ReasoningBank report verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

The current reports support a bounded source-grounded account. The earlier standalone-induction evidence-strength defect is repaired. I read all supplied members, types, correction answers, the structural check, record contract and previous verification, then independently traced the consequential implementations. The structural report-check contains no findings. SRC-1 HEAD equals the frozen revision and the checkout is clean. No target code, tests, examples or provider calls were executed. The evidence remains implementation and doctrine/design, not observed operation or causal benefit; see boundary.

Runtime and workflow

RT-RTE-web-pipeline and RT-RTE-web-admission are supported by SRC-1 WebArena/pipeline_memory.py, WebArena/run.py and WebArena/induce_memory.py. The parent waits without rejecting nonzero child returns. No-memory mode bypasses retrieval and induction. Success-only AWM/Synapse branches, incompatible model-choice surfaces and automatic blank-line-block append support the stated alternate-path qualifications. Outcome feedback chooses generation guidance; it does not evaluate subsequently generated advice. Extracted think/action pairs are narrower than the saved browser evidence.

RT-RTE-swe-task, RT-RTE-swe-admission and WF-RTE-action-recovery are supported by SRC-1 SWE-Bench/run.sh, third_party/src/minisweagent/run/extra/swebench.py, third_party/src/minisweagent/agents/default.py and third_party/src/minisweagent/run/utils/save.py. Retrieval precedes the execution try block. Trajectory and prediction persistence precede judging and advice append. Ordinary restart skips existing prediction keys, including partial memory-loop completions. The parser enforces one bash block, not command safety or patch correctness. Format/timeout feedback allows another turn without establishing successful recovery or rollback. Submission detection and the delivered prediction are not benchmark acceptance. One shipped worker and unlocked bank/cache writes correctly limit the concurrency account.

RT-RTE-client-selection separates operator-selected trusted imports from autonomous machinery revision. SRC-1 third_party/src/minisweagent/models/__init__.py, third_party/src/minisweagent/environments/__init__.py, third_party/src/minisweagent/environments/docker.py, third_party/src/minisweagent/environments/local.py and third_party/src/minisweagent/config/extra/swebench.yaml support configured Docker execution, selectable host-shell execution and prompt-only edit restrictions. Agent query limits do not cover direct judge, generator or embedding calls.

RT-RTE-context-control is supported by SRC-1 WebArena/agents/legacy/agent.py, selected construction/shrink/history sections of WebArena/agents/legacy/dynamic_prompting.py, the coding agent and its observation template. Web truncation alters a reconstructed view rather than replacing episode state with a semantic summary. Claude bypass, iteration exhaustion and advice injection after fitting prevent a whole-request budget guarantee. Coding output keeps head/tail, with explicit later shell reads rather than automatic restoration. Optional scratchpad and durable advice remain distinct.

RT-CMP-task-model, RT-CMP-gemini-embedding and RT-CMP-qwen-embedding correctly separate numerical computation from text supply. The inspected calls and factories implement no operational parameter update and provide no exact weight/revision pin. Provider internals remain unknown. RT-BAP-system-memory is supported by the web and coding agent implementations: system-message placement supplies model-mediated advice, not an enforced action rule or observed reliance.

Memory and epistemic findings

I independently read both SRC-1 selector files, WebArena/memory_management.py and third_party/src/minisweagent/memory/memory_management.py. MEM-RTE-web-retrieval, MEM-RTE-coding-retrieval, MEM-OBJ-query-cache and EPI-RTE-query-selection preserve the operative order: load prior cache, append the current query, rank the old snapshot, select top IDs, then take the first matching bank row. No lower-ranked fallback follows an unmatched top ID; status does not filter retrieval. Optional Qwen query caching leaves instruction-query scoring on Gemini. Selection bounds records, not items or tokens.

MEM-OBJ-web-advice, MEM-OBJ-coding-advice, MEM-OBJ-lineage-ledger and MEM-OBJ-delivery-text accurately distinguish prose, identity/provenance fields and overwritten delivery state. The ordinary induction, runner and agent files support blank-line splitting, advice-only delivery, repeated web-file reads and fresh coding context. Synapse's successful branch copies a formatted trajectory rather than demonstrating generalized reasoning. Cleanup of task outputs does not retract bank/cache rows.

MEM-OBJ-trajectory and MEM-OBJ-feedback preserve raw artifacts, extracted views and outcome signals as different surfaces. SRC-1 saver and batch-driver code confirms retained system messages followed by their omission from the coding judge/generator transcript. Judge rationale does not cross the Boolean interface. The loading/display path in SRC-1 third_party/src/minisweagent/run/inspector.py establishes human inspection, not approval or advice adoption.

EPI-OBJ-web-trajectory, EPI-OBJ-autoeval, EPI-OBJ-web-memory and EPI-OBJ-swe-memory retain supported evidence-view and bank-row container identities. SRC-1 WebArena/autoeval/evaluate_trajectory.py confirms skipped unreadable/actionless steps, capped captions and separately saved gt/rm/thoughts. The supplied output absence correctly leaves actual advice propositions and their transformation relations indeterminate.

