semquery reconciliation

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

Boundary and record identity

The reports share the boundary and its Source register. Their accounts concern shipped document indexing, retrieval and returning question answering, not an enclosing autonomous-agent loop. All distinguish implementation from observed operation and causal benefit. No analyst answers or refusal were supplied for this reconciliation. No source reads were needed to resolve record ambiguity.

No duplicate supersession is established. Runtime declares components, routes, claims and an authority path, but no operative objects. Memory declares retained objects and two implementation qualifications; epistemic declares transient objects, two route parts and a product claim. Workflow declares no new records and annotates existing routes. The following comparisons rule out identity rather than silently treating differently prefixed records as interchangeable:

• EPI-OBJ-document-source is extracted input before chunk construction, not the retained slices in MEM-OBJ-chunks. EPI-OBJ-prompt is a transient formatted selection of those slices, not another corpus store. EPI-OBJ-answer and EPI-OBJ-citation are separate output parts with different consumers and checks, not duplicates of prompt or retained chunks.
• MEM-OBJ-fts-chunks, MEM-OBJ-vec-chunks and MEM-OBJ-document-paths are lexical, numerical and symbolic retained parts, not duplicate raw text. Stored vectors are outputs of RT-CMP-fast-embed, not that parameter-bearing component. Metadata carrying configured model specs is not the embedding, reranking or chat model itself.
• MEM-OBJ-config assesses symbolic controls separately from natural-language MEM-OBJ-system-prompt. Their common file substrate does not establish identical operative content. Neither object duplicates the admission process RT-RTE-config-admission or its downstream influence channel RT-BAP-prompt-influence. MEM-OBJ-semq-log is separate diagnostic retention, not answer memory or a demonstrated update route.
• EPI-RTE-reader-import explicitly names a part of RT-RTE-index-admission; EPI-RTE-marker-check names a part of RT-RTE-answer-generation. Neither replaces its valid parent route. The epistemic ledger separates functions of these routes without declaring competing whole-route identities. No missing required part is identified by the supplied accounts.
• EPI-CLM-cited-answers records the product's cited-answer claim, not the narrower filtering claim RT-CLM-citation-filter. MEM-CLM-chunk-lineage and MEM-CLM-empty-retention describe distinct provenance and freshness qualifications, not duplicate claims about citation filtering, transaction scope or baseline drift.

Connections and integration dispositions

Acquisition, retention and warrant. The extraction account in EPI-RTE-reader-import and retained-text lineage in MEM-OBJ-chunks connect to RT-RTE-index-admission. Memory describes extraction and slicing rather than model summarization; epistemic adds a DOCX paragraph-boundary-loss deduction and leaves PDF dependency fidelity unresolved. These are compatible findings: mechanical extraction does not guarantee semantic preservation. Automatic readability/storage admission is not per-proposition approval, and CLI initiation does not establish per-chunk human review. The retained positive transformation chain remains intact despite unknown original truth and deployed authorship.

Provenance qualification. MEM-CLM-chunk-lineage supplies the storage insert and associated-document selection evidence: one shared text range can be displayed with a different linked document occurrence. Together with extracted-text rather than binary-file offsets, this limits the provenance supplied by EPI-OBJ-citation. It does not contradict RT-RTE-answer-generation, which promises neither per-occurrence range fidelity nor source support. Disposition: retain the qualification; a displayed path/range cannot certify exact original-file location. No observed bad citation is established.

Freshness and withdrawal. MEM-CLM-empty-retention adds skipped empty/invalid-content counterpaths to RT-RTE-index-admission's config-baseline and hash limitations. The memory annotation further distinguishes explicit deletion's path-component/surviving-root handling from the indexer's raw string-prefix sweep. These are different paths, not conflicting cleanup guarantees. Disposition: retain supported shared-chunk preservation and orphan cleanup alongside possible stale-content and sibling-prefix hazards. Neither successful indexing nor the epistemic ledger's maintenance function establishes exact current-file mirroring, global freshness or falsity-driven retraction. RT-CLM-transaction-scope independently limits rollback to uncommitted transactions, not a whole indexing run.

Selection, delivery and force. RT-RTE-hybrid-search connects retained lexical/numerical selectors to selected raw text. Memory's read-back annotation and the workflow handoffs agree that selection occurs inside a requested search/ask, not unsolicited task initiation or worker delegation. EPI-OBJ-prompt records pre-inference formatting; RT-RTE-answer-generation records concrete GGUF suffix truncation. Thus preserving offered text during formatting and losing leading tokens at inference are compatible, sequential findings. Custom LLM context policies remain outside this concrete-adapter finding. RT-BAP-prompt-influence establishes a model-interpreted channel, not compliance or benefit.

Checking and output. EPI-RTE-marker-check refines RT-CLM-citation-filter without superseding it: numeric membership and deduplication govern metadata, not raw text, sentence support or passage visibility after truncation. The workflow delivery account independently confirms the distinction between streamed text, terminal JSON output, CLI buffered fallback and Engine's missing-terminal-answer error. These are client-specific delivery conditions, not disagreements about one guarantee. Disposition: no factual acceptance or successful end-to-end delivery follows from metadata admission alone; the README claim is not strengthened into a universal truth promise.

Persistence and unresolved evidence. RT-CMP-fast-embed, RT-CMP-fast-reranker and RT-CMP-gguf-llm keep parameter fixity separate from unresolved exact deployed artifacts. Memory's cache/config findings do not remove that uncertainty. The reports also converge on no inspected answer write-back or automatic diagnostic-to-policy update in the named paths. This does not establish absence of every possible learning route in injected components or opaque internals. Unknown human involvement, actual read-back, compliance, evaluation outcomes and improvement remain limits, not disagreements. Test source and diagnostic retention do not supply missing runs or comparisons.

No unresolved cross-report conflict is identified in the supplied versions. The memory integration issues remain qualifications or scoped uncertainties rather than requests to replace runtime findings. The epistemic and workflow accounts depend on runtime findings that still state the mechanisms they require. No status is promoted, narrowed or selected over another report's status here; support and correction decisions remain for report verification.