LLM Repo Wiki profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes of the memory profile, including their scope, natural units, coverage assessments, finding bases and support in the accepted records. I resolved the lint supersession to MEM-RTE-lint-wiki. The other overlapping containers retain distinct referents and do not require substituting records. No source reads, new quotations or replacement records were needed.

Storage and representational form separate database retention, dense retrieval structures and diagnostic/export files. Mixed text, symbolic fields and numerical vectors are classified at their respective consumption paths rather than by serialization alone. The records support the emitted database, vector, files, natural-language, symbolic and parametric findings: MEM-OBJ-chunks, MEM-OBJ-wiki-chunks, MEM-OBJ-eval-results and RT-RTE-external-consumption. The architectural inventory does not purport to describe a supplied live database. Static shipped guidance and external provider/host memory remain outside its scope.

Lineage distinguishes import, authorship, compilation and trace extraction without resolving unknown initial content or provider provenance from subsequent transformations. Its partial assessment preserves those uncertainties: MEM-OBJ-project-context, MEM-OBJ-page-revisions, MEM-OBJ-chunks and MEM-OBJ-chat-summary.

Behavioral authority identifies actual consumers and effects: delivered knowledge, owner directions, retained ranking inputs, routing state, admissibility criteria and vetoes, and trace material feeding the summary update. Learning authority at that update consumer is separate from summary knowledge/instruction authority at later chat. Neither instruction placement nor delivery is treated as demonstrated compliance or improved capacity. These mappings are supported by MEM-RTE-search-knowledge, MEM-BAP-project-brief, MEM-BAP-summary-context, RT-RTE-revision-admission, EPI-OBJ-source-citations and RT-RTE-context-fold.

I rechecked the earlier message-admission objection against the revised profile, not just its author's answer. Write agency now separates human-facing user-text supply from automatic model/tool/server message admission. The new manual finding is afforded rather than observed; it names the explicit supply decision, not physical persistence. The automatic unit, unit notes, axis note and rationale consistently exclude that human supply mechanism. Review/edit/revert, selected tool approval and project-context replacement remain separate manual affordances; initial and generic-caller control remain unresolved. This repairs the earlier unsupported homogeneous history-admission classification while preserving supported automatic writes: RT-RTE-chat-turn, MEM-OBJ-chat-messages, RT-RTE-revision-admission and MEM-OBJ-project-context.

Curation classifies summary reduction, existing-entry revision, rejection with surviving history and explicit forgetting. It does not infer synthesis from fluent generation, or consolidation/dedup from rebuilding indexes or deduplicating returned hits. The unresolved semantic transformation remains included under a partial assessment: MEM-OBJ-chat-summary, MEM-OBJ-page-revisions, MEM-RTE-bench-author and EPI-OBJ-page-prose.

Read-back direction distinguishes consumer-requested retrieval from automatic context supply within a turn or author job. A job/turn trigger does not itself make all downstream assembly pull. Signal findings identify actual chat/wiki/page matching, coarse availability and history budgets, and embedding/lexical source selection for writer evidence. They do not turn requested page identifiers into push signals or query generation into inferred-judgment selection: RT-RTE-chat-turn, RT-RTE-context-fold, RT-RTE-author-pages and MEM-RTE-search-knowledge.

Trace learning and trace source retain a wired positive for automatic conversation folding and its later context consumer, with session-logs and clipped tool-traces as the qualifying inputs. They do not claim exercised benefit, weight training, additional origins from serialization, or a system-wide negative. Diagnostic/log alternatives remain unresolved rather than being erased or declared absent; partial assessments already carry that uncertainty: MEM-OBJ-chat-messages, MEM-OBJ-chat-summary, MEM-BAP-summary-context, MEM-OBJ-wiki-log and EPI-RTE-citation-evaluation. These faithfully scoped uncertainties require no additional publication limit.

Blockers

none

Limits

none