Qiju report verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

The reports support a bounded source-grounded account, with no publication blocker. I read all supplied members, their governing types, the records contract, the empty correction-answer files and the artifact check (none). I independently traced source rather than accepting the analysts' validation statements. No target execution, model call or external source was used. Frozen HEAD agrees with the boundary; its tracked tree supports the declared whole-system classification, including shipped host instructions rather than storage alone.

Record support and evidence strength

Capture and admission. SRC-1, src/qiju/cli.py, src/qiju/capture.py, src/qiju/schema.py, src/qiju/paths.py, src/qiju/id_gen.py, src/qiju/util.py and src/qiju/staging.py, support RT-RTE-record-capture, EPI-RTE-shape-check and EPI-RTE-shape-admission. Validation consumes shape/metadata, not session evidence. Normalization preserves unknown keys; supported body input can carry extras and optional metadata outside the six redacted fields. Explicit nonempty IDs also bypass that traversal. This substantiates the privacy qualification, not a universal secret-exclusion guarantee. Marker conflict checks precede directory creation, but markerless explicit input and environment-root routing remain supported alternatives. Sequential short/long appends and existing-ID branches support only partial retry semantics. Workflow rejection, cleanup ordering, root refusal and caller-owned recovery agree with the workflow account; a printed ID is neither payload-equivalence verification nor evidence of subsequent use.

Retained parts and consumers. MEM-OBJ-body-md, MEM-OBJ-next-steps, MEM-OBJ-search-descriptors, MEM-OBJ-address-metadata and MEM-OBJ-redaction-metadata match the operative fields and their different consumers in SRC-1, src/qiju/schema.py, src/qiju/redact.py, src/qiju/search.py and src/qiju/cli.py. Natural-language history and plans are not executable scheduling state; symbolic metadata does not authenticate authorship. MEM-OBJ-staging-record is pre-admission input, not a search tier. MEM-OBJ-redaction-log is a separate audit output: SRC-1, src/qiju/retro_redact.py and src/qiju/storage.py, support retention without a normal search/show consumer. No claim of observed provenance or actual rationale delivery is warranted, and none is emitted.

Retrieval and context. I followed storage merge, ID precedence, filtering, ordering, limit, rendering and show in SRC-1, src/qiju/storage.py, src/qiju/search.py, src/qiju/util.py and src/qiju/cli.py. RT-RTE-record-retrieval is implemented explicit selection, not relevance ranking. Full default search and direct show are supported-input counterpaths to the installed two-phase procedure. Smaller renderings omit content before host delivery; they do not evict existing host turns. Summary retains an authored title rather than a synthesized narrative. Table columns can be caller-selected. EPI-RTE-action-rollup correctly isolates string deduplication from completion assessment: neither rollup nor its unchecked renderer reads later body text to retract older plans. The completion example is a valid source deduction, not an observed failure. Session ordering and all-project enumeration qualify ordinary timestamp/scope behavior; the reports do not promise exhaustive recall of arbitrary short-only workspaces.

Lifecycle and preservation. SRC-1, src/qiju/maintain.py, src/qiju/archive.py, src/qiju/retro_redact.py, src/qiju/migrate.py and the relevant cleanup/CLI branches support RT-RTE-store-maintenance, RT-RTE-privacy-repair, RT-RTE-store-migration and EPI-RTE-store-withdrawal. I checked age/size conjunctions, invalid-timestamp treatment, archive-before-prune ordering, row/ID validation, literal replacement scope, retag preflight and legacy import separately. Legacy import bypasses capture redaction and can mark migration complete after an archive skip. Rebranding recursively reaches narrative strings, so the epistemic semantic counterexample is reachable through the import path. Short rotation does not verify a surviving durable copy. Purge deletes home long/archive, while ordinary project cleanup can remove the marker and preserve short records. These findings support the qualifications on RT-CLM-lossless-records, not end-to-end losslessness or tested recovery.

Host authority and review. Complete skill bodies and installation branches in SRC-1, src/qiju/init_cmd.py, plus src/qiju/update_cmd.py, docs/host-integration.md and README.md, support RT-OBJ-qiju-skills, RT-CMP-host-model, RT-BAP-host-guidance, MEM-BAP-record-history, RT-RTE-skill-review and RT-RTE-skill-install. Installed instructions and retrieved history are different payloads. Provider mutability remains uninspected. Review requests evidence-sensitive diagnosis and user-authorized edits; it does not implement an automatic factual acceptance or promotion gate. Direct package refresh is an independent replacement route and can displace local guidance. The no-root early return limits global refresh. The claims EPI-CLM-verified-history and EPI-CLM-review-improvement are correctly attributed doctrine. Their comparison with structural admission and requested review does not establish factual verification, learning benefit or exercised self-improvement. Separate theory-builder, reflection and autonomy assessments remain appropriately bounded rather than collapsed into one negative.

Identity, reconciliation and omission disposition

I checked every declared record's referent, source anchor and evidence status, including the epistemic objects EPI-OBJ-body-md, EPI-OBJ-next-steps and EPI-OBJ-record-metadata. The two supersessions in reconciliation identify the same body and next-step fields without erasing epistemic assessments. The metadata aggregate can remain beside differentiated memory fields: it does not assign them one universal form or consumer. All three Part of: relations are substantive containment: shape evaluation and admission within capture, action rollup within retrieval. Claim-versus-mechanism mismatches are not analyst disagreements. No unresolved cross-report conflict requiring a missing-part declaration or correction was found. There are no evidenced-absence declarations or correction objections to adjudicate. Wired CLI routes, afforded host procedures and uninspected operation are consistently separated; the epistemic ledger's doctrine-only host functions do not contradict implemented instruction installation.

Selected omission questions came from the frozen tracked tree and producer/consumer dependencies: whether another caller bypasses capture controls; whether rendering changes what reaches the host; whether maintenance/import contradict preservation; and whether installation or another trigger closes the review-to-behavior loop. Beyond listed anchors I inspected SRC-1, src/qiju/register.py, for registry-driven replacement selection, and searched shipped code/docs for hooks, automatic capture, scheduled maintenance, embeddings, verification and compaction. Registry writes select administrative targets, not a hidden factual evaluator or trace-to-guidance learning loop. Documentation exposed the scheduled-maintenance qualification retained below. No additional implemented driver was present in the tracked tree. This is not an exhaustive multilingual claim inventory, and no such completeness is asserted. Further omission expansion stopped because selected central challenges have supported dispositions, the reports already bound external host behavior and execution evidence, and no remaining identified alternative threatens their central account.

Blockers

none

Limits

• RT-RTE-store-maintenance establishes explicit maintenance and its storage effects, but does not inventory the optional scheduled-maintenance installation described in SRC-1, docs/overview.md. The frozen tracked tree contains no install.sh or launchd job implementation; cleanup references to removing an existing launchd job do not establish its installation or execution. Withhold comparisons of scheduler wiring, unattended maintenance coverage or automatic upkeep reliability. The explicit maintenance route and its retention findings remain supported. This is a local doctrine/implementation coverage limit, not evidence that scheduling never existed.

The package-manager install covers normal use. Use the source installer when working on Qiju itself or when installing the optional macOS launchd maintenance job: --- docs/overview.md