no longer present in the current reports. RT-RTE-context-briefing now explicitly describes the missing valid_from check, the valid_until upper-bound check, and selection of at most 20 valid/default-visible candidates before that check. It retains SRC-1 src/cli.rs's fact_valid_at(None, valid_until.as_deref(), &now) passage and src/knowledge.rs's storage of caller-supplied valid_from. These findings agree with the memory annotation and MEM-OBJ-fact-state. Memory's Integration issues still asks to correct the former broad wording, but that request no longer describes the supplied runtime finding. The epistemic ledger delegates briefing selection details to the runtime record; that dependency no longer requires an unsupported full-interval guarantee. No current inter-report disagreement was identified. Complete temporal validity remains unestablished for this consumer, as all these positions now allow.

Duplicate identities

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-memories is superseded by MEM-OBJ-memory. Both refer to caller memory text stored as Qdrant payload chunks and later returned by search. Their SRC-1 src/storage.rs and src/ingest.rs passages locate the same content. Unknown source warrant remains an epistemic finding; this identity does not turn storage or retrieval into truth acceptance. MEM-OBJ-memory-vectors instead identifies the dense and lexical selection encodings and is not another declaration of the prose object.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-facts is superseded by MEM-OBJ-fact. Both identify subject/predicate/object assertions in vectorless Qdrant fact points. The former's SRC-1 src/knowledge.rs payload-insertion passage and the latter's vectorless-point passage identify the same triples. Fixed-rule matching of symbolic fields and host interpretation of natural-language assertions describe different consumers of that object, not different objects. The related MEM-OBJ-fact-state separately assesses lifecycle and cardinality state. The supersession neither discards those fields nor equates operational standing with truth warrant.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-procedures is superseded by MEM-OBJ-procedure. Both identify procedure-typed error/context/fix payloads, normalized-error identity and retrieval vectors in the memories collection. Their SRC-1 src/storage.rs and src/procedure.rs evidence locates the same retained playbooks. The memory account of returned provenance and the epistemic limits on explanation and transfer remain compatible findings about that referent.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-skills is superseded by MEM-OBJ-skill. Both identify stable-name trigger/body playbooks stored in Qdrant and consumed by catalogue, match or show. Their shared reference to RT-RTE-skill-admission and SRC-1 src/skill.rs/src/storage.rs passages establish the same content endpoint. Both leave actual body-level theoretical content unresolved. Identity establishes neither criticism nor host compliance.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-procstats is superseded by MEM-OBJ-procstats. Both identify the separate derived procedure/skill counters, last-use timestamp and verified latch. They retain the same SRC-1 src/storage.rs latch passage. Their shared consequence is ranking authority, not independent test authentication or a current correctness certificate.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-external-signals is superseded by MEM-OBJ-external-signals. Both identify typed success/source/timestamp reports serialized into external_signals_v15 in the memories collection. The identical SRC-1 src/storage.rs write passage establishes this identity. Neither declaration identifies a fact-local signal store or authenticates the reported event.

These supersessions preserve both declarations and every analyst's findings. They identify duplicate referents without replacing record values.

Parts, containers and overlaps without identity

EPI-OBJ-provenance identifies citation-bearing memory text with an additional admission surface, not the entire MEM-OBJ-memory class. EPI-RTE-provenance-import owns validation/formatting and the ordinary-storage handoff. The memory object already allows external snippets; it does not thereby become identical to this narrower part or its admission route. The SRC-1 src/provenance.rs envelope passage supports the distinction. The generic container remains valid; no split supersession is needed.

EPI-OBJ-session-summary is the caller summary within MEM-OBJ-session, which also contains lifecycle header/footer and timestamped file state. Memory's SRC-1 src/session.rs footer passage identifies the summary's placement. These are not interchangeable referents. The file remains a valid container; neither declaration needs supersession. Both depend on RT-RTE-context-briefing for later delivery rather than semantic endorsement.

WF-RTE-response-delivery explicitly declares a part of RT-RTE-assistant-memory. Its SRC-1 clients/python/mgimind/_client.py passages describe response checks and rendering of hit content with optional author, omitting structured identifiers and scores. Runtime's text-return account remains valid; the workflow specifies the narrower consumer-visible handoff. This is not a second end-to-end memory route. Likewise, EPI-RTE-extraction-parser explicitly declares a structural-check part of RT-RTE-auto-extraction. Parsing permits fact-writer input but licenses neither semantic entailment nor truth. The parent routes remain valid alongside these parts.

EPI-RTE-text-selection and MEM-RTE-transcript-harvest overlap on transcript filtering, but neither whole route replaces the other. The epistemic route also covers raw-marker and personal-fact heuristics in SRC-1 src/ingest.rs; the memory route traces file-level parsing/reporting and the transcript-to-ingest handoff. Both retain SRC-1 src/session_ingest.rs's discarded source-tag evidence. Role prefixes survive, whereas session-specific source metadata does not. Both are upstream of RT-RTE-ingest-admission, not duplicates of its admission policy. Their accounts remain valid without a split supersession.

