Link profile verification
Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md
Verification
I checked all ten axes in the profile against the handed runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow records and annotations. I assessed emitted values, evidence bases, natural units, scope exclusions and coverage separately. The supplied reconciliation resolves the wiki-page and consolidation-planner duplicates to the memory declarations used by the profile. No unresolved report disagreement changes these classifications. No source files were read, and no new evidence or replacement classification is supplied here.
The comparison concerns accumulated content, access state and controls, not unchanged shipped instructions or external provider parameters. The profile preserves unknown caller control, initial provenance, arbitrary checkpoint payloads and auxiliary mechanisms rather than turning a positive witness into complete system coverage. All axis assessments are partial. Missing execution evidence limits activation and benefit, not inspectable wiring.
| Axis | Judgment and supporting records |
|---|---|
| storage_substrate | Files, SQLite, process memory and Git repository state are supported. JSON keys, graph links and dense vectors do not independently establish KV, graph or vector database substrates. Checkpoint and export stores remain distinct from their payload forms. See MEM-OBJ-wiki-cache, MEM-OBJ-semantic-index, RT-OBJ-operation-journal, RT-RTE-workspace-sync and MEM-RTE-retained-export. The local inventory omission below does not change the emitted substrate values. |
| representational_form | Natural-language content, symbolic control/index parts and distributed numerical vectors have separate consumption-path classifications. The vector finding does not assert training of provider weights. Unknown opted-in raw checkpoint bytes remain partial rather than being classified from their readable summaries. See MEM-OBJ-memory-claim, MEM-OBJ-memory-controls, MEM-OBJ-retrieval-context, MEM-OBJ-semantic-index and RT-RTE-local-recovery. |
| lineage | Authored, imported, trace-extracted and other-compiled findings concern supported derivation paths, not authenticated origins of every payload. Known compilation does not settle initial content or external encoding provenance. Agent-authored wiki lineage correctly retains claimed basis. See MEM-OBJ-session-capture, MEM-OBJ-wiki-cache, EPI-RTE-export-rendering and RT-RTE-agent-wiki. |
| behavioral_authority | The findings distinguish interpreting readers, rankers, eligibility/admission controls, recovery routing and the capture-to-memory update consumer. Retained text scored by fixed code supports ranking. Dismissal fingerprints and ownership hashes supply both criteria and vetoes. Focused lifecycle enforcement is not attributed to generic wiki delivery. Optional salience and offline export readers retain afforded basis. See MEM-RTE-wiki-read, MEM-OBJ-dismissed-proposals, RT-RTE-structured-ingest, MEM-RTE-usage-feedback and RT-RTE-session-capture. |
| write_agency | Software-generated capture, caches, instrumentation, checkpoints, seed and reconciled copies support automatic admission. Workflow initiation does not establish per-content manual approval. Human approval/review is classified as claimed manual control; actual generic callable admission and explicit replacement remain unresolved. See RT-RTE-memory-admission, EPI-RTE-review-marking, RT-RTE-project-seed and RT-RTE-local-recovery. |
| curation_operations | Extraction supports consolidation despite normalization fidelity limits. Append/metadata revision, focused withdrawal, deletion and bounded retention, applied capture deduplication and review ranking promotion support their respective findings. Requested agent synthesis remains claimed. The read-only planner is not treated as an implemented merge; unretained query clipping is excluded. See EPI-RTE-proposal-normalization, MEM-RTE-memory-lifecycle, MEM-RTE-capture-cleanup, EPI-RTE-review-marking and MEM-RTE-consolidation-plan. |
| read_back_direction | Requested recall, review, acceptance and recovery are pull. Startup/autobrief and prompt reminders independently supply retained material and support push. Automatic supply of access/control state to later software consumers is separately scoped; it does not relabel requested content delivery as push. See RT-RTE-context-recall, RT-RTE-session-delivery, MEM-RTE-guard-reminder and MEM-RTE-usage-feedback. |
| read_back_signal | Startup availability, eligibility and budgets support coarse selection; actual project matches support identifier selection. Guard prompt overlap supports inferred-lexical selection, separately from project eligibility and cooldown. Loading available cache/control history is scoped as coarse supply, not embedding-based selection of that history. Pull-only units are locally inapplicable, while auxiliary alternatives remain unresolved. See MEM-OBJ-memory-controls, RT-RTE-session-delivery, MEM-RTE-guard-reminder and MEM-OBJ-wiki-cache. |
| trace_learning | Automatic session extraction has durable later review/startup consumers; usage history changes later reminder decisions; operation markers/manifests change later recovery decisions. These are supported automatic trace-fed behavioral-context/control paths under this axis's definition, not claims of improved capacity or learned provider parameters. Mixed caller, seed and vector provenance remains unresolved. See MEM-OBJ-session-capture, RT-RTE-session-delivery, MEM-RTE-usage-feedback, RT-OBJ-operation-journal and RT-RTE-local-recovery. |
| trace_source | Recorded conversational turns support session-logs. Discrete surfacing/reminder and operation activity support event-streams for their qualifying control writes. Adapter labels do not add a source category. Returned-name instrumentation does not alone establish consumption of tool request/result bodies; mixed imports and checkpoint payload origins retain uncertainty. See RT-RTE-session-capture, MEM-OBJ-usage-ledger, RT-OBJ-operation-journal and RT-RTE-project-seed. |
Some units group several mechanisms with common values and coverage. Their notes and record destinations preserve the operative distinctions needed to assess the emitted findings. They should not be read as equivalence claims about admission checks, consumer force or deployment. No unsupported comparison value, evidence upgrade, bounded absence or system-complete inventory assertion was established. The remaining uncertainty already expressed by the profile is not itself an additional verification limit.
Blockers
none
Limits
- The profile's partial inventory does not separately classify retained raw Obsidian copies and project-seed provenance snapshots as object units across storage, form and authority. RT-RTE-source-import establishes copied raw Markdown for later ingest, while RT-RTE-project-seed and its memory annotation distinguish the raw snapshot from the generated wiki source page. Their import/read routes are represented, but the content-object inventory is coarser. Withhold complete raw-source inventory and per-object provenance-consumer comparisons. This is a local omission in partial axes: it does not invalidate the emitted files, natural-language or imported findings, imply absent raw retention, or change a central system-level comparison value.