llm-wiki-cli profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes of the profile against the handed runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow records, resolving the two supersessions through the supplied reconciliation. The profile uses the canonical Practice-items and temporal-cycle records. No source reads were needed; no execution or benefit evidence was inferred from implementation.

Storage findings distinguish canonical SQLite from retained file projections and Book blobs. Form separates readable prose from fixed-rule metadata and preserves opaque originals rather than classifying them from normalized text. The grouped units establish common substrate or form, not one shared database or uniform consumer behavior. Initial provenance, conversion and opaque alternatives remain unresolved. See MEM-OBJ-book-blocks, MEM-OBJ-derived-indexes and MEM-OBJ-pages.

Lineage findings distinguish authored replacements, imported evidence/copies, code-derived state and afforded extraction from experience. Authority findings are supported at their named consumers: reference knowledge, standing guidance, numeric ranking, continuation selection and retained admission criteria. Validation and enforcing rejection coexist without establishing truth or authenticated consent. The scheduler supplies an independent learning-authority witness. See RT-BAP-wiki-context, RT-BAP-soul-guidance, EPI-RTE-practice-verify and MEM-RTE-practice-review.

Write agency correctly separates automatic capture and derived-state admission from unresolved generic callers. Claimed manual Soul/archive gates remain policy-level findings, not authenticated operation. Curation classifications follow replacement, dependency invalidation, eviction, salience adjustment and afforded summary production. Neither hash reuse nor the synthesis command name establishes deduplication or a novel claim. See MEM-RTE-discussion-capture, RT-RTE-soul-publish, MEM-RTE-archive-admit and MEM-RTE-book-synthesis.

Direction and signal preserve request/selection/delivery distinctions. Requested Book windows and Practice queues are pull; lifecycle supply is push. Tag availability/budgets support coarse selection, and explicit context tracking supports identifier selection for task cues. Unknown host and fallback branches are not declared pull-only or inapplicable. See RT-RTE-hook-context and MEM-RTE-task-continuity.

Trace learning retains wired rating-to-card-to-queue separately from afforded Discussion and Tutor continuation. Discrete review events and conversational inputs support their respective trace-source values; neither raw capture nor static imported documents alone qualifies. The remaining update inventory stays unresolved, with no unsupported local or system-wide negative. All ten axis assessments are partial; none claims complete system coverage. See MEM-RTE-practice-review, MEM-BAP-discussion-summary and RT-RTE-tutor-turn.

Blockers

none

Limits

• The profile's partial behavioral-authority inventory classifies learning authority only for the scheduler, while its trace-learning inventory also identifies afforded Discussion-summary and Tutor-checkpoint updates. The retained conversational inputs at those update consumers are not separately classified for learning authority, although their downstream reference/continuation effects are described. See profile, MEM-RTE-discussion-revise, MEM-BAP-discussion-summary and RT-RTE-tutor-turn. Withhold a complete consumer-by-consumer learning-authority inventory or comparisons counting those paths. This omission does not invalidate the emitted learning value, independently supported by MEM-RTE-practice-review, or change the already partial axis assessment.