MEM-RTE-fact-lifecycle spans fact admission, withdrawal and later visibility. EPI-RTE-fact-comparison, EPI-RTE-fact-disposition, EPI-RTE-fact-withdrawal and EPI-RTE-fact-consumption separately assess evaluator, store mutation, explicit withdrawal and query functions. None is identical to the whole lifecycle route, and separating those functions does not make the combined account wrong. No split supersession is warranted. They connect an optional producer, RT-RTE-auto-extraction, to storage and consumers without implying that all facts were model-extracted. Direct fact query remains distinct from briefing selection.

MEM-RTE-fact-retest covers both query-time context drift and background retest. EPI-RTE-drift-evaluation and EPI-RTE-confidence-retest separate those functions, thresholds and consumers. These are overlapping whole/part accounts, not replaceable duplicates. The combined route remains valid with its mode, context and namespace limits; the separated findings do not justify strengthening its status or universalizing ranking effects.

MEM-RTE-outcome-ranking spans reported outcomes, the typed procedure bridge, derived counters and later ranking. EPI-RTE-outcome-recording separates log acquisition/retention, while EPI-RTE-outcome-trust assesses ranking adaptation. Neither is identical to the whole chain; all remain valid without split supersession. They are distinct from RT-RTE-skill-admission, which replaces instruction bodies rather than updating derived reliance.

MEM-RTE-pinned-blocks admits content consumed by RT-RTE-context-briefing; the write and aggregate read are not identical. MEM-RTE-unified-recall queries multiple silos and is distinct from note-only RT-RTE-assistant-memory. Its HTTP alternatives remain bounded by RT-RTE-scoped-http. MEM-RTE-portable-export generates text for a separate afforded host-file consumption channel, not another name for recall or automatic installation. EPI-RTE-search-advice recommends whether to search; it is not a search operation or an enforcing host gate.

MEM-BAP-store-selection acts through server filtering/ranking, whereas RT-BAP-host-recall acts through host interpretation of returned note text. MEM-BAP-playbook-guidance covers instruction-content and export consumers. Their channels, force and scope differ; no authority-path supersession is warranted. Memory's quarantine, access, origin-context, audit and vault objects have no replaceable counterpart in the other members. Ordinary note quarantine and fact quarantine-candidate status are distinct mechanisms, not duplicate declarations.

Integration dispositions and independent convergence

Admission and quarantine. RT-RTE-ingest-admission, its memory annotations and the epistemic ledger agree that direct add bypasses ingest's additional policies and that admission is not proposition-truth acceptance. Memory distinguishes repeated cheap-gate rejection/promotion from near-duplicate quarantine, and retains the historical reason after promotion. These details qualify different branches rather than contradict runtime's recoverable-quarantine account. Neither ordinary quarantine promotion nor the fact lifecycle supplies a universal rejection/recovery rule.

Fact typed-signal continuity. MEM-RTE-fact-retest, EPI-RTE-outcome-recording and EPI-RTE-confidence-retest independently identify the memories-versus-facts namespace discontinuity. EPI-CLM-outcome-duel further compares the tool-description claim with fact-add inputs and the retest reader. This is a source-claim/implementation mismatch, not disagreement between reports. The fact-wide typed-evidence feed remains unestablished without another supported bridge. The procedure bridge and scalar fact retest retain their separate findings.

Verification and trace-derived authority. MEM-OBJ-procstats, MEM-RTE-outcome-ranking, EPI-RTE-outcome-recording and EPI-RTE-outcome-trust converge on caller-supplied signals, latched verification and same-key log replacement without a new counter bump. EPI-CLM-procedure-signal supplies the stronger source-native aspiration of deterministic verification. The reports retain implemented ranking adaptation without treating it as authenticated testing, semantic criticism, improved capacity or exercised self-improvement. Actual skill-body content and criticism remain unresolved independently of the supported state-update path.

Evaluators. MEM-CLM-benchmark-isolation concerns the mismatch between temporary-library cleanup and actual _procedures writes. EPI-RTE-benchmark-evaluation concerns evaluator computation and its oracle domains, including direct storage recall rather than trust-ranked procedure recall, constructed policy baselines and empty frozen STALE aggregation. These are complementary claim/route records, not duplicates or conflicting accounts. The isolation limitation does not erase the existence of a retrieval metric; the metric does not establish clean-room isolation, fix execution, assistant-answer correctness or causal benefit. No report adopts raw benchmark scores as observed efficacy.

Confinement and extraction. RT-RTE-scoped-http describes request-shape controls and scoped text-recall rejection; RT-RTE-auto-extraction describes the conditional global-write exception through accepted-memory enqueue. No other report supplies a contrary universal confinement guarantee. Default-off compilation, installed extractor, candidate admission and unobserved generated triples remain activation/evidence conditions, not grounds to erase inspected reachability. Structural parsing in the epistemic part record does not resolve semantic quality or confinement.

Delivery and remaining limits. The workflow account conditionally connects two shipped Runner requests through memory tools and printed final output. It agrees with RT-CLM-recall-habit and EPI-RTE-search-advice: instructions and tool availability do not force recall or answer correctness. The response-delivery part narrows visible material without asserting successful model reliance. Briefing, catalogue reload and export do not establish host compaction, an isolated assistant frame, installed instruction priority or compliance. Memory's unresolved migration/backfill, restore/reassembly, full historical-query semantics, retest prioritization and raw-result surfaces remain local coverage limits. Alongside host/provider and execution-evidence limits, they prevent exhaustive safety, temporal-equivalence and efficacy conclusions. They are not inter-report disagreements or evidenced absences.