ExpeL profile verification
Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md
Verification
Checked all ten axes in the memory profile, their included alternatives, natural units, positive findings, evidence bases and coverage assessments against the handed analyst records. No refusal or substantive correction answers were supplied. No source reads were needed; this judgment adds no source evidence.
The comparison boundary is accumulated experience, derived guidance, access structures and their later consumers, not the whole runtime's storage. Excluding external model weights and static method prompts does not erase the included dense retrieval representations or the static examples incorporated into the mixed access pool. Reconciliation resolves the three duplicate epistemic objects to the memory declarations; the profile uses those canonical objects without discarding the epistemic routes' distinct findings. The remaining peer-wording discrepancy does not change the conditional fold-selection mechanism established in RT-RTE-rule-admission.
| Axis | Judgment |
|---|---|
storage_substrate |
The recorded object inventory supports in-memory/files storage and the rebuilt vector access store. Auxiliary dictionary storage remains afforded, not upgraded to wired generation. Complete substrate classification is compatible with unresolved consumers and unobserved file delivery: see MEM-OBJ-analysis-logs, MEM-OBJ-retrieval-docs and MEM-OBJ-critiques. |
representational_form |
Text, fixed keys/counters/containers and dense access representations are distinguished by operative part. The broader grouped units still identify which part supplies each finding. Known form does not assert generated-content correctness or fixed embedding provenance: see MEM-OBJ-trial-history, MEM-OBJ-rule-counts and RT-CMP-embedder. |
lineage |
Trace extraction, fixed-code compilation and import findings have local support. Partial coverage preserves replacement-content and embedding provenance rather than inferring human authorship: see MEM-OBJ-reflections, MEM-OBJ-retrieval-docs and RT-RTE-checkpoint-restore. |
behavioral_authority |
Emitted forces are supported at their named consumers. Update learning is separate from downstream instruction/advice; counters supply ranking, eligibility criteria and an enforced veto. Auxiliary/archive uncertainty is retained. A local update-consumer omission remains the limit below, not an unsupported emitted force: see RT-BAP-rules-acting and EPI-RTE-counter-disposition. |
write_agency |
Ordinary computational admission and access reconstruction support automatic findings. The profile does not mistake startup, overwrite consent, generic checkpoint callers or testing authorship for per-content human approval. Partial alternate-control coverage is faithful: see RT-RTE-training-loop, RT-RTE-checkpoint-restore and MEM-RTE-auxiliary-critique. |
curation_operations |
EDIT, counter decrement/increment and nonpositive exclusion support evolve, decay, promote and invalidate at wired basis. Claimed synthesis refers to requested future generalization, not observed novel propositions. Unknown reflection/cleanup semantics and partial operation coverage remain explicit; duplicate proposal filtering is not falsely classified as retained-entry deduplication: see EPI-RTE-counter-disposition, EPI-RTE-insight-proposal and EPI-RTE-critique-cleanup. |
read_back_direction |
Requested loaders/reporting support pull; subsequent automatic model-context assembly supports push. Delivery of a requested file is not counted again as push. Missing auxiliary/archive readers keep the axis partial: see MEM-RTE-log-inspection and RT-RTE-evaluation-context. |
read_back_signal |
Whole-pool/retry supply and eligibility budgets support coarse selection; extraction/cache and selected-document task lookups support identifier selection; similarity supports inferred-embedding. Findings name actual selected parts rather than treating requested filenames as push targeting. Unsupported reflection dispatch stays unresolved: see MEM-OBJ-rule-items, MEM-OBJ-retrieval-docs and RT-RTE-evaluation-context. |
trace_learning |
Both ordinary reflection-to-retry and rule-update-to-later-consumer chains meet automatic retained behavior-shaping write requirements. Neither needs parameter updates, new knowledge or demonstrated benefit. Unresolved alternatives prevent complete coverage; no unsupported negative is emitted: see MEM-OBJ-reflections and RT-RTE-rule-admission. |
trace_source |
Linked benchmark experience and its recorded action/observation feedback support trajectories and tool-traces for each known qualifying write. Logging alone does not add session-logs or event-streams. Auxiliary later-use and replacement/testing provenance remain unresolved rather than inapplicable: see MEM-OBJ-trial-history, RT-RTE-training-loop and RT-RTE-rule-admission. |
The grouped units do not upgrade conditional auxiliary mechanisms or opaque provenance by borrowing an ordinary-route witness. No finding has been promoted to observed or causally supported. The profile preserves the distinction between operational guidance and independently accepted knowledge, and between extraction holdout and the wider retrieval pool. These uncertainties are faithfully scoped, not additional defects.
Blockers
none
Limits
- The
behavioral_authorityinventory in the profile does not separately classify failed-trial experience at the reflection-generation consumer. MEM-OBJ-reflections and RT-RTE-training-loop establish that this retained experience feeds the automatic production of retained retry guidance, a learning-authority path distinct from the listed extraction-critic consumer and the reflection output's acting authority. Withhold a complete per-update-consumer authority comparison. The axis already sayspartial, its emitted learning value remains supported at the extraction consumer, and the reflection chain is independently retained under trace learning; this local inventory omission changes neither the supported system union nor the central two-chain conclusion.