Eva-brain memory-profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes against the handed records, using the profile type's definitions for natural units, evidence bases and inventory coverage. The handed reconciliation resolves the duplicate raw-source and navigation declarations to the memory records. No additional source reads, quotations or records were needed. The previous verification and the profile author's correction answer were assessed as arguments, not presumed findings.

Storage is supported for the scoped retained files and Git backing. The grouped unit is coarse, but its included parts share those substrates; reconstructed graph structures do not establish an independently accumulated graph store. Form separates prose interpretation from symbolic metadata, matching and dispatch, while retaining arbitrary raw encodings as unresolved. These scopes do not classify external runtime memory or provider weights (MEM-OBJ-raw, MEM-OBJ-knowledge-pages, MEM-OBJ-page-metadata, MEM-OBJ-log, RT-RTE-brain-settings).

The earlier lineage blocker is repaired. The known other-compiled unit now covers only the Rust-formatted saved analysis and its constructed reference metadata. The formatter record supports that derivation. Persisted identifiers, frontmatter and links elsewhere have a separate not-determinable unit, and the rationale no longer treats deterministic consumption as compiled provenance. The dependent finding, unit warrants and rationale agree. Import, subsequent model authoring and operation-derived log entries retain their separately supported lineage findings; historical authorship remains unresolved (profile rationale, EPI-RTE-analysis-format, MEM-OBJ-analyses, MEM-OBJ-page-metadata, MEM-OBJ-log).

Behavioral authority is supported at the named consumers: wiki/raw evidence supplies context, retained text affects lexical ranking, identifiers and links route navigation, modified guidance supplies instructions, settings select dispatch, and log text supplies an admission criterion and enforced scheduling veto. Metadata assessed by lint is not thereby a retained validation criterion. No learning authority is inferred merely from storage or from the trace-learning axis: enqueue uses the log as an eligibility control, not as examples for a further artifact update (MEM-BAP-wiki-evidence, MEM-RTE-mcp-navigation, MEM-OBJ-page-metadata, MEM-OBJ-log, RT-BAP-vault-contract, RT-RTE-brain-settings).

Write agency separates automatic clean-proposal admission and log append from explicit human UI decisions, leaving generic callers and initial admissions unresolved. Workflow initiation does not substitute for per-content approval. Curation findings remain afforded digesting, revision and duplicate-merging under model instructions, not observed faithful transformations. Actual semantic synthesis remains unresolved; Rust formatting and access reconstruction alone establish none of the controlled semantic curation operations (RT-RTE-source-ingest, RT-RTE-analysis-save, RT-RTE-brain-settings, MEM-OBJ-summaries, MEM-OBJ-knowledge-pages, EPI-RTE-analysis-format).

Direction and signal distinguish requested tool/file retrieval from automatic task-start supply of retained profile/configuration. The former supports pull without converting lexical scoring or requested IDs into push signals. The latter supports coarse push: startup selects the active retained configuration/profile, not a relevance-targeted page subset. This does not contradict the memory report's narrower request-driven wiki-retrieval account (MEM-RTE-mcp-navigation, MEM-RTE-desktop-reload, RT-RTE-source-ingest, RT-RTE-brain-settings).

The automatic operation-log write and its later filename-eligibility consumer support the narrow wired trace-learning yes under the profile definition; this is not an improved-capacity or semantic-learning claim. Discrete outcomes and rejection activity support event-stream origin. Agent-summary provenance does not establish recorded conversational turns, tool traces or trajectories. Arbitrary raw content leaves possible trace-fed curation unresolved, and explicit UI-reviewed retention remains separate. Both trace inventories therefore properly remain partial, without a local or system-wide no unsupported by absence records (MEM-OBJ-log, MEM-OBJ-raw, RT-RTE-source-ingest, RT-RTE-analysis-save).

The remaining uncertainties are expressed in the affected units and assessments. They do not require an additional publication limit. All positive bases remain wiring or affordance rather than observed activation, factual correctness or causal benefit.

Blockers

none

Limits

none