IWE profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes in the memory profile, including their unit scopes, controlled findings, evidence bases and coverage assessments, against the handed runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow records and annotations. I applied the reconciliation's proposal and policy-body supersessions when resolving support. The supplied profile answers are empty. No additional source inspection was needed; this judgment adds no source evidence.

Storage and form: The known inventories distinguish durable files from loaded graph/access structures, and natural-language payloads from symbolic control fields. MEM-OBJ-documents, RT-OBJ-graph, RT-OBJ-session-record, MEM-OBJ-proposal and MEM-OBJ-policy-knobs support these classifications. Grouping the file-backed parts does not hide a differently classified substrate. The graph finding denotes an access structure, not a separate graph database. Excluded host weights and unsaved working copies are not silently classified as retained target memory.

Lineage and authority: Partial coverage is justified. Known authoring, installation, trace extraction and software bookkeeping paths do not resolve original user-content provenance. The profile preserves that distinction through MEM-RTE-memory-enable and MEM-OBJ-documents. Authority findings identify actual consumers: document/inbox context, interpreted policy, deterministic ranking/window selection, and checked schema admission. RT-RTE-document-retrieval, MEM-RTE-inbox-read, RT-BAP-session-policy and RT-BAP-schema-admission support those forces without implying universal enforcement or observed host compliance. Feedback's learning authority at a policy-update consumer is distinct from the resulting policy's instruction force; MEM-OBJ-rejected supports the afforded update path.

Write agency and curation: Software staging/bookkeeping and requested human selection are separate admission mechanisms, not competing descriptions of physical I/O. The automatic wired staging finding and manual afforded final-selection finding are supported by MEM-OBJ-proposal, RT-RTE-session-capture and WF-RTE-inbox-selection. Generic callers remain unresolved rather than presumed human. Consolidation, deduplication, evolution, invalidation, decay and promotion retain afforded strength. The memory annotation on RT-RTE-policy-maintenance supplies the policy-dependent curation distinctions, including tombstones and protected classes. MEM-RTE-graph-restructure does not upgrade requested semantic curation to wired execution. Partial coverage preserves the unresolved lower-level transformations.

Read-back direction and signal: Known pull and push routes are supported within the declared inventory. Requested retrieval, MCP context and inbox responses are pull; independently selected session-start discovery output is push. RT-RTE-session-index and its memory annotation establish conditional metadata/policy output, including the no-groups guard. Its filters, sort and budgets support coarse selection, not task-relevance selection. Requested keys and lexical search in RT-RTE-document-retrieval do not establish identifier or lexical push. External invocation/delivery uncertainty does not obscure the implemented selector's direction or signal.

Trace learning and source: The afforded positive has a complete qualifying chain: conversation/tool experience feeds automatic proposal admission, durable proposals survive interruption, and later inbox consumers receive their bodies/evidence as context. RT-RTE-session-capture, MEM-OBJ-proposal and MEM-RTE-inbox-read support this before final document admission. A candidate need not be accepted as fact or demonstrate improvement to qualify. Conversely, user-confirmed document/policy writes do not themselves establish automatic trace learning. The profile correctly leaves generic alternatives unresolved, emits no unsupported negative, and keeps both axes partial. The capture annotation supports session-log and tool-trace inputs; serialization alone adds neither event streams nor trajectories.

The records' apparent tensions are preserved rather than flattened: procedural user selection is not an all-write invariant; retained provenance is not necessarily delivered by ordinary retrieval; grouped inbox output is not full evidence; bookkeeping is not authenticated feedback; and helper output is not observed model receipt. These qualifications leave the emitted comparison findings valid. Existing unresolved scopes are faithfully expressed in the profile rather than defects requiring a separate publication limit. I found no materially unsupported value, evidence-strength upgrade or complete-coverage assertion.

Blockers

none

Limits

none