EPI-RTE-web-check is supported by that driver, SRC-1 WebArena/autoeval/evaluator.py and WebArena/autoeval/prompts.py: explicit task criteria consume a bounded view without expected answers, with at most five captions. Vision dispatch cannot satisfy its assertion through the shipped CLI model choices. EPI-RTE-swe-check is supported by the coding driver: substring parsing can classify unsuccessful as success. Both checks choose guidance before advice generation, not advice acceptance.

EPI-RTE-benchmark-check is supported by SRC-1 third_party/webarena/evaluation_harness/evaluators.py and third_party/webarena/evaluation_harness/helper_functions.py. I checked normalization, exact/inclusion and URL predicates, HTML extraction, combination, N/A score reset, fuzzy containment and unachievability parsing. Symbolic derivations license their configured predicates; model-backed judgments and reference fidelity have different limits. Installed host-to-summary wiring remains conditional. EPI-RTE-answer-regrading correctly separates its scoring body from an ordinary launch blocked by the missing import binding in SRC-1 WebArena/reeval_memevol_prompt.py and WebArena/webarena_patch.py. Memory's reporting-body description does not assert a successful launch or automatic bank revision.

EPI-CLM-memory-learning, EPI-CLM-memory-scaling and EPI-CLM-advice-transfer match SRC-1 README.md, WebArena/prompts/memory_instruction.py and third_party/src/minisweagent/memory/instruction.py. They are design claims, not registered experiments. The ledger correctly separates generation, checking, admission, retention and advisory consumption. Theory formulation, decision dependence, criticism, iteration, learning and exercised self-improvement remain independently qualified. Automatic persistence does not close the missing behavioral or causal links.

Correction, alternatives and reconciliation

The epistemic correction answer is supported. I reread SRC-1 third_party/src/minisweagent/memory/induce_memory.py, third_party/src/minisweagent/run/mini_extra.py and the package script registration in third_party/pyproject.toml. The differently rooted imports have no established standalone launch contract in those entry points. EPI-RTE-legacy-induction now uses afforded implementation, an intended return, unresolved launch context and unestablished later routing, agreeing with MEM-RTE-standalone-induction. Its retention ledger, coverage, authority, persistence and bounded conclusion consistently distinguish append-body code from end-to-end invocation. The earlier blocker is discharged; lack of execution is not being used as evidence of impossibility.

RT-RTE-web-scaling and its annotations are supported by SRC-1 WebArena/pipeline_scaling.py, WebArena/induce_scaling.py and WebArena/utils/clients.py: the launcher supplies only the final trial directory, induction rereads it, omits model forwarding, takes an uninstantiated client class and fails to unpack the ordinary tuple contract. The inverted status variable is not included as an explicit label in the assembled trajectories. The epistemic doctrine-only classification concerns claimed distinct-trajectory synthesis, not denial of implemented trial launching. No report establishes usable combined advice or comparative warrant.

All declared Part of relations have supported containment: retrieval and recovery are parts of task loops, checks belong to their pipeline/admission containers, and output objects or evidence views can be parts of route containers without being duplicate routes. There are no evidenced-absence declarations. Reconciliation correctly supersedes the duplicate web-selection and standalone-induction identities without changing their findings. Row containers remain valid alongside separate content/ledger parts; broader feedback/artifact objects differ from the narrower epistemic objects. No required split or unresolved cross-report conflict remains. Memory integration issues and workflow ordering additions have explicit supported dispositions; agreement does not remove their source limits.

Omission searches and stopping decision

The selected questions were whether another shipped caller changes advice admission authority, whether retained evidence actually reaches later task consumers, and whether alternate evaluators or context controls overturn the bounded findings. The search basis was the frozen tracked tree, CLI registration and producer/consumer dependencies, not just report anchors. SRC-1 searches across WebArena/ and third_party/src/ for selection, bank, selected-memory, induction and regrading names were followed through both ordinary drivers and standalone induction. Targeted caller inspection in SRC-1 third_party/src/minisweagent/run/extra/swebench_single.py, third_party/src/minisweagent/run/github_issue.py and third_party/src/minisweagent/run/mini.py shows task execution and trajectory saving without their own bank selection/admission chain; this does not establish a universal negative about their agent internals. SRC-1 WebArena/utils/evaluator.py uses a last-caption view rather than the ordinary evaluator's five-caption view, consistent with the report's alternate-path qualification.

The optional memoization definition in SRC-1 WebArena/agents/legacy/utils/llm_utils.py and provider factory in WebArena/agents/legacy/utils/chat_api.py support an affordance, not established task-loop activation. No necessary omitted mechanism was identified that changes the ordinary automatic-admission, advice-only delivery or unobserved-benefit conclusions. Further optional expansion stopped because these selected questions have supported bounded dispositions and no identified material challenge remains without one. Initial imported contents, provider internals, other adapters and uncaptured execution remain local uncertainties already expressed by the reports; they do not license repository-wide absence, exhaustive route equivalence or safety claims. Additional ancillary files alone do not justify extending this verification into a complete runtime audit.

Blockers

none

Limits

none