ReasoningBank profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

Checked all ten axes in the memory profile against the handed runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow records, using reconciliation to resolve the two superseded route identities. No source files were read, no records were added and no replacement classifications were authored. There was no refusal to answer. The judgment concerns supported comparison findings, not observed execution or benefit.

Scope, storage and form. The profile distinguishes retained advice, access structures, saved experience, feedback and delivery artifacts from static prompts, unchanged provider weights and ordinary episode accumulation. MEM-OBJ-web-advice, MEM-OBJ-coding-advice, MEM-OBJ-lineage-ledger, MEM-OBJ-query-cache, MEM-OBJ-delivery-text, MEM-OBJ-trajectory and MEM-OBJ-feedback support the file-backed inventory and the separately named RAM views. JSONL encoding does not warrant a vector-database substrate. The form axis separates interpreted text, fixed-rule identifiers/status wrappers and distributed numerical selector inputs. It does not classify provider weights as accumulated memory or treat displayed action examples as directly executed instructions. Grouping homogeneous file-backed parts preserves their common value and coverage; mixed consumption paths are separated where classification changes.

Lineage and admission. The profile separates subsequent trace extraction, imported task/environment text and compiled access/delivery structures from unknown initial content. These distinctions follow the object records and RT-RTE-web-admission and RT-RTE-swe-admission. Its automatic write findings concern computational admission rather than model authorship or filesystem I/O. Starting a workflow does not establish manual content approval. The separate partial trajectory-admission unit appropriately withholds a complete classification of installed BrowserGym persistence. Neither initial bank/cache control nor historical embedding provenance inherits the certainty of subsequent inspected writes.

Authority. The profile identifies actual consumers and effects: procedural advice at task models, demonstrations and traces as reference/evidence, experience at durable-advice updaters, vectors at similarity ranking, and identifiers/outcome fields at lookup or prompt routing. RT-BAP-system-memory, MEM-RTE-web-retrieval, MEM-RTE-coding-retrieval and the admission records support these distinct paths. Learning authority at the updater is not evidence of improved capacity. Stored bank status and template metadata receive no invented authority. The profile does not mistake outcome-conditioned generation for advice validation or executor enforcement.

Curation. The consolidation findings concern reduction of retained traces, not revision of existing advice. This mapping is consistent with the profile type's definition despite the memory report's narrower contrast between trace extraction and old-bank consolidation. The inspected extraction/generation chains support that architectural operation. The semantic uncertainty retained by EPI-OBJ-web-memory and EPI-OBJ-swe-memory prevents an additional synthesis finding, not the supported trace-reduction finding. Prompt requests for generalization, non-overlap or reflection do not establish synthesis, deduplication or evolution. The partial assessments preserve that distinction.

Read-back direction and signal. The profile's request-side pull and automatic task-model supply push describe different operations in the same chain. The source-native memory account calls the overall route requested task setup; that does not negate automatic selection and supply to a task model that did not request memory. The profile does not count the requested selector return itself as another push. The two retrieval records and MEM-OBJ-query-cache support instruction-query embedding selection followed by an actual identity join selecting delivered advice. This is stronger evidence for identifier selection than a file name or catalog label alone. The profile retains the one-record rather than token budget and does not infer coarse targeting from availability checks.

Trace learning and origin. The ordinary automatic trajectory-to-advice writes, durable append and later system-message consumption support wired trace learning without a parameter update or demonstrated gain. RT-RTE-web-admission, RT-RTE-swe-admission, the retrieval records and MEM-OBJ-trajectory support the web trajectory and mixed coding conversational/tool/trajectory findings. System-message removal limits the coding updater's input. The profile does not turn serialization or ordered activity alone into an event-stream source. The workflow account independently preserves the distinction between saved predictions, completed advice admission and successful task execution; no profile finding requires those stages to be transactional.

Alternatives and coverage. RT-RTE-web-scaling and MEM-RTE-standalone-induction remain afforded alternatives rather than wired complete learning loops. Their intended file destinations and trace inputs can be classified at that local strength without establishing compatible downstream consumption. Scaling's incompatible return payload is not wholly classified from its requested prose; standalone output has no established later destination consumer. The profile retains both gaps, initial-content uncertainty and ancillary uninspected routes. All ten axes remain partial, and no absence or inapplicability finding closes an unresolved branch. Canonical retrieval and standalone citations preserve the supersessions without strengthening their evidence. These faithfully scoped uncertainties require no additional verification limit. No material unsupported emitted value, evidence upgrade or complete-coverage assertion was found.

Blockers

none

Limits